do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-305/20: Order of the General Court of 9 August 2021 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO — Google (LOOP) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, research, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2021422EN.01001602.xml










18.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 422/16






Order of the General Court of 9 August 2021 — Telefónica Germany v EUIPO — Google (LOOP)
(Case T-305/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 422/23)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Google LLC (Mountain View, California, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey, C. Schmitt and S. Clotten, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2020 (Case R 281/2019-4), relating to cancellation proceedings between Google and Telefónica Germany.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Telefónica Germany GmbH & Co. OHG and Google LLC are ordered to bear their own costs and each to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10359 — Carsales Holdings/Goldman Sachs/Eurazeo/Open Road) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 328/01
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, electronic commerce, investment company, merger control, motor car, two-wheeled vehicle, vehicle








C_2021328EN.01000101.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10359 — Carsales Holdings/Goldman Sachs/Eurazeo/Open Road)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 328/01)
On 9 August 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10359. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 6 August 2021 2021/C 318/02
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021318EN.01000201.xml










9.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 318/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

6 August 2021
(2021/C 318/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1807 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,64 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4371 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,84840 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1683 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0724 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,4230 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,413 




HUF


Hungarian forint


352,72 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5563 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9160 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,1385 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5968 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4763 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1827 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6737 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5952 




KRW


South Korean won


1 349,15 




ZAR


South African rand


17,0983 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6379 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4978 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 934,12 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9814 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,644 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,4194 




THB


Thai baht


39,359 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1594 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,5178 




INR


Indian rupee


87,4993 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-481/21: Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Foz v Council
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021412EN.01002101.xml










11.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 412/21






Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Foz v Council
(Case T-481/21)
(2021/C 412/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Samer Foz (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: L. Cloquet, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Decision 2021/855 (CFSP) of the Council of the EU of 27 May 2021 amending Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 May 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria (1), as far as it applies to the applicant;










—


annul Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/848 of the Council of the EU of 27 May 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (2), as far as it applies to the applicant; and










—


order the Council to pay full costs and expenses of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law. The applicant alleges that the Council made a manifest error in assessing the facts by considering that the applicant is supporting the Syrian regime and benefiting from it and by considering that the applicant is a leading businessperson operating in Syria.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/855 of 27 May 2021 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2021 L 188, p. 90).

(2)  Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/848 of 27 May 2021 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (OJ 2021 L 188, p. 18).
Case C-435/20: Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 9 August 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht — Germany) — C. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, EU migration policy, Switzerland, asylum seeker, migrant, refugee, right of asylum








C_2021471EN.01003204.xml










22.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 471/32






Order of the President of the Ninth Chamber of the Court of 9 August 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Schleswig-Holsteinisches Verwaltungsgericht — Germany) — C. v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(Case C-435/20) (1)

(2021/C 471/44)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Case T-478/21: Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Les Éditions P. Amaury v EUIPO — Golden Balls (BALLON D’OR)
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cultural event, education, paper, paperboard, precious metal, registered trade mark, sporting event, telecommunications equipment, trade-mark law








C_2021382EN.01003501.xml










20.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/35






Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Les Éditions P. Amaury v EUIPO — Golden Balls (BALLON D’OR)
(Case T-478/21)
(2021/C 382/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Les Éditions P. Amaury (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and M. Laborde, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Golden Balls Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark BALLON D’OR — European Union trade mark No 4 226 148

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 June 2021 in Case R 1073/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


partially set aside the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009.
Case T-477/21: Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Glaxo Group v EUIPO — Cipla Europe (Shape of an inhaler)
Date: 2021-08-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021382EN.01003401.xml










20.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/34






Action brought on 9 August 2021 — Glaxo Group v EUIPO — Cipla Europe (Shape of an inhaler)
(Case T-477/21)
(2021/C 382/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Glaxo Group Ltd (Brentford, United Kingdom) (represented by: T. de Haan and F. Verhoestraete, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cipla Europe NV (Antwerp, Belgium)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trademark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union tridimensional mark (Shape of an inhaler) — European Union trade mark No 2 179 562

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 May 2021 in Case R 1835/2016-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s First Board of Appeal.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Articles 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and 41(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) 40/94;










—


Infringement of Article 52(2) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009.