do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-700/21: Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Voco v EUIPO (Shape of packaging)
Date: 2021-11-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, medical device, packaging product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022002EN.01004801.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/48






Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Voco v EUIPO (Shape of packaging)
(Case T-700/21)
(2022/C 2/66)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Voco GmbH (Cuxhaven, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig and S. Pietzcker, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for a three-dimensional EU trade mark (Shape of packaging) — Application for registration No 17 959 421

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 August 2021 in Case R 117/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Court and the Board of Appeal including, in particular, the applicant’s costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-701/21: Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK)
Date: 2021-11-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building industry, parking area, property leasing, real estate business, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2022002EN.01004802.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/48






Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Allessa v EUIPO — Dumerth (CASSELLAPARK)
(Case T-701/21)
(2022/C 2/67)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Allessa GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Fröhlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carim Dumerth (Frankfurt am Main)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CASSELLAPARK — EU word mark No 16 917 429

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2021 in Case R 1043/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of the right to be heard consisting in an adequate statement of reasons;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-703/21: Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa v EUIPO — Falubaz Polska (FALUBAZ)
Date: 2021-11-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, cosmetic product, marketing, prepared foodstuff, registered trade mark, sport, sports equipment, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2022011EN.01003301.xml










10.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/33






Action brought on 2 November 2021 — Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa v EUIPO — Falubaz Polska (FALUBAZ)
(Case T-703/21)
(2022/C 11/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Zielonogórski Klub Żużlowy Sportowa S.A. (Zielona Góra, Poland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Falubaz Polska S.A. spółka komandytowo-akcyjna (Zielona Góra)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FALUBAZ’ — EU trade mark No 14 535 835

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 August 2021 in Case R 1681/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in its entirety;










—


order the unsuccessful party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union and any costs necessarily incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










—


in the event of intervention in the proceedings by the other party, order that party to bear its own costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringements of the principle of free evaluation of evidence through an arbitrary evaluation of the evidence obtained;










—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) (now Article 59(1)(b) of [Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]).






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).