do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Recruitment Notice PE/255/S — English-language clear language professional (AD 7) (female or male) (OJ C 74 A, 3.3.2021)
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, legislative drafting, linguistics








CA2021396EN.01000101.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 396/1






Corrigendum to Recruitment Notice PE/255/S — English-language clear language professional (AD 7) (female or male)
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 74 A of 3 March 2021
)
(2021/C 396 A/01)
On page 4, in Section B.3 Tests, Written tests:







for:









‘(b)


English drafting test: drafting a summary in English intended for the general public of a press release or an excerpt from a study in language 2. The objective of this test is to assess your knowledge of language 2 and your ability to identify the main points of a text and summarise them in clear language.
Maximum time allowed: 30 minutes
Marking: 0 to 40 points (pass mark: 20)










(c)


English drafting test: drafting a summary in English intended for the general public of a press release or an excerpt from a study in language 3. The objective of this test is to assess your knowledge of language 3 and your ability to identify the main points of a text and summarise them in clear language.
Maximum time allowed: 30 minutes
Marking: 0 to 40 points (pass mark: 20)’,















read:









‘(b)


English drafting test: drafting a summary in English intended for the general public of a press release or an excerpt from a study in language 2. The objective of this test is to assess your knowledge of language 2 and your ability to identify the main points of a text and summarise them in clear language.
Maximum time allowed: 45 minutes
Marking: 0 to 40 points (pass mark: 20)










(c)


English drafting test: drafting a summary in English intended for the general public of a press release or an excerpt from a study in language 3. The objective of this test is to assess your knowledge of language 3 and your ability to identify the main points of a text and summarise them in clear language.
Maximum time allowed: 45 minutes
Marking: 0 to 40 points (pass mark: 20)’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10371 – SIBUR / TAIF) (Text with EEA relevance) 2022/C 44/03
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, energy industry, gas industry, merger control, oil industry, petrochemicals








C_2022044EN.01001701.xml










28.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/17






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10371 – SIBUR / TAIF)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2022/C 44/03)
On 30 September 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10371. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-296/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Commerzbank AG v E.O. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments — Civil and commercial matters — Lugano II Convention — Article 15(1)(c) — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by the convention)
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil procedure, consumer, contract, international convention, judicial cooperation, jurisdiction, legal domicile








C_2021481EN.01001401.xml










29.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 481/14






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Commerzbank AG v E.O.
(Case C-296/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments - Civil and commercial matters - Lugano II Convention - Article 15(1)(c) - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by the convention)
(2021/C 481/19)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Commerzbank AG

Defendant: E.O.

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1)(c) of the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, signed on 30 October 2007, the conclusion of which was approved on behalf of the European Community by Council Decision 2009/430/EC of 27 November 2008, must be interpreted as meaning that that provision determines jurisdiction where the parties to a consumer contract — the consumer and the professional counterparty — were, at the time that contract was concluded, domiciled in the same State bound by that convention, and where an international element in the legal relationship emerged only after that contract was concluded, on account of the subsequent transfer of the consumer’s domicile to another State bound by that convention.


(1)  OJ C 348, 19.10.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 396/05
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, audiovisual production, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2021396EN.01000501.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/5






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 396/05)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


24.6.2021




Case No


87015




Decision No


169/21/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 amendment to the scheme for producers of cultural films




Legal basis


Regulation on aid to audio-visual production




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


To ensure that the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 outbreak do not undermine the viability of producers of cultural films and the future production of cultural film




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


NOK 10 million




Intensity


A grant of up to 100 % of the estimated loss of income from box-office revenue from 13.3.2020 to 31.10.2020




Duration


24.6.2021 – 31.12.2021




Economic sectors


Audiovisual production




Name and address of the granting authority







Norwegian Film Institute




P.O. Box 482




N-0105 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case C-612/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, contract, improvement of housing, municipality, ownership, renewable energy, tax law, taxpayer








C_2022095EN.01000603.xml










28.2.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 30 September 2021 — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
(Case C-612/21)
(2022/C 95/10)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Gmina O.

Defendant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Questions referred







1.


Must the provisions of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, (1) in particular Articles 2(1), 9(1) and 13(1) thereof, be interpreted as meaning that a municipality (a public authority) acts as a taxable person for VAT purposes in carrying out a project whose objective is to increase the proportion of renewable energy sources by means of entering into a civil-law contract with property owners, under which the municipality undertakes to install renewable energy source systems on their property and — after a certain period of time has elapsed — to transfer the ownership of those systems to the property owners?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, must European co-financing received by a municipality (a public authority) for the implementation of projects involving renewable energy sources be included in the taxable amount within the meaning of Article 73 of that directive?






(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations 2021/C 396/09
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Iceland, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2021396EN.01000901.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/9






EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation 1008/2008 of the European parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(2021/C 396/09)






Member State


Iceland




Concerned routes


Flight routes:






1.


Akureyri – Grímsey – Akureyri










2.


