do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Italy and Spain v Commission (Rules on languages — Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of German-language translators, French-language translators, Italian-language translators and Dutch-language translators — Restriction of the choice of languages 2 and 3 in the competitions to German, English and French — Regulation No 1 — Article 1d(1) and (6), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations — Discrimination based on language — Interests of the service — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, information profession, linguistic discrimination, principle of proportionality, staff regulations (EU), translation, use of languages








C_2021310EN.01001801.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/18






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Italy and Spain v Commission
(Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17) (1)

(Rules on languages - Notice of open competitions for the recruitment of German-language translators, French-language translators, Italian-language translators and Dutch-language translators - Restriction of the choice of languages 2 and 3 in the competitions to German, English and French - Regulation No 1 - Article 1d(1) and (6), Article 27 and Article 28(f) of the Staff Regulations - Discrimination based on language - Interests of the service - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 310/20)
Languages of the cases: Italian and Spanish

Parties


Applicant in Case T-695/17: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant in Case T-704/17: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: L. Aguilera Ruiz, acting as Agent)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, D. Milanowska, N. Ruiz García and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the notice of open competitions to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment of German-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/343/17), French-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/344/17), Italian-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/345/17) and Dutch-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/346/17) (OJ 2017 C 224 A, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Joins Cases T-695/17 and T-704/17 for the purposes of the judgment;










2.


Annuls the notice of open competitions to draw up reserve lists for the recruitment German-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/343/17), French-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/344/17), Italian-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/345/17) and Dutch-language translators (AD 5) (EPSO/AD/346/17);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Italian Republic in Case T-695/17 and those incurred by the Kingdom of Spain in Case T-704/17.






(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 June 2021 2021/C 231/02
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021231EN.01000201.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 June 2021
(2021/C 231/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2108 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86150 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0858 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0899 




ISK


Iceland króna


147,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0823 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,450 




HUF


Hungarian forint


352,08 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5235 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9243 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,3586 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5742 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4758 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,3991 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6987 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6063 




KRW


South Korean won


1 354,10 




ZAR


South African rand


16,6800 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7502 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4883 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 254,07 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9849 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,203 




RUB


Russian rouble


87,2350 




THB


Thai baht


37,716 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1394 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,1978 




INR


Indian rupee


88,8031 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-281/19 and T-351/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Halloumi χαλλούμι Vermion grill cheese M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927 — Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Relative ground for invalidity — Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, meat, milk product, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021310EN.01001901.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/19






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion)
(Case T-281/19 and T-351/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Halloumi χαλλούμι Vermion grill cheese M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927 - Earlier national certification word marks ΧΑΛΛΟΥΜΙ HALLOUMI - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2021/C 310/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Filotas Bellas & Yios AE (Alexandreia Imathias, Greece)

Re:

Actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2019 (Case R 2298/2017-4) and 9 April 2019 (Case R 2297/2017-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Filotas Bellas & Yios.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions;










2.


Orders the Republic of Cyprus to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Case T-586/19: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — PL v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Career development report — 2017 assessment exercise — Appointment of the assessor — Article 22a of the Staff Regulations — General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials — Reasonable time — Principle of impartiality — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Obligation to state reasons — Article 26 of the Staff Regulations — Rights of the defence)
Date: 2021-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, promotion, rights of the defence, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2021310EN.01002101.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/21






Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2021 — PL v Commission
(Case T-586/19) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Career development report - 2017 assessment exercise - Appointment of the assessor - Article 22a of the Staff Regulations - General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials - Reasonable time - Principle of impartiality - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Obligation to state reasons - Article 26 of the Staff Regulations - Rights of the defence)
(2021/C 310/25)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis and J. Van Rossum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Melo Sampaio and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 12 October 2018 establishing the applicant’s career development report in respect of 2017.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders PL to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.