do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1914 of 28 October 2021 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Île-de-France’ (PGI)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Centre-Val de Loire, France, Hauts-de-France, Ile-de-France, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, still wine, white wine








L_2021389EN.01000901.xml










4.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 389/9








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1914
of 28 October 2021
         
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Île-de-France’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Île-de-France’ forwarded by France and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Île-de-France’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Île-de-France’ (PGI) is hereby protected.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 October 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 290, 20.7.2021, p. 20.
Case T-695/21: Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Alauzun and Others v Commission
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: carcinogenic substance, clinical trial, coronavirus disease, drug surveillance, epidemic, market approval, operation of the Institutions, toxic substance, vaccine








C_2022002EN.01004501.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/45






Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Alauzun and Others v Commission
(Case T-695/21)
(2022/C 2/62)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Virginie Alauzun (Saint Cannat, France) and 774 other applicants (represented by: F. Di Vizio, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare that the European Commission (EC) unlawfully failed to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for the mRNA-technology vaccines;










—


order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the preclinical phase for mRNA-technology vaccines not yet authorised under the EMA procedure;










—


order the European Commission to include carcinogenicity and genotoxicity testing in the pharmacovigilance phase for mRNA-technology vaccines already authorised under the EMA procedure;










—


request the Commission to disclose the following information:






—


the clear legislative basis as to why the testing at issue was not included in the preclinical and pharmacovigilance testing phases;










—


the regulation setting out the mandatory checks required for the authorisation of mRNA-technology vaccines.














—


order the European Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants allege an infringement of EU law and a failure to act on the part of the Commission. The applicants submit in that regard that the Commission did not comply with its obligation arising under Article 168 TFEU to guarantee a ‘high level of human health protection’ by granting a conditional marketing authorisation to mRNA-technology vaccines in the absence of carcinogenicity and genotoxicity studies.
Corrigendum to the Call for expression of interest – Financial Auditors – Junior Professionals Programme – Temporary staff (grade AD 6) (OJ C 400 A, 4.10.2021)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: administrator, audit, competition (EU), financial audit, recruitment, servant (EU), temporary employment








CA2021435EN.01000101.xml










28.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 435/1






CORRIGENDUM TO THE CALL FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST – FINANCIAL AUDITORS – JUNIOR PROFESSIONALS PROGRAMME
Temporary staff (grade AD 6)
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 400 A of 4 October 2021
)
(2021/C 435 A/01)
On page 2, under point ‘2. Qualifications’:

for:

‘In accordance with Article 10(1) of the CEOS:






(i)


a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years, as attested by a diploma obtained no more than six years prior to the deadline for applications for this call; or










(ii)


where justified in the interests of the service, professional training of an equivalent level undertaken no more than six years prior to the deadline for applications for this call.




In addition to the above, candidates must also have either:






—


a Master’s degree in the field of audit, accounting, statistics, mathematics, business administration, finance or economics, or










—


a professional qualification in the field of audit or accounting (ACCA, CIA, etc.).’,





read:

‘In accordance with Article 10(1) of the CEOS, candidates must possess, on the date of their application:






(i)


a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years, as attested by a diploma obtained no more than eight (8) years prior to the deadline for applications for this call; or










(ii)


where justified in the interests of the service, professional training of an equivalent level undertaken no more than eight (8) years prior to the deadline for applications for this call.




A Master’s degree (MSc) in the field of audit, accounting, statistics, mathematics, business administration, finance or economics or a professional qualification in the field of audit or accounting (ACCA, CIA, etc.), would be considered an asset.’
On page 3, under ‘Applications’:

for:‘
The deadline for applications is 12.00 (midday) CET on 29 October 2021.
’,

read:‘
The deadline for applications is 12.00 (midday) CET on 30 November 2021.
’
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10482 – CVC / CARLYLE / CFGI EAGLE PARENT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 470/01
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: accounting, consultancy, economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control








C_2021470EN.01000101.xml










22.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 470/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10482 – CVC / CARLYLE / CFGI EAGLE PARENT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 470/01)
On 28 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10482. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-696/21: Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Les Bordes Golf International v EUIPO — Mast-Jägermeister (LES BORDES)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, clothing, cosmetic product, hotel industry, personal effects, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile product, trade-mark law








C_2022002EN.01004601.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/46






Action brought on 28 October 2021 — Les Bordes Golf International v EUIPO — Mast-Jägermeister (LES BORDES)
(Case T-696/21)
(2022/C 2/63)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Les Bordes Golf International (Saint-Laurent-Nouan, France) (represented by: M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mast-Jägermeister SE (Wolfenbüttel, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark LES BORDES — Application for registration No 18 082 876

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 September 2021 in Case R 67/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


to reinstate the decision of 17 April 2020 of the Opposition Division in Opposition No B 3 094 876; and










