do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-132/18: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Roland v Commission (Dumping — Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 — Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty — Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid — Market economy treatment (MET) — Individual treatment (IT) — Desk analysis — Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information — Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties — Legal basis — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Non-retroactivity — Proportionality — Non-discrimination — Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Previous decision-making practice — Competence of national authorities and courts)
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Viet Nam, anti-dumping duty, equal treatment, footwear industry, import (EU), leather, originating product, principle of legal certainty, retroactivity of a law








C_2021297EN.01003001.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/30






Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Roland v Commission
(Case T-132/18) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Implementation of the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 - Reimposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty and definitive collection of the provisional duty - Resumption of the proceeding which preceded the regulations declared invalid - Market economy treatment (MET) - Individual treatment (IT) - Desk analysis - Absence of a verification visit or a request for additional information - Non-reimbursement of anti-dumping duties - Legal basis - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Non-retroactivity - Proportionality - Non-discrimination - Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Previous decision-making practice - Competence of national authorities and courts)
(2021/C 297/35)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Roland SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. De Knop, A. Willems and B. Natens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2232 of 4 December 2017 reimposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and produced by certain exporting producers in the People’s Republic of China and Vietnam and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14 (OJ 2017 L 319, p. 30).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Roland SE to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 152, 30.4.2018.
Case C-360/21 P: Appeal brought on 9 June 2021 by FCA Italy SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2021 in Case T-191/20, FCA Italy v EUIPO
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, pneumatic tyre, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_2022037EN.01000501.xml










24.1.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 37/5






Appeal brought on 9 June 2021 by FCA Italy SpA against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 28 April 2021 in Case T-191/20, FCA Italy v EUIPO
(Case C-360/21 P)
(2022/C 37/05)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: FCA Italy SpA (represented by: F. Jacobacci, E. Truffo, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 9 June 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that FCA Italy SpA should bear its own costs.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 June 2021 2021/C 219/06
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021219EN.01000601.xml










9.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 June 2021
(2021/C 219/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2182 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4364 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86100 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0755 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0914 




ISK


Iceland króna


146,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0480 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,394 




HUF


Hungarian forint


347,86 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4698 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9238 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,4666 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5718 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4706 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4526 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6885 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6120 




KRW


South Korean won


1 358,73 




ZAR


South African rand


16,4593 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7938 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4975 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 358,22 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0196 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,097 




RUB


Russian rouble


88,2824 




THB


Thai baht


37,996 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1300 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,0699 




INR


Indian rupee


88,7780 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-302/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2021297EN.01003301.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/33






Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council
(Case T-302/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
(2021/C 297/39)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych (Saint-Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: M. Anderson, R. Kiddell, Solicitors, E. Dean and J. Marjason-Stamp, Barristers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Mahnič, A. Vitro and T. Haas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 7), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.
Case T-453/20: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — KZ v Commission (Civil service — Officials — 2019 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote — General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Plea of illegality — Leave on personal grounds — Ineligibility for promotion)
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, promotion, staff regulations (EU), unpaid leave








C_2021297EN.01004201.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/42






Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — KZ v Commission
(Case T-453/20) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote - General provisions for implementing Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Plea of illegality - Leave on personal grounds - Ineligibility for promotion)
(2021/C 297/52)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: KZ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Commission, published in Administrative Notices No 32-2019 of 14 November 2019, not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials promoted in the 2019 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders KZ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Case T-303/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2021297EN.01003401.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/34






Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Yanukovych v Council
(Case T-303/19) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine - Freezing of funds - List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection)
(2021/C 297/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) (represented by: M. Anderson, R. Kiddell, Solicitors, E. Dean and J. Marjason-Stamp, Barristers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Mahnič, A. Vitro and T. Haas, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 7), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2019 L 64, p. 1), in so far as those acts maintain the applicant’s name on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine, in so far as the name of Mr Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych was maintained on the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to those restrictive measures;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 238, 15.7.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10270 — SMO PSA/CDC/Swissterminal/Euro Rhein Ports JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 231/01
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, economic concentration, harbour installation, logistics, merger control, port administration, services of general interest








