Case T-411/21: Action brought on 8 July 2021 — Alfa Acciai v Commission
Date: 2021-07-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, bar, cartel, concrete, damages, fixing of prices, interest, limitation of legal proceedings, price agreement, sanction (EU)








C_2021401EN.01001001.xml










4.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/10






Action brought on 8 July 2021 — Alfa Acciai v Commission
(Case T-411/21)
(2021/C 401/12)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Alfa Acciai SpA (Brescia, Italy) (represented by: D. Fosselard, D. Slater and G. Carnazza, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






— (i)


order the European Union, represented by the Commission, to pay default interest on the amount of EUR 7 175 000 at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its principal refinancing operations in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the deadline falls, increased by three and a half percentage points, in respect of the period between 9 March 2010 and 14 November 2017, less interest in the amount of EUR 260 968,15 which has already been received by the applicant, which amounts to a total of EUR 2 222 073,29 or, in the alternative, to pay default interest calculated at the interest rate that the Court considers appropriate;










— (ii)


order the European Union, represented by the Commission, to pay default interest on the amount requested in point (i) above in respect of the period between 14 November 2017 and the date on which that amount is actually paid, at the rate set by the ECB for its principal refinancing operations in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the deadline falls, increased by three and a half percentage points, or, in the alternative, at the interest rate that the Court considers appropriate;










— (iii)


as an alternative to point (ii) above, order the European Union, represented by the Commission, to pay default interest on the amount requested in point (i) in respect of the period between 2 March 2021 and the date on which that amount is actually paid, at the rate set by the ECB for its principal refinancing operations in force on the first calendar day of the month in which the deadline falls, increased by three and a half percentage points, or, in the alternative, at the interest rate that the Court considers appropriate;










— (iv)


in addition or in the alternative, annul Commission communication Ref. Ares(2021) 2904247 of 30 April 2021;










— (v)


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, concerning the application for compensation, alleging incorrect execution by the Commission of the judgment of 21 September 2017, Ferriera Valsabbia and Others v Commission (C-86/15 P and C-87/15 P, EU:C:2017:717) contrary to the first paragraph of Article 266 TFEU and Article 41(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
In this regard, the applicant claims that the Commission has not paid the entire amount of default interest on the penalty repaid following the judgment.










2.


Second plea in law, concerning the application for annulment, alleging infringement and incorrect assessment of Articles 266 and 296 TFEU, infringement and incorrect assessment of Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, a failure to state reasons in the Commission’s letter of 30 April 2021, and an error in law and manifest error of assessment.
In this regard, the applicant claims that the letter, in which the Commission refused to pay default interest to the applicants, does not contain a sufficient statement of reasons and infringes the principles of limitation.










3.


Third plea in law, concerning the application for annulment, alleging infringement and incorrect assessment of Article 266 TFEU and of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012. (1)

In this regard, the applicant claims that Article 85a(2) of Delegated Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, (2) relied on by the Commission in its letter of 30 April 2021, was no longer in force when the penalty was repaid, and therefore was no longer applicable.






(1)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012 of 29 October 2012 on the rules of application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (OJ 2012 L 362, p. 1).

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 357, p. 1).