do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-412/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare (Romania) lodged on 6 July 2021 — Dual Prod SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca — Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, alcohol, beverage industry, criminal procedure, excise duty, right to justice, rights of the defence, trade licence








C_2021401EN.01000501.xml










4.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Satu Mare (Romania) lodged on 6 July 2021 — Dual Prod SRL v Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca — Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate
(Case C-412/21)
(2021/C 401/05)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Satu Mare

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dual Prod SRL

Defendant: Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca — Comisia regională pentru autorizarea operatorilor de produse supuse accizelor armonizate

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 48(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which concerns the principle of the presumption of innocence, read in conjunction with Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/118/EC, (1) to be interpreted as precluding a legal situation, such as that at issue in the present case, in which an administrative measure suspending an authorisation to operate as a producer of alcohol may be adopted on the basis of mere presumptions which are the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation, without any final conviction in criminal proceedings having been handed down?










2.


Is Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which concerns the principle non bis in idem, read in conjunction with Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/118/EC, to be interpreted as precluding a legal situation, such as that at issue in the present case, in which two penalties of the same nature (suspension of authorisation to operate as a producer of alcohol), differing only in the duration of their effect, are imposed on the same person in respect of the same facts?






(1)  Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC (OJ 2009 L 9, p. 12).
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11441/2020 — C9-0027/2021 — 2020/0258(NLE))
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: Committee on Transport and Tourism, European Parliament
Subjects: agreement (EU), bus, carriage of passengers, international transport, protocol to an agreement, ratification of an agreement








C_2022099EN.01024001.xml










1.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/240






P9_TA(2021)0323
Interbus agreement: Protocol on international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of a Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11441/2020 — C9-0027/2021 — 2020/0258(NLE))
(Consent)
(2022/C 99/32)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (11441/2020),










—


having regard to the draft Protocol to the Agreement on the international occasional carriage of passengers by coach and bus (Interbus Agreement) regarding the international regular and special regular carriage of passengers by coach and bus (11442/2020),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 91 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0027/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4), and Rule 114(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A9-0176/2021),












1.


Gives its consent to the conclusion of the Protocol;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Special report No 16/2021 Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing 2021/C 266/04
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: adaptation to climate change, agricultural expenditure, common agricultural policy, fertiliser, livestock farming, peat, polluter pays principle, pollution from agricultural sources, reduction of gas emissions, rural development








C_2021266EN.01000401.xml










6.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 266/4






Special report No 16/2021
Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing
(2021/C 266/04)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 16/2021 ‘Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 5 July 2021 2021/C 266/03
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021266EN.01000301.xml










6.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 266/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

5 July 2021
(2021/C 266/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1866 




JPY


Japanese yen


131,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4360 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85665 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1435 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0935 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1778 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,586 




HUF


Hungarian forint


351,53 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5059 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9261 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,2889 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5760 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4669 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2182 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6901 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5960 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,22 




ZAR


South African rand


16,8813 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6677 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4885 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 176,31 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9315 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,491 




RUB


Russian rouble


87,0600 




THB


Thai baht


38,114 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,0069 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,5266 




INR


Indian rupee


88,1605 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (09827/2021 — C9-0243/2021 — 2020/0112(APP))
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, European Parliament
Subjects: EU competence, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, fundamental rights, operation of the Institutions








C_2022099EN.01023901.xml










1.3.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/239






P9_TA(2021)0322
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 July 2021 on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (09827/2021 — C9-0243/2021 — 2020/0112(APP))
(Special legislative procedure — consent)
(2022/C 99/31)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council regulation (09827/2021),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C9-0243/2021),










—


having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2021 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 168/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (1),










—


having regard to Rule 105(1) and (4) and Rule 52(1) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A9-0227/2021),












1.


Gives its consent to the draft Council regulation;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  Texts adopted, P9_TA(2021)0258.
Case T-394/21: Action brought on 6 July 2021 — Bayerische Landesbank v SRB
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, admissibility, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), official language








C_2021349EN.01004501.xml










30.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/45






Action brought on 6 July 2021 — Bayerische Landesbank v SRB
(Case T-394/21)
(2021/C 349/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bayerische Landesbank (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2021/22), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.




In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the defendant and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on 10 pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-389/21, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.
Case T-395/21: Action brought on 6 July 2021 — DZ Hyp v SRB
Date: 2021-07-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, admissibility, aid to undertakings, bank, bank resolution, company in difficulties, financing method, financing plan, fund (EU), official language








C_2021349EN.01004601.xml










30.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/46






Action brought on 6 July 2021 — DZ Hyp v SRB
(Case T-395/21)
(2021/C 349/61)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: DZ Hyp AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Berger and M. Weber, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board of 14 April 2021 on the calculation of the 2021 ex ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/2021/22), including the annexes thereto, in so far as the contested decision, including Annex I, Annex II and Annex III thereto, concerns the applicant’s contribution;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.




In the alternative, in the event that the Court takes the view that the contested decision is legally non-existent as a result of the use of the incorrect official language by the defendant and the action for annulment would therefore be inadmissible on the ground that it would be devoid of purpose, the applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the contested decision is legally non-existent in so far as it concerns the applicant;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on 10 pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-389/21, Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v SRB.