do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-342/21: Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Bambu Sales v EUIPO (BAMBU)
Date: 2021-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, smoking, trade-mark law








C_2021329EN.01003301.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/33






Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Bambu Sales v EUIPO (BAMBU)
(Case T-342/21)
(2021/C 329/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Bambu Sales, Inc. (Secaucus, New Jersey, United States) (represented by: T. Stein, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark BAMBU — Application for registration No 18 105 815

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2021 in Case R 1702/2020-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-340/21: Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Ryanair v Commission
Date: 2021-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, company in difficulties, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2021329EN.01003201.xml










16.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/32






Action brought on 19 June 2021 — Ryanair v Commission
(Case T-340/21)
(2021/C 329/42)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the defendant’s decision of 23 December 2020 on State aid SA.59462 (2020/N) — Greece — COVID-19: Damage compensation for Aegean Airlines (1); and










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the defendant misapplied Article 107(2)(b) TFEU and committed a manifest error of assessment in its review of the proportionality of the aid to the damage caused by the COVID-19 crisis.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision violates specific provisions of the TFEU, the general principles of European law that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s (i.e., non-discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment) and Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 (2).










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the defendant violated its duty to state reasons.






(1)  OJ 2021 C 122, p. 15 and 16.

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (Recast) (Text with EEA relevance) (OJ 2008 L 293, p. 3–20).