do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10321 — DSV/Agility) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 311/01
Date: 2021-07-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air transport, carriage for hire or reward, economic concentration, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, provision of services, road transport, supply chain








C_2021311EN.01000101.xml










3.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10321 — DSV/Agility)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 311/01)
On 28 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10321. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10260 — Lactalis/Leerdammer) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 301/07
Date: 2021-07-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: cheese factory, dairy industry, economic concentration, merger control








C_2021301EN.01000901.xml










28.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 301/9






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10260 — Lactalis/Leerdammer)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 301/07)

1.   
On 22 July 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration, pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Lactalis Group (‘Lactalis’, France); and










—


La Cible (‘Leerdammer’, Netherlands) (2).




Lactalis acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, sole control of the whole of Leerdammer.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


Lactalis: production and distribution of milk and dairy products, in particular cheeses, cream, butter, desserts and extra-fresh dairy products; and










—


Leerdammer: production and distribution of cheeses under the ‘Leerdammer’ brand.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit any observations they may have on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10260 — Lactalis/Leerdammer
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  La Cible comprises a set of assets of the Bel Group (Royal Bel Leerdammer, Bel Italia, Bel Deutschland and the Ukrainian business of the Bel Group, Bel Shostka Ukraine), whose main activity is the production and sale of cheeses under the Leerdammer brand.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 227/2021 of 28 July 2021 amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement [2024/272]
Date: 2021-07-28
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, physician, professional qualifications, recognition of diplomas, recognition of vocational training qualifications, revision of an agreement




L_202400272EN.000101.fmx.xml












Official Journal of the European Union


EN
Series L













2024/272


8.2.2024







            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 227/2021
of 28 July 2021
         
amending Annex VII (Recognition of professional qualifications) to the EEA Agreement [2024/272]


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Iceland has notified the EFTA Surveillance Authority of updates to legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions with regard to the issuing of evidence of formal qualifications in the fields covered by Chapter III of Directive 2005/36/EC (Doctor of medicine). In accordance with Article 21a(4) of Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1), as incorporated into Annex VII to the EEA Agreement, the EFTA Surveillance Authority has adopted a Recommendation on 29 June 2021 (2) indicating such notified changes. For reasons of clarity and legal certainty, these updates should be reflected in the relevant adaptation to Directive 2005/36/EC contained in Annex VII to the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex VII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In point 1 (Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex VII to the EEA Agreement, in the table under point (E)(a)(i), the row starting with the word “Ísland” is replaced by the following:










‘Ísland


Embættispróf í læknisfræði, candidatus medicinae (cand. med.)


Háskóli Íslands


Not applicable


1 January 1994’







Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on 28 July 2021, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).
It shall apply from 15 April 2021.


Article 3
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 28 July 2021.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Per SJAASTAD
            





(1)  
            OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p. 22.

(2)  Decision of the EFTA Surveillance Authority No 173/21/COL of 29 June 2021.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/272/oj
ISSN 1977-0677 (electronic edition)
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10232 — Brose/Sitech) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 370/04
Date: 2021-07-28
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2021370EN.01000401.xml










15.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 370/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10232 — Brose/Sitech)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 370/04)
On 28 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10232. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-646/20: Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — NG and Others v Parliament and Council (Action for annulment — Road transport — Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 — Driver’s rest periods — Impossibility of taking certain rest periods in the vehicle — Return to the employer’s operational centre or to the place of residence for certain rest periods — Professional association — Standing to bring proceedings — Act not of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-07-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, drivers, driving period, equal treatment, international road transport, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, rest period, road safety, working conditions








C_2021412EN.01001101.xml










11.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 412/11






Order of the General Court of 28 July 2021 — NG and Others v Parliament and Council
(Case T-646/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Road transport - Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 - Driver’s rest periods - Impossibility of taking certain rest periods in the vehicle - Return to the employer’s operational centre or to the place of residence for certain rest periods - Professional association - Standing to bring proceedings - Act not of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 412/10)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: NG and 17 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: R. Martens, lawyer)

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: R. van de Westelaken and A. Tamás, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Norberg, L. Vétillard and S. Emmerechts, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Article 1(6)(c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (OJ 2020 L 249, p. 1).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


NG and the other parties whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.