do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 November 2021 2021/C 464/04
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021464EN.01001601.xml










17.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 464/16






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 November 2021
(2021/C 464/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1368 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,89 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4367 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84533 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0293 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0528 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8863 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,227 




HUF


Hungarian forint


366,35 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6545 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9493 




TRY


Turkish lira


11,6020 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5490 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4248 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8544 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6186 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5393 




KRW


South Korean won


1 343,00 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3177 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,2627 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5099 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 182,27 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7359 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,225 




RUB


Russian rouble


83,1933 




THB


Thai baht


37,153 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1838 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,4423 




INR


Indian rupee


84,5404 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-430/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — KV v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 — Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition — Eligibility criterion related to professional experience — Compliance of the criterion used by the selection board with the competition notice)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), professional experience, recruitment








C_2022024EN.01002901.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/29






Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — KV v Commission
(Case T-430/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 - Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next stage of the competition - Eligibility criterion related to professional experience - Compliance of the criterion used by the selection board with the competition notice)
(2022/C 24/36)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: KV (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, T. Lilamand and I. Melo Sampaio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment first, of the decision of the selection board of 19 September 2019 refusing the applicant’s request for reconsideration of the decision not to admit him to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AD/371/19 and, second, of the decision of the appointing authority of 31 March 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the selection board of 19 September 2019 rejecting the request for review of KV’s exclusion from Competition EPSO/AD/371/19;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2044 of 17 November 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nostrano Valtrompia’ (PDO))
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Lombardy, designation of origin, hard cheese, labelling, product designation








L_2021418EN.01000401.xml










24.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 418/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/2044
of 17 November 2021
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Nostrano Valtrompia’ (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Nostrano Valtrompia’, registered under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 629/2012 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Nostrano Valtrompia’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 November 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 629/2012 of 06 July 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Nostrano Valtrompia (PDO)] (OJ L 182, 13.7.2012, p. 12).

(3)  
            OJ C 313, 5.8.2021, p. 18.
Case T-735/21: Action brought on 17 November 2021 — Aprile and Commerciale Italiana v EUIPO — DC Comics partnership (Device of a stylized depiction of a black bat inside a white oval frame)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2022037EN.01004601.xml










24.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 37/46






Action brought on 17 November 2021 — Aprile and Commerciale Italiana v EUIPO — DC Comics partnership (Device of a stylized depiction of a black bat inside a white oval frame)
(Case T-735/21)
(2022/C 37/60)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Luigi Aprile (San Giuseppe Vesuviano, Italy), Commerciale Italiana Srl (Nola, Italy) (represented by: C. Saettel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DC Comics partnership (Burbank, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Device of a stylised depiction of a black bat inside a white oval frame) — European Union trade mark No 38 158

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 September 2021 in Case R 1447/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


find the application admissible;










—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs in accordance with Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-247/16 RENV: Order of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Trasta Komercbanka v ECB (Action for annulment — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Action becoming devoid of purpose — Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, banking supervision, financial supervision, powers of the institutions (EU), trade licence








C_2022024EN.01003402.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/34






Order of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Trasta Komercbanka v ECB
(Case T-247/16 RENV) (1)

(Action for annulment - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Action becoming devoid of purpose - Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 24/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Trasta Komercbanka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou and C. Hernández Saseta, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider and M. Petite, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of decision ECB/SSM/2016 — 529900WIP0INFDAWTJ81/1 WOANCA-2016-0005 of the ECB of 3 March 2016, adopted pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) and Article 14(5) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to rule on the action.










2.


Trasta Komercbanka AS and the European Central Bank (ECB) shall bear their own costs.










3.


The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.
Case T-538/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Guasch Pubill v EUIPO — Nap-Kings (Table linen) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing table linen — Disclosure of earlier design — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, textile product








C_2022024EN.01003201.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/32






Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Guasch Pubill v EUIPO — Nap-Kings (Table linen)
(Case T-538/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing table linen - Disclosure of earlier design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2022/C 24/41)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Marcos Guasch Pubill (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón and M. Centell Ribas, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nap-Kings, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Otero Iglesias, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2020 (Case R 1051/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Nap-Kings and Mr Guasch Pubill.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Marcos Guasch Pubill to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 359, 26.10.2020.
Case T-298/19: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Think Schuhwerk v EUIPO (Representation of red shoe lace aglets) (EU Trade Mark — Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoe lace aglets — Rejection of application — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Essentially identical previous application — No res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Right to be heard — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion — Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, medical device, registered trade mark, rights of the defence, trade-mark law








C_2022024EN.01002701.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/27






Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Think Schuhwerk v EUIPO (Representation of red shoe lace aglets)
(Case T-298/19) (1)

(EU Trade Mark - Application for a figurative EU trade mark representing red shoe lace aglets - Rejection of application - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Essentially identical previous application - No res judicata - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Article 95 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2022/C 24/33)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Think Schuhwerk GmbH (Kopfing, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, S. Hanne and M. Eberl, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2019 (Case R 1170/2018-5), concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing red shoe lace aglets as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Think Schuhwerk GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 220, 1.7.2019.
Case T-408/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — KR v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Remuneration — Dependent child allowance — Article 2 of Annex VII of the Statute — Concept of ‘dependent child’ — Refusal to grant dependent child status to a student receiving a grant — Actual maintenance of the child — Health insurance scheme)
Date: 2021-11-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, dependant, family benefit, health insurance, staff regulations (EU), student








C_2022024EN.01002801.xml










17.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/28






Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — KR v Commission
(Case T-408/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Dependent child allowance - Article 2 of Annex VII of the Statute - Concept of ‘dependent child’ - Refusal to grant dependent child status to a student receiving a grant - Actual maintenance of the child - Health insurance scheme)
(2022/C 24/35)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: KR (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 25 October 2019 to no longer consider the applicant’s child as a dependent child, within the meaning of Article 2 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, from 1 September 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders KR to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.