C_2021231EN.01000101.xml










16.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 231/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10270 — SMO PSA/CDC/Swissterminal/Euro Rhein Ports JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 231/01)
On 9 June 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10270. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down conservation and management measures applicable in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Area and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 520/2007 (COM(2021) 198 final — 2021/0103 (COD))
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: Pacific Ocean, UN convention, conservation of fish stocks, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing rights, fishing vessel, sea fish, sea fishing, ship's flag








C_2021341EN.01010801.xml










24.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/108






Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down conservation and management measures applicable in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Area and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 520/2007
(COM(2021) 198 final — 2021/0103 (COD))
(2021/C 341/17)






Referral


European Parliament, 26.04.2021
Council, 06.05.2021




Legal basis


Articles 43(2) and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union




Section responsible


Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment




Adopted at plenary


09.06.2021




Plenary session No


561




Outcome of vote
(for/against/abstentions)


221/0/7




Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 561st plenary session of 9 and 10 June 2021 (meeting of 9 June), by 221 votes in favour with 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 9 June 2021.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG
Special report No 8/2021 Frontex’s support to external border management: not sufficiently effective to date 2021/C 219/08
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU migration policy, European security, Frontex, border control, crime, external border of the EU, fight against crime, illegal migration, operation of the Institutions








C_2021219EN.01000801.xml










9.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/8






Special report No 8/2021
Frontex’s support to external border management:
not sufficiently effective to date
(2021/C 219/08)
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that special report No 8/2021 ‘Frontex’s support to external border management: not sufficiently effective to date’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) Area of Competence, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1936/2001, (EC) No 1984/2003 and (EC) No 520/2007’ (COM(2021) 113 final — 2021/0058 (COD))
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: Indian Ocean, conservation of fish stocks, fishing agreement, fishing area, fishing controls, fishing rights, multilateral agreement, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2021341EN.01010601.xml










24.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/106






Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down management, conservation and control measures applicable in the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) Area of Competence, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1936/2001, (EC) No 1984/2003 and (EC) No 520/2007’
(COM(2021) 113 final — 2021/0058 (COD))
(2021/C 341/15)






Referral


European Parliament, 24.3.2021
Council, 31.3.2021




Legal basis


Article 43, paragraph 2 and article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union




Section responsible


Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment




Adopted at plenary


9.6.2021




Plenary session No


561




Outcome of vote
(for/against/abstentions)


187/0/2




Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 561st plenary session of 9 and 10 June 2021 (meeting of 9 June), by 187 votes in favour with 2 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 9 June 2021.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG
Case T-47/19: Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Dansk Erhverv v Commission (State aid — Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents — Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany — Complaint — Decision by the Commission not to raise objections — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure — Error of law — Serious difficulties — Concept of ‘State aid’ — State resources — Non-imposition of a fine)
Date: 2021-06-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, beverage, control of State aid, deposit on a polluting product, packaging product, sale








C_2021297EN.01003101.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/31






Judgment of the General Court of 9 June 2021 — Dansk Erhverv v Commission
(Case T-47/19) (1)

(State aid - Sale of canned beverages in border shops in Germany to foreign residents - Exemption from the deposit on condition that the beverages purchased are consumed outside Germany - Complaint - Decision by the Commission not to raise objections - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Conditions for initiating a formal investigation procedure - Error of law - Serious difficulties - Concept of ‘State aid’ - State resources - Non-imposition of a fine)
(2021/C 297/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dansk Erhverv (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: T. Mygind and H. Peytz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Danmarks Naturfredningsforening (Copenhagen) (represented by: T. Mygind and H. Peytz, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller, R. Kanitz, S. Heimerl and S. Costanzo, acting as Agents), Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) (Flensburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Bauer and F. von Hammerstein, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 6315 final of 4 October 2018 concerning State Aid SA.44865 (2016/FC) — Germany — Alleged State aid to German beverage border shops.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2018) 6315 final of 4 October 2018 concerning State aid SA.44865 (2016/FC) — Germany — Alleged State aid to German beverage border shops;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dansk Erhverv and Danmarks Naturfredningsforening;










3.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and Interessengemeinschaft der Grenzhändler (IGG) to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 103, 18.3.2019.