Akureyri – Vopnafjörður – Þórshöfn – Akureyri








Period of validity of the contract


1 April 2022 – 31 March 2025 with a possibility of two years extension




Deadline for submission of tenders


Two months from the publication of this notice




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the modified public service obligations can be obtained







Vegagerðin




Suðurhrauni 3




210 Garðabæ




IS-ICELAND




Contact: Ólafur Þór Leifsson
Email: othl@vegagerdin.is
tel. +354 8921516
https://tendsign.is/






—



Nr.21-058 Áætlunarflug á Íslandi - Sérleyfi í flugi fyrir Vegagerðina











—



No.21-058 Scheduled Air Service in Iceland – Concession in Air routes for Vegagerdin/The Icelandic Road and Coastal Administration (IRCA)
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 396/04
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, airport, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2021396EN.01000401.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/4






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 396/04)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


18 June 2021




Case No


87003




Decision No


135/21/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 aid scheme for airport operators




Legal basis


Decisions adopted by the Norwegian Parliament and public guidelines issued by the Ministry of Transport that will contain all the relevant conditions of the measures




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Compensate for uncovered fixed costs and thereby limit the damage caused by the COVID-19 pandemic




Form of aid


Grants




Budget


Estimated NOK 212,5 million




Intensity


70-90 %




Duration


1 January – 31 December 2021




Economic sectors


Airport sector




Name and address of the granting authority







The Ministry of Transport




P.O. Box 8010 Dep




N-0030 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case T-627/21: Action brought on 30 September 2021 — Segimerus v EUIPO — Karsten Manufacturing (MONSOON)
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, insurance, real estate business, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law, vehicle








C_2021471EN.01005802.xml










22.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 471/58






Action brought on 30 September 2021 — Segimerus v EUIPO — Karsten Manufacturing (MONSOON)
(Case T-627/21)
(2021/C 471/83)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Segimerus Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Karsten Manufacturing Corp. (Phoenix, Arizona, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark MONSOON — EU trade mark No 10 469 906

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 July 2021 in Case R 1125/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 59(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-634/21: Action brought on 30 September 2021 — Rimini Street v EUIPO (WE DO SUPPORT)
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, database, maintenance, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2021502EN.01003501.xml










13.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 502/35






Action brought on 30 September 2021 — Rimini Street v EUIPO (WE DO SUPPORT)
(Case T-634/21)
(2021/C 502/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Rimini Street, Inc. (Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) (represented by: E. Ratjen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark WE DO SUPPORT — Application for registration No 1 559 178

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 August 2021 in Case R 710/2021-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 396/07
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: Norway, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2021396EN.01000701.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/7






EFTA Surveillance Authority communication pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 396/07)






Member State


Norway




Concerned routes








—


Routes between Kirkenes, Vadsø, Vardø, Båtsfjord, Berlevåg, Mehamn, Honningsvåg, Hammerfest and Alta










—


Hasvik – Tromsø v.v., Hasvik – Hammerfest v.v., Sørkjosen – Tromsø v.v.










—


Lakselv – Tromsø v.v.










—


Andenes – Bodø v.v., Andenes – Tromsø v.v.










—


Harstad/Narvik – Tromsø v.v.










—


Harstad/Narvik – Bodø v.v.










—


Stokmarknes – Tromsø v.v.










—


Stokmarknes – Bodø v.v.










—


Leknes – Bodø v.v.










—


Svolvær – Bodø v.v.










—


Røst – Bodø v.v.










—


Brønnøysund – Bodø v.v., Brønnøysund – Trondheim v.v.










—


Sandnessjøen – Bodø v.v., Sandnessjøen – Trondheim v.v.










—


Mo i Rana – Bodø v.v., Mo i Rana – Trondheim v.v.










—


Mosjøen – Bodø v.v., Mosjøen – Trondheim v.v.










—


Namsos – Trondheim v.v., Rørvik – Trondheim v.v.








Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1.4.2022




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the modified public service obligations can be obtained


The Norwegian Ministry of Transport
Find document - regjeringen.no
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 396/03
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, sporting event








C_2021396EN.01000301.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/3






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 396/03)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


16.6.2021




Case No


86973




Decision No


127/21/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 aid scheme for organisers of sports events of national importance




Legal basis


Regulation on a temporary scheme for events of national importance in the sports sector




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


To ensure that sports events of national importance can take place




Form of aid


Direct grants




Budget


NOK 620 million




Intensity


For events that take place as planned, a grant of up to 70 %
For cancelled events the grant may be up to 50 %




Duration


1.7.2021 – 31.10.2021




Economic sectors


Voluntary sectors – Organisers of sports events exclusively




Name and address of the granting authority







Norwegian Gaming and Foundation Authority




P.O. Box 800




N-6805 Førde




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2021/C 396/12
Date: 2021-09-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, chemical compound, import (EU), originating product








C_2021396EN.01001201.xml










30.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 396/12






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2021/C 396/12)

1.   

As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.


2.   Procedure

Union producers may submit a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.








4.


This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Melamine


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1171 of 30 June 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of melamine originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council
(OJ L 170, 1.7.2017, p. 62)


2.7.2022










(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight (00:00) of the day mentioned in this column.