do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-316/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Lucaccioni v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Common rules on the insurance of officials against the risk of accident and of occupational disease — Occupational disease — Article 9 — Claim for medical expenses — Article 23 — Consulting another doctor — Refusal to bring the matter before the medical committee pursuant to Article 22 — Failure to apply, by analogy, Article 22(1), second subparagraph — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Application of the law ratione temporis)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, health expenditure, health insurance, medical report, occupational disease, staff regulations (EU)








C_2021310EN.01002001.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/20






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Lucaccioni v Commission
(Case T-316/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Common rules on the insurance of officials against the risk of accident and of occupational disease - Occupational disease - Article 9 - Claim for medical expenses - Article 23 - Consulting another doctor - Refusal to bring the matter before the medical committee pursuant to Article 22 - Failure to apply, by analogy, Article 22(1), second subparagraph - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Application of the law ratione temporis)
(2021/C 310/23)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Arnaldo Lucaccioni (San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy) (represented by: E. Bonanni, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

ACTION brought under Article 270 TFUE, seeking, first, the annulment of the Commission decision of 2 August 2018 rejecting the applicant’s requests of 23 March and 8 June 2018 to bring the matter before the medical committee pursuant to Article 22 of the Common rules on the insurance of officials of the European Communities against the risk of accident and of occupational disease and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders Arnaldo Lucaccioni to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10202 — EQT/Investindustrial/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 258/02
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, medical device, medical diagnosis, medical research, merger control, test tube fertilisation








C_2021258EN.01000201.xml










2.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 258/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10202 — EQT/Investindustrial/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 258/02)
On 16 Juni 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10202. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-421/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT3) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT3 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, electronic device, electronic game, micro-computer, mobile phone, registered trade mark, retail trade, software, trade-mark law








C_2021310EN.01003001.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/30






Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT3)
(Case T-421/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT3 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)
(2021/C 310/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1609/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order







1.


The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 April 2020 (Case R 1609/2019-4) is annulled.










2.


EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.






(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Case T-126/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 — Fluorinated greenhouse gases — Allocation of quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market — Plea of illegality — Article 16 of Regulation No 517/2014 and Annexes V and VI thereto — Principle of non-discrimination — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU emission allowance, equal treatment, greenhouse gas, hydrocarbon, marketing standard, reduction of gas emissions








C_2021310EN.01001802.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/18






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji v Commission
(Case T-126/19) (1)

(Environment - Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 - Fluorinated greenhouse gases - Allocation of quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market - Plea of illegality - Article 16 of Regulation No 517/2014 and Annexes V and VI thereto - Principle of non-discrimination - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 310/21)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: A. Galos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, A. Becker, K. Herrmann and M. Jáuregui Gómez, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, A. Tamás and W. Kuzmienko, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Michoel and I. Tchórzewska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 11 December 2018 allocating the applicant a quota of 4 096 tonnes of CO2 equivalent of hydrofluorocarbons for 2019.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Krajowa Izba Gospodarcza Chłodnictwa i Klimatyzacji to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 148, 29.4.2019.
Case T-368/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS — Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, audiovisual equipment, audiovisual production, clothing, computer equipment, gaming, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2021310EN.01002501.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/25






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Smiley Miley v EUIPO — Cyrus Trademarks (MILEY CYRUS)
(Case T-368/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MILEY CYRUS - Earlier EU figurative mark CYRUS - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 310/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Smiley Miley, Inc. (Nashville, Tennessee, United States) (represented by: J.B. Devaureix, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Ruzek, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Cyrus Trademarks Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cyrus Trademarks and Smiley Miley.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 April 2020 (Case R 2520/2018-4);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.
Case T-867/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — RA v Court of Auditors (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2016 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 — Absence of staff report — Comparison of merits — Compliance with a judgment of the General Court — Adoption of a new decision not to promote — Obligation to state reasons — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, damages, promotion








C_2021310EN.01002202.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/22






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — RA v Court of Auditors
(Case T-867/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2016 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 11 - Absence of staff report - Comparison of merits - Compliance with a judgment of the General Court - Adoption of a new decision not to promote - Obligation to state reasons - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment)
(2021/C 310/27)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: RA (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Court of Auditors (represented by: C. Lesauvage and A.-M. Feipel Cosciug, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 27 February 2019 by which the Court of Auditors decided not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 11 and, second, compensation for the damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders RA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Case T-678/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Health Product Group v EUIPO — Bioline Pharmaceutical (Enterosgel) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Enterosgel — No bad faith — Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, gastrointestinal disease, medicinal product, organic chemical, registered trade mark, semi-metal, trade-mark law








