do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-384/21: Action brought on 7 July 2021 — Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel and Others v SRB
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, company in difficulties, equal treatment, financing plan, fund (EU), principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, right to justice








C_2021338EN.01003101.xml










23.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/31






Action brought on 7 July 2021 — Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel and Others v SRB
(Case T-384/21)
(2021/C 338/40)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel (Paris, France) and 26 other applicants (represented by: A. Gosset-Grainville, M. Trabucchi and M. Dalon, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Decision SRB/ES/2021/22 of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex-ante contributions to the SRF in so far as it concerns the applicants;










—


pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, declare the following provisions of the SRM Regulation, the Implementing Regulation and the Delegated Regulation inapplicable:






—


Articles 69(1), 69(2), 70(1) and 70(2)(a) and (b) of the SRM Regulation;










—


Article 4(2) and Articles 6 and 7 of the Delegated Regulation, and Annex I thereto;










—


Article 4 of the Implementing Regulation;














—


order the defendant to pay all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on eight pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-383/21, Banque postale v SRB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 279/01
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building materials, economic concentration, holding company, merger control, special chemicals








C_2021279EN.01000101.xml










13.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 279/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10302 — Standard Industries/Grace)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 279/01)
On 7 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10302. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10318 — Apollo Management/Verizon Media Group) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 360/03
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Internet, data processing, economic concentration, holding company, investment company, means of communication, merger control








C_2021360EN.01000301.xml










8.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 360/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10318 — Apollo Management/Verizon Media Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 360/03)
On 7 July 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-464/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (YOUR DAILY PROTEIN) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU figurative mark YOUR DAILY PROTEIN — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bakery, confectionery, egg, egg product, food supplement, non-alcoholic beverage, protein products, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021329EN.01002802.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/28






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Eggy Food v EUIPO (YOUR DAILY PROTEIN)
(Case T-464/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark YOUR DAILY PROTEIN - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 329/37)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Eggy Food GmbH & Co. KG (Osnabrück, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 May 2020 (R 2235/2019-5), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign YOUR DAILY PROTEIN as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Eggy Food GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 297, 7.9.2020.
Case T-680/19: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Irish Wind Farmers’ Association and Others v Commission (State aid — Energy sector — Irish legislation on business property taxation — Method for calculating the amount of the tax owed by fossil fuel electricity producers — Complaint from wind farm operators — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Procedural rights of the interested parties)
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Ireland, State aid, control of State aid, electrical energy, energy production, fossil fuel, power plant, property tax, tax relief, wind energy








C_2021338EN.01001901.xml










23.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/19






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Irish Wind Farmers’ Association and Others v Commission
(Case T-680/19) (1)

(State aid - Energy sector - Irish legislation on business property taxation - Method for calculating the amount of the tax owed by fossil fuel electricity producers - Complaint from wind farm operators - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Serious difficulties - Procedural rights of the interested parties)
(2021/C 338/23)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Irish Wind Farmers’ Association Clg (Kilkenny, Ireland), Carrons Windfarm Ltd (Shanagolden, Ireland), Foyle Windfarm Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Greenoge Windfarm Ltd (Bunclody, Ireland) (represented by: M. Segura Catalán and M. Clayton, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 5257 final of 9 July 2019 on State aid SA.44671 (2019/NN) — Ireland.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.
Case C-415/21 P: Appeal brought on 7 July 2021 by Comercializadora Eloro S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2021 in Case T-310/20, Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX)
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2022002EN.01001301.xml










3.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 2/13






Appeal brought on 7 July 2021 by Comercializadora Eloro S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2021 in Case T-310/20, Comercializadora Eloro v EUIPO — Zumex Group (JUMEX)
(Case C-415/21 P)
(2022/C 2/17)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Comercializadora Eloro S.A. (represented by: J.L. Gracia Albero, P. Merino Baylos and E. Cebollero González, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and Zumex Group, S.A.
By order of 10 November 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) did not allow the appeal to proceed and ordered Comercializadora Eloro, S.A. to bear its own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 6 July 2021 2021/C 269/03
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021269EN.01000301.xml










7.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

6 July 2021
(2021/C 269/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1838 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,99 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4361 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85450 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1490 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0930 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2150 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,610 




HUF


Hungarian forint


353,40 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4941 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9264 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,2514 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5633 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4640 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1942 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6703 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5920 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,67 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8278 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6545 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4855 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 151,39 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9193 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,753 




RUB


Russian rouble


86,9726 




THB


Thai baht


38,130 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0292 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,4590 




INR


Indian rupee


88,2126 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-268/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2021329EN.01002401.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/24






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Pshonka v Council
(Case T-268/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Retention of the applicant’s name on the list - Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
(2021/C 329/31)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: Artem Viktorovych Pshonka (Kramatorsk, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 10), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Artem Viktorovych Pshonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.
Case T-269/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Pshonka v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2021329EN.01002501.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/25






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Pshonka v Council
(Case T-269/20) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
(2021/C 329/32)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: M. Mleziva, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Pekař and P. Mahnič, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 10), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2020 L 71, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/373 of 5 March 2020 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/370 of 5 March 2020 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 222, 6.7.2020.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2021 on the draft Council decision amending Decision 2003/76/EC establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (09399/2021 — C9-0242/2021 — 2020/0142(APP))
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, Committee on Budgets, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: ECSC, ECSC Treaty, EU environmental policy, coal, fund (EU), protocol to an agreement, research and development, research expenditure (EU), research programme, steel








C_2022099EN.01024701.xml










1.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/247






P9_TA(2021)0340
Measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2021 on the draft Council decision amending Decision 2003/76/EC establishing the measures necessary for the implementation of the Protocol, annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (09399/2021 — C9-0242/2021 — 2020/0142(APP))
(Special legislative procedure — consent)
(2022/C 99/38)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the draft Council decision (09399/2021),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 2 of Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0242/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Budgets (A9-0229/2021),












1.


Gives its consent to the draft Council decision;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Case T-205/20: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Frommer v EUIPO — Minerva (I-cosmetics) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark I-cosmetics — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, apparatus based on the use of rays, cosmetic product, hairdressing and beauty care, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021338EN.01002001.xml










23.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 338/20






Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — Frommer v EUIPO — Minerva (I-cosmetics)
(Case T-205/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark I-cosmetics - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 338/25)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Angela Frommer (Unterschleißheim, Germany) (represented by: F. Remmertz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Minerva GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Dissmann, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 (Case R 675/2019-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Minerva and Ms Frommer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ms Angela Frommer to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);










3.


Orders Minerva GmbH to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2021 on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2003/77/EC laying down multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the ECSC in liquidation and, on completion of the liquidation, the Assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (COM(2020)0321 — C9-0216/2020 — 2020/0143(NLE))
Date: 2021-07-07
Institutions: Committee on Budgetary Control, Committee on Budgets, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, European Parliament
Subjects: ECSC, economic consequence, financial management, fund (EU), protocol to an agreement, research, research expenditure (EU), research programme, validation of expenditure








C_2022099EN.01024801.xml










1.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/248






P9_TA(2021)0341
Managing the assets of the ECSC in liquidation and of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 July 2021 on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2003/77/EC laying down multiannual financial guidelines for managing the assets of the ECSC in liquidation and, on completion of the liquidation, the Assets of the Research Fund for Coal and Steel (COM(2020)0321 — C9-0216/2020 — 2020/0143(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2022/C 99/39)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2020)0321),










—


having regard to Protocol No 37 on the financial consequences of the expiry of the ECSC Treaty and on the Research Fund for Coal and Steel, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 2 thereof, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0216/2020),










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A9-0228/2021),












1.


Approves the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.