do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2160and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2151 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses 2021/C 491/01
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021491EN.01000101.xml










7.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 491/1






Notice for the attention of persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2160and in Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2151 concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses
(2021/C 491/01)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/2160 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 2020/1998 (3) as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2151 (4), concerning restrictive measures against serious human rights violations and abuses.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be maintained on the list of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999 and Regulation (EU) 2020/1998. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2020/1998, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 July 2022, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, pursuant to Article 10 of Decision (CFSP) 2020/1999, of the list of designated persons and entities.


(1)  OJ L 410 I , 7.12.2020, p. 13.

(2)  OJ L 436, 7.12.2021, p. 40.

(3)  OJ L 410 I , 7.12.2020, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 436, 7.12.2021, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10304 – THERMO FISHER / PPD) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 78/01
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health service, medical device, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, research body








C_2022078EN.01000101.xml










18.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 78/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10304 – THERMO FISHER / PPD)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 78/01)
On 7 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10304. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-46/21: Order of the General Court of 7 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, household article, household electrical appliance, lighting equipment, plumbing equipment, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2022095EN.01004503.xml










28.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/45






Order of the General Court of 7 December 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)
(Case T-46/21) (1)

(2022/C 95/65)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 88, 15.3.2021.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10550 – PHILLIPS 66 / FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP / WESTERN OIL) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 507/02
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consumer goods, economic concentration, energy industry, investment company, merger control, motor fuel, multinational enterprise, oil refining, retail trade, wholesale trade








C_2021507EN.01000701.xml










16.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 507/7






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10550 – PHILLIPS 66 / FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP / WESTERN OIL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 507/02)
On 7 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10550. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-763/21: Action brought on 7 December 2021 — SE v Commission
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, age discrimination, competition (EU), full-time employment, indemnification, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), temporary employment








C_2022073EN.01005001.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/50






Action brought on 7 December 2021 — SE v Commission
(Case T-763/21)
(2022/C 73/63)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SE (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision dated 23 April 2021 to reject the applicant’s candidacy to the Junior Professional Pilot program (hereinafter ‘JPP program’);










—


annul, insofar as necessary, the decision dated 27 August 2021 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 27 April 2021;










—


order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to be reclassified as a temporary agent AD 5 as from 1 October 2021, as estimated in the application;










—


order compensation of his material prejudice resulting from the loss of a chance to become a permanent official based on participation in internal competitions restricted to temporary agents at AD level, as estimated in the application;










—


order the defendant to pay the entire costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging age discrimination, in violation of Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, Article 1d of the Staff Regulations and Article 10(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging abuse of mandate and/or lack of competence.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the call for expressions of interest is illegal.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10447 – NN / METLIFE GREECE / METLIFE POLAND) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 122/08
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health insurance, life assurance, merger control, pension scheme








C_2022122EN.01003101.xml










17.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 122/31






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10447 – NN / METLIFE GREECE / METLIFE POLAND)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 122/08)
On 7 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10447. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10517 – PERMIRA / THOMA BRAVO / MOTUS) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 509/02
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Internet, allowances and expenses, economic concentration, financial services, health care, information security, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, teleworking








C_2021509EN.01000201.xml










17.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 509/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10517 – PERMIRA / THOMA BRAVO / MOTUS)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 509/02)
On 7 December 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10517. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-765/21: Action brought on 7 December 2021 — Imdea Materiales v Commission
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, access to EU information, contract terms, indemnification, principle of proportionality








C_2022073EN.01005002.xml










14.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/50






Action brought on 7 December 2021 — Imdea Materiales v Commission
(Case T-765/21)
(2022/C 73/64)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Fundación Imdea Materiales (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Suárez Fernández, J. Salinas Casado and Z. Marcos Vaquero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant submits that the Court should:






—


declare that the European Commission has failed to comply with Article II.22.5 of the General Conditions of the Contract entitled ‘FP7 Grant Agreement — Annex II General Conditions’ so that the process reverts to the stage when observations are presented to the European Commission;










—


declare that there has been no breach of the contractual terms and conditions by IMDEA (Fundación Imdea Materiales) so that the recovery and compensation measures imposed are ineffective;










—


alternatively, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, recalculate the amount to be recovered by the European Commission.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement by the European Commission of Article II.22.5 of the General Conditions, in view of the refusal of access to documentation and information provided to IMDEA, which could not be taken into account at the time when observations were presented;










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the veracity of the expenses declared by the IMDEA to the European Commission for the researchers who were part of the Compose3 Project in relation to Articles II.14 and II.15 of the General Conditions;






—


In that regard, a large amount of evidence is provided, the combined assessment of which leads to the conclusion that the expenses were genuine;














3.


Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article II.22.6 of the General Conditions as a result of the breach of the principle of proportionality, in so far as the European Commission failed to carry out any balancing of the punitive measures imposed.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 6 December 2021 2021/C 491/03
Date: 2021-12-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021491EN.01000401.xml










7.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 491/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

6 December 2021
(2021/C 491/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1287 




JPY


Japanese yen


127,78 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85128 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2688 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0416 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2943 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,421 




HUF


Hungarian forint


364,43 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5924 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9462 




TRY


Turkish lira


15,5642 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6034 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4437 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8053 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6703 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5456 




KRW


South Korean won


1 333,81 




ZAR


South African rand


18,0231 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,1986 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5265 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 306,04 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7817 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,915 




RUB


Russian rouble


83,3889 




THB


Thai baht


38,252 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4160 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,9694 




INR


Indian rupee


85,1190 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.