C_2021310EN.01002201.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/22






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Health Product Group v EUIPO — Bioline Pharmaceutical (Enterosgel)
(Case T-678/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Enterosgel - No bad faith - Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2021/C 310/26)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Health Product Group sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Kondrat, M. Stępień and A. Przytuła, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Bioline Pharmaceutical AG (Baar, Switzerland) (represented by: T. Grucelski, H. Gajek and M. Furmańska, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2019 (Case R 482/2018-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Health Product Group and Bioline Pharmaceutical.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Health Product Group sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 399, 25.11.2019.
Case T-558/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT10) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GT10 — Earlier EU figurative mark GT — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Relevant public — Level of attention — Action manifestly well founded)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clock and watch industry, electronic device, electronic game, mobile phone, registered trade mark, retail trade, software, telecommunications equipment, trade-mark law








C_2021310EN.01003301.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/33






Order of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Huawei Technologies (GT10)
(Case T-558/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GT10 - Earlier EU figurative mark GT - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Relevant public - Level of attention - Action manifestly well founded)
(2021/C 310/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and M. Maier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 July 2020 (Case R 2554/2019 4), relating to opposition proceedings between Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe and Huawei Technologies.

Operative part of the order







1.


The decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 8 July 2020 (Case R 2554/2019-4) is annulled.










2.


EUIPO shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd.






(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10153 – Orange/Telekom Romania Communications) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 231/04
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Romania, economic concentration, merger control, telecommunications, television








C_2021231EN.01000501.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/5






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10153 – Orange/Telekom Romania Communications)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 231/04)

1.   
On 8 June 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Orange S.A. (‘Orange’, France),










—


Telekom Romania Communications S.A. (‘TKR’, Romania), controlled by Deutsche Telekom AG (‘DT’, Germany).




Orange acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of TKR.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Orange: global telecommunications operator, active in Romania through its subsidiaries Orange Romania S.A. and Orange Business Romania S.A., which primarily offers mobile telecommunications services relying on its own mobile network, and to a very limited extent, fixed telephony, fixed internet and TV services relying almost exclusively on third-party infrastructure,










—


for TKR: provider of fixed telecommunications services, TV services and multiple-play bundles to residential and non-residential customers, wholesale services to other telecommunications operators, and to a very limited degree, mobile telecommunications services as a Mobile Virtual Network Operator relying on an agreement with Telekom Romania Mobile Communications, all in Romania.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10153 – Orange/Telekom Romania Communications
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-355/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions (Civil service — Temporary staff — Article 2(c) of the CEOS — Contract of indefinite duration — Early termination with notice — Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS — Breakdown in the relationship of trust — Terms of notice — Abuse of process — Right to be heard — Principle of sound administration — Rights of the defence — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, dismissal, full-time employment, rights of the defence, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2021310EN.01002002.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/20






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — CE v Committee of the Regions
(Case T-355/19) (1)

(Civil service - Temporary staff - Article 2(c) of the CEOS - Contract of indefinite duration - Early termination with notice - Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS - Breakdown in the relationship of trust - Terms of notice - Abuse of process - Right to be heard - Principle of sound administration - Rights of the defence - Manifest error of assessment)
(2021/C 310/24)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions (represented by: S. Bachotet and M. Esparrago Arzadun, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of 16 April 2019 by which the Committee of the Regions terminated the applicant’s employment contract and, in the alternative, annulment of the letter of 16 May 2019 by which it extended the date until which the applicant could recover her personal effects and access her e-mail during the period of notice and, second, compensation for the loss of the applicant’s personal effects and access to her e-mail, and, second, for compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Committee of the Regions of 16 April 2019 terminating CE’s employment contract as regards the specific arrangements for giving notice;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 255, 29.7.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10256 — I Squared Capital/TDR Capital/Aggreko) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 244/03
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electric machinery, energy-generating product, hiring, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2021244EN.01000301.xml










22.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 244/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10256 — I Squared Capital/TDR Capital/Aggreko)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 244/03)
On 16 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10256. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.