do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-198/20: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — MN, DN, JN, ZN v X Bank S.A. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 2(b) — Concept of ‘consumer’ — Mortgage loan drawn up in a foreign currency — Articles 3 and 4 — Assessment of the unfairness of a contractual term)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, foreign currency, mortgage bank, real estate credit, unfair terms of contract








C_2021357EN.01000401.xml










6.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/4






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie — Poland) — MN, DN, JN, ZN v X Bank S.A.
(Case C-198/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Article 2(b) - Concept of ‘consumer’ - Mortgage loan drawn up in a foreign currency - Articles 3 and 4 - Assessment of the unfairness of a contractual term)
(2021/C 357/04)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy-Woli w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: MN, DN, JN, ZN

Defendant: X Bank S.A.

Intervener: Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich

Re:

All consumers enjoy the protection laid down by Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts, not only those who may be regarded as an ‘average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect’.


(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.
Commission Decision (Euratom) 2021/1802 of 10 June 2021 pursuant to Article 83 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community – A summary of the key provisions of the Decision are set out below, without prejudice to the full effect of the Decision itself (notified under document number C(2021) 3889)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Energy, European Commission
Subjects: EAEC, Portugal, accounting system, exchange of information, infringement of EU law, nuclear research, nuclear safety, radioactive materials, report, research body




L_2021362EN.01000101.xml










12.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 362/1








            COMMISSION DECISION (Euratom) 2021/1802
of 10 June 2021
         
pursuant to Article 83 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community – A summary of the key provisions of the Decision are set out below, without prejudice to the full effect of the Decision itself


(notified under document number C(2021) 3889)







This Decision is addressed to the National Nuclear Research Centre (Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear – CTN, Portugal) and was notified to CTN on 10 June 2021.



Article 1

1.   National Nuclear Research Centre (Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear – CTN) has infringed the provisions contained in Article 78, first paragraph of the Euratom Treaty and in Article 3 and 4 of Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 302/2005 of 8 February 2005 on the application of Euratom safeguards (1) by not timely communicating to the Commission the correct and complete declaration of basic technical characteristics.


2.   National Nuclear Research Centre (Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear – CTN) has infringed the provisions contained in Article 79 of the Euratom Treaty and in Articles 7, 8 and 9 of Regulation (Euratom) No 302/2005 on the application of Euratom safeguards by the failure to set up and maintain a reliable accountancy system capable of reporting complete inventory of the nuclear materials.



Article 2

1.   The Commission issues a warning to National Nuclear Research Centre (Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear – CTN).


2.   The warning is imposed with the understanding that the shortcomings listed in Article 1 be rectified as soon as possible.


3.   Based on the report referred to in Article 3 and its own verifications, the Commission will assess CTN’s compliance with the requirements set out in paragraph 2.



Article 3
CTN shall provide the Commission, within 3 months of the date of this Decision, with a report describing the measures taken to rectify the failures listed in Article 1. CTN shall take measures to rule out similar occurrences in the future.


Article 4

1.   This Decision is addressed to the National Nuclear Research Centre (Instituto Superior Técnico, Campus Tecnológico e Nuclear – CTN, Portugal).


2.   This Decision shall be communicated to the Portuguese Republic.





Done at Brussels, 10 June 2021.


                
            





(1)  
            OJ L 5, 28.2.2005, p. 1.
Case C-279/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v WR (Reference for a preliminary ruling — General arrangements for excise duty — Directive 2008/118/EC — Article 33(3) — Goods ‘released for consumption’ in one Member State and held for commercial purposes in another Member State — Person liable to pay the excise duty that has become chargeable in respect of those goods — Person holding the goods intended for delivery in another Member State — Transporter of the goods)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, consumer goods, excise duty, taxpayer








C_2021297EN.01000601.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/6






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v WR
(Case C-279/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - General arrangements for excise duty - Directive 2008/118/EC - Article 33(3) - Goods ‘released for consumption’ in one Member State and held for commercial purposes in another Member State - Person liable to pay the excise duty that has become chargeable in respect of those goods - Person holding the goods intended for delivery in another Member State - Transporter of the goods)
(2021/C 297/03)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant: WR

Operative part of the judgment

Article 33(3) of Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that a person who transports, on behalf of others, excise goods to another Member State, and who is in physical possession of those goods at the moment when they have become chargeable to the corresponding excise duty, is liable for that excise duty, under that provision, even if that person has no right to or interest in those goods and is not aware that they are subject to excise duty or, if so aware, is not aware that they have become chargeable to the corresponding excise duty.


(1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10281 — Astorg/Cobepa/Corsearch) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 234/01
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: brand name, economic concentration, investment company, launching of a product, merger control, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021234EN.01000101.xml










17.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 234/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10281 — Astorg/Cobepa/Corsearch)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 234/01)
On 10 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10281. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-329/21: Action brought on 10 June 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — V. Fraas (FRAAS)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021297EN.01005302.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/53






Action brought on 10 June 2021 — Puma v EUIPO — V. Fraas (FRAAS)
(Case T-329/21)
(2021/C 297/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: V. Fraas GmbH (Helmbrechts/Wüstenselbitz, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘FRAAS’ — EU trade mark No 5 769 351

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2021 in Case R 2714/2019-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and order that the contested mark also be cancelled for the following goods:




Class 18: Handbags;
Class 25: Clothing, headgear, scarves, headscarves and shawls, except goods of fur and imitation fur; gloves, caps, textile accessories for clothing and headgear (included in Class 25);






—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 (Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 14 June 2018)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: agricultural product, agricultural production, consumer protection, food inspection, genetically modified organism, harmonisation of standards, labelling, organic farming, organic product








L_2021204EN.01004701.xml










10.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 204/47







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 14 June 2018
)








1.


