do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-329/20: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendant (jewellery)) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a pendant (jewellery) — Maintenance of the Community design in an amended form — Article 25(6) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, jewellery and goldsmith's articles








C_2021513EN.01002701.xml










20.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 513/27






Order of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — 4B Company v EUIPO — Deenz (Pendant (jewellery))
(Case T-329/20) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a pendant (jewellery) - Maintenance of the Community design in an amended form - Article 25(6) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 513/40)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: 4B Company Srl (Montegiorgio, Italy) (represented by: G. Brogi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Scardocchia and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Deenz Holding Ltd (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: N. Alberti, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2020 (Case R 2449/2018-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between 4B Company and Deenz Holding.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


4B Company Srl shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10476 – SCHWARZ GROUP / CESPA) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 461/02
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, waste management








C_2021461EN.01000201.xml










15.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 461/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10476 – SCHWARZ GROUP / CESPA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 461/02)
On 25 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10476. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10314 – VINCI / ENERGIA Y SERVICIOS DINSA II) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 27/03
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: airport, building industry, building services, economic concentration, energy industry, information technology, merger control, motorway, service concession, transport infrastructure








C_2022027EN.01000301.xml










19.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10314 – VINCI / ENERGIA Y SERVICIOS DINSA II)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 27/03)
On 25 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10314. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 22 October 2021 2021/C 430/06
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021430EN.01000601.xml










25.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 430/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

22 October 2021
(2021/C 430/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1630 




JPY


Japanese yen


132,43 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4405 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84370 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,9748 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0668 




ISK


Iceland króna


150,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7075 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,655 




HUF


Hungarian forint


363,52 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5975 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9454 




TRY


Turkish lira


11,1830 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5510 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4341 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0412 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6257 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5669 




KRW


South Korean won


1 368,39 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0626 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4337 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5265 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 500,43 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8265 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,084 




RUB


Russian rouble


81,8586 




THB


Thai baht


38,763 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6304 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,5402 




INR


Indian rupee


87,0740 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-690/21: Action brought on 25 October 2021 — LW Capital v Commission
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy efficiency, energy law, energy production








C_2021513EN.01003501.xml










20.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 513/35






Action brought on 25 October 2021 — LW Capital v Commission
(Case T-690/21)
(2021/C 513/49)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: LW Capital (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Ziegler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


partially annul the Commission’s Decision of 3 June 2021 on State aid SA.56826 (2020/N) — Germany — [2020 reform of support for cogeneration] (Reform of the German Combined Heat and Power Generation Act 2020 (‘KWKG’)) and State aid SA.53308 (2019/N) — Germany — Change of support to existing CHP plants 2019 (§ 13 KWKG) (OJ 2021 C 306, pp. 1 and 2), to the extent that it does not raise concerns in respect of (i) the support of CHP electricity generation in new, modernised and retrofitted high-efficiency CHP installations and (ii) the support of CHP electricity generation in existing highly efficient gas-fired CHP installations in the district heating sector;










—


order the Commission to bear its own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law.
By its single plea, the applicant challenges the decision at issue for ‘infringement of the Treaties or of any rule of law relating to their application’ within the meaning of the fourth paragraph read in conjunction with the second paragraph of Article 263 TFEU. That infringement consists in the fact that the Commission should have had concerns in relation to the compatibility of the KWKG 2020 aid scheme proposed by Germany and would therefore have been under an obligation to open the formal investigation procedure in accordance with Article 108(2) TFEU. As the Commission failed to act, it infringed the procedural rights of the applicant.
The applicant alleges the infringement of procedural rights under Article 108(2) in conjunction with the infringement of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU and infringements of the principles of non-discrimination, proportionality and legitimate expectations, as well as an error of assessment of the facts.
Case T-686/21: Action brought on 25 October 2021 — energy cake v EUIPO — Foodtastic (ENERGY CAKE)
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, cereal product, confectionery product, foodstuff, registered trade mark, retail trade, sports equipment, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2021513EN.01003201.xml










20.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 513/32






Action brought on 25 October 2021 — energy cake v EUIPO — Foodtastic (ENERGY CAKE)
(Case T-686/21)
(2021/C 513/46)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: energy cake GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Bernegger, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Foodtastic GmbH (Dortmund, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘ENERGY CAKE’ — European Union trade mark No 14 808 935

Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2021 in Case R 2324/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-297/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — Troy Chemical Company and Troy v Commission (Interim measures — Biocidal products — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 — Approval of carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 (film preservatives) and 10 (masonry preservatives) — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: abuse of power, biocide, equal treatment, market approval, paints and varnishes, plaster








C_2021513EN.01002901.xml










20.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 513/29






Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2021 — Troy Chemical Company and Troy v Commission
(Case T-297/21 R)
(Interim measures - Biocidal products - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 - Approval of carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 (film preservatives) and 10 (masonry preservatives) - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2021/C 513/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Troy Chemical Company BV (Delft, Netherlands), Troy Corp. (Florham Park, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: D. Abrahams, H. Widemann and L. Gorywoda, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lindenthal and M. Farley, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, suspension of operation of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/348 of 25 February 2021 approving carbendazim as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 7 and 10 (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 174), and, second, the grant of any other interim measures which the General Court considers appropriate.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 430/08
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: City of Zagreb, County of Dubrovnik-Neretva, County of Istra, County of Osijek-Baranja, County of Primorje-Gorski Kotar, County of Split-Dalmatia, County of Zadar, Croatia, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2021430EN.01000801.xml










25.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 430/8






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 430/08)






Member State


Republic of Croatia




Route(s) concerned








 


Dubrovnik – Zagreb – Dubrovnik










 


Split – Zagreb – Split










 


Zagreb – Zadar – Pula – Zadar – Zagreb










 


Zagreb – Brač – Zagreb










 


Osijek – Dubrovnik – Osijek










 


Osijek – Split – Osijek










 


Osijek – Zagreb – Osijek










 


Osijek – Pula – Split – Pula – Osijek










 


Osijek – Rijeka – Osijek










 


Rijeka – Split – Dubrovnik – Split – Rijeka










 


Rijeka – Zadar – Rijeka










 


Osijek – Zadar – Osijek








Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 May 2022




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information, please contact:





Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure




Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Electronic Communications and Post




Prisavlje 14




10000 Zagreb




REPUBLIC OF CROATIA




Tel. +385 16169060
Fax +385 16196393
Email: PSO@caacro.hr
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/1899 of 25 October 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ (PGI))
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, Western Transdanubia, designation of origin, fresh vegetable, labelling, product designation, root vegetable








L_2021387EN.01007701.xml










3.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 387/77








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/1899
of 25 October 2021
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Fertőd vidéki sárgarépa’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 25 October 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 283, 15.7.2021, p. 12.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10357 – VINCI / EIFFAGE / SMTPC) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 461/01
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, service concession, tunnel








C_2021461EN.01000101.xml










15.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 461/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10357 – VINCI / EIFFAGE / SMTPC)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 461/01)
On 25 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10357. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea 2021/C 430/04
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Guinea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021430EN.01000401.xml










25.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 430/4






Notice for the attention of the persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea
(2021/C 430/04)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867 (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 (3).
The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Decision 2010/638/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea and should therefore remain subject to the measures, as renewed by Decision (CFSP) 2021/1867.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 1284/2009, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 8 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation before 30 June 2022, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 280 26.10.2010, p. 10.

(2)  OJ L 377, 25.10.2021, p. 34.

(3)  OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.
Annual reports on the implementation of the EU budget and on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds for the 2020 financial year 2021/C 430/07
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Development Fund, audit, closing of accounts, financial management, general budget (EU), implementation of the budget








C_2021430EN.01000701.xml










25.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 430/7






Annual reports on the implementation of the EU budget and on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds for the 2020 financial year
(2021/C 430/07)
The European Court of Auditors will publish its annual reports for the 2020 financial year on the implementation of the EU budget and on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds, together with the institutions’ replies, on 26 October 2021.
The reports can be consulted directly or downloaded, from 00:01 on 26 October 2021, at the European Court of Auditors’ website:
https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=58665
The following link to an overview of the annual reports and related documents will become active at the same time:
https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/AR2020.aspx
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10454 – OMERS / GOLDMAN SACHS / AMEDES) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 446/01
Date: 2021-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, clinical trial, economic concentration, health care, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2021446EN.01000101.xml










3.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 446/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10454 – OMERS / GOLDMAN SACHS / AMEDES)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 446/01)
On 25 October 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10454. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.