—


order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-650/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2021 — Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission (Appeal — Action for damages — Non-contractual liability — Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument — Decentralised management — Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) — On-the-spot checks — Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 — Article 7 — Access to computer data — Digital forensic operation — Legitimate expectations — Right to be heard — Non-material damage)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU control, EU financial instrument, European Anti-fraud Office, damages, digital evidence, indemnification, pre-accession aid, public procurement, rights of the defence, third country








C_2022002EN.01000302.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/3






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 October 2021 — Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission
(Case C-650/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Action for damages - Non-contractual liability - Pre-Accession Assistance Instrument - Decentralised management - Investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) - On-the-spot checks - Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 - Article 7 - Access to computer data - Digital forensic operation - Legitimate expectations - Right to be heard - Non-material damage)
(2022/C 2/04)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: Vialto Consulting Kft. (represented by: D. Sigalas and S. Paliou, dikigoroi)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, J. Baquero Cruz and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2019, Vialto Consulting v Commission (T-617/17, not published, EU:T:2019:446) in so far as it rejected as unfounded the complaint raised by Vialto Consulting Kft. concerning the European Commission’s infringement of the right to be heard;










2.


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3.


Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for a ruling on the conditions for incurring the non-contractual liability of the European Union relating to the existence of a causal link between the infringement by the European Commission of the right to be heard and the damage complained of, as well as the fact of damage;










4.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1912 of 28 October 2021 approving amendments to the specification for a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication ‘Ardèche’ (PGI)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Occitanie, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine, white wine








L_2021389EN.01000701.xml










4.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 389/7








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1912
of 28 October 2021
         
approving amendments to the specification for a protected designation of origin or a protected geographical indication ‘Ardèche’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Ardèche’, submitted pursuant to Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(2)


The Commission published the application for the approval of amendments to the specification in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), as required by Article 97(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(4)


The amendments to the specification should therefore be approved in accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Ardèche’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 October 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 288, 19.7.2021, p. 20.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1772 of 28 June 2021 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom (Official Journal of the European Union L 360 of 11 October 2021)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, natural person, personal data, protection of privacy








L_2021382EN.01005501.xml










28.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 382/55







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1772 of 28 June 2021 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 360 of 11 October 2021
)


The title is corrected as follows:
for:


                  ‘Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1772 of 28 June 2021 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom’,

read:


                  ‘Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1772 of 28 June 2021 pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the adequate protection of personal data by the United Kingdom’.
Case C-654/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 October 2021 — LM v KP
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022064EN.01001401.xml










7.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 28 October 2021 — LM v KP
(Case C-654/21)
(2022/C 64/22)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimant and counter-defendant: LM

Defendant and counter-claimant: KP

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 124(d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark, (1) read in conjunction with Article 128(1) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘counterclaim for … a declaration of invalidity’ contained in those provisions may mean a [counter]claim for a declaration of invalidity only to the extent that that counterclaim is connected with the claimant’s EU trade mark infringement claim, thus allowing a national court not to hear a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity the scope of which is broader than that connected with the claimant’s infringement claim?










2.


Must Article 129(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark be interpreted as meaning that the provision in question, which concerns ‘the rules of procedure governing the same type of action relating to a national trade mark’, refers to the national rules of procedure which would be applicable to specific proceedings concerning infringement of an EU trade mark (and to proceedings resulting from a statement of counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity), or does it refer generally to the national rules of procedure present in the legal order of a Member State, this being relevant in cases where, on account of the date on which the specific proceedings concerning infringement of an EU trade mark were initiated, the rules of procedure governing a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity of a trade mark relating to national trade marks were not present in the legal order of a given Member State?






(1)  OJ 2017 L 154, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/616 of 13 April 2021 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benalaxyl, benalaxyl-M, dichlobenil, fluopicolide, proquinazid and pyridalyl in or on certain products (Official Journal of the European Union L 131 of 16 April 2021)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer protection, crop production, food inspection, food safety, foodstuff, pesticide, pesticide residue








L_2021382EN.01005701.xml










28.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 382/57







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2021/616 of 13 April 2021 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for benalaxyl, benalaxyl-M, dichlobenil, fluopicolide, proquinazid and pyridalyl in or on certain products

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 131 of 16 April 2021
)


Between pages 17 and 29, in eight separate instances:
for:


                  ‘[Office of Publication: please insert date 2 years after publication]’,

read:


                  ‘
                  16 April 2023
                  ’
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1915 of 28 October 2021 conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Urueña’ (PDO)
Date: 2021-10-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Castile-Leon, Spain, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, red wine, rosé wine








L_2021389EN.01001001.xml










4.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 389/10








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1915
of 28 October 2021
         
conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Urueña’ (PDO)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Urueña’ forwarded by Spain and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.












(3)


In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Urueña’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Urueña’ (PDO) is hereby protected.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 28 October 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ C 139, 20.4.2021, p. 21.