On page 47, the title of Article 41:




for:


                  ‘Additional rules on actions in case of non-compliance’,

read:


                  ‘Additional rules on actions in the event of suspected and established non-compliance, and common catalogue of measures’.







2.


On page 47, the title of Article 42:




for:


                  ‘Additional rules on measures in the event of non-compliance’,

read:


                  ‘Additional rules on measures in the event of non-compliance affecting integrity’.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 9 June 2021 2021/C 221/04
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021221EN.01002501.xml










10.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 221/25






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 June 2021
(2021/C 221/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2195 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,38 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86053 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0595 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0913 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0518 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,377 




HUF


Hungarian forint


347,19 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4560 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9248 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,4651 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5731 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4729 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4615 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6925 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6133 




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,90 




ZAR


South African rand


16,5303 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7879 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5025 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 375,74 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0213 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,241 




RUB


Russian rouble


87,9491 




THB


Thai baht


38,000 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1345 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,9390 




INR


Indian rupee


88,9600 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-104/20: Order of the President of the Court of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles — Belgium) — SD v Habitations sociales du Roman Païs SCRL, TE, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Régie des Quartiers de Tubize ASBL
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, employer, labour standard, legal working time, rest period, staff








C_2021357EN.01001502.xml










6.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/15






Order of the President of the Court of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Nivelles — Belgium) — SD v Habitations sociales du Roman Païs SCRL, TE, acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Régie des Quartiers de Tubize ASBL
(Case C-104/20) (1)

(2021/C 357/20)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Case C-591/19 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021 — European Commission v Fernando De Esteban Alonso (Appeal — Civil service — Internal investigation by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) — Forwarding of information by OLAF to the national judicial authorities — Filing of a complaint by the European Commission — Concepts of an official who is ‘referred to by name’ and ‘implicated’ — Failure to inform the interested party — Commission’s right to file a complaint with the national judicial authorities before the conclusion of OLAF’s investigation — Action for damages)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, European official, Eurostat, charge, disclosure of information








C_2021297EN.01000701.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/7






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021 — European Commission v Fernando De Esteban Alonso
(Case C-591/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Internal investigation by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) - Forwarding of information by OLAF to the national judicial authorities - Filing of a complaint by the European Commission - Concepts of an official who is ‘referred to by name’ and ‘implicated’ - Failure to inform the interested party - Commission’s right to file a complaint with the national judicial authorities before the conclusion of OLAF’s investigation - Action for damages)
(2021/C 297/04)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Fernando De Esteban Alonso (represented by: C. Huglo, avocat)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 11 June 2019, De Esteban Alonso v Commission (T-138/18, EU:T:2019:398);










2.


Dismisses the action in Case T-138/18;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to both the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.






(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.
Case C-901/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — CF, DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2011/95/EU — Conditions for granting subsidiary protection — Article 15(c) — Concept of ‘serious and individual threat’ to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict — National legislation requiring a minimum number of civilian casualties (killed and injured) in the relevant region)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, civilian victim, public safety, right of asylum, war








C_2021297EN.01000901.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/9






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — CF, DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
(Case C-901/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection - Directive 2011/95/EU - Conditions for granting subsidiary protection - Article 15(c) - Concept of ‘serious and individual threat’ to a civilian’s life or person by reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict - National legislation requiring a minimum number of civilian casualties (killed and injured) in the relevant region)
(2021/C 297/07)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: CF, DN

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 15(c) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted, must be interpreted as precluding the interpretation of national legislation according to which, where a civilian is not specifically targeted by reason of factors particular to his or her personal circumstances, a finding of serious and individual threat to that civilian’s life or person by reason of ‘indiscriminate violence in situations of … armed conflict’, within the meaning of that provision, is subject to the condition that the ratio between the number of casualties in the relevant area and the total number of individuals composing the population of that area reach a fixed threshold.










2.


Article 15(c) of Directive 2011/95 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to determine whether there is a ‘serious and individual threat’, within the meaning of that provision, a comprehensive appraisal of all the circumstances of the individual case, in particular those which characterise the situation of the applicant’s country of origin, is required.






(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.
Case C-65/20: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — VI v KRONE — Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Liability for defective products — Directive 85/374/EEC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘defective product’ — Copy of a printed newspaper containing inaccurate health advice — Exclusion from the directive’s scope)
Date: 2021-06-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, defective product, newspaper, paramedical training, producer's liability, trauma








C_2021297EN.01001201.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/12






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — VI v KRONE — Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG
(Case C-65/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Liability for defective products - Directive 85/374/EEC - Article 2 - Concept of ‘defective product’ - Copy of a printed newspaper containing inaccurate health advice - Exclusion from the directive’s scope)
(2021/C 297/10)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: VI

Defendant: KRONE — Verlag Gesellschaft mbH & Co KG

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2 of Council Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products, as amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 1999, read in the light of Articles 1 and 6 thereof, as amended by Directive 1999/34, must be interpreted as meaning that a copy of a printed newspaper that, concerning paramedical matters, gives inaccurate health advice relating to the use of a plant which, when followed, has proved injurious to the health of a reader of that newspaper, does not constitute a ‘defective product’ within the meaning of those provisions.


(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.