do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-280/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ZN v Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Determination of international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State — Article 5(1) — Employee residing in a Member State — Contract concluded with a consular representation of that Member State in another Member State — Functions of the employee — No exercise of public powers)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, EU national, consulate, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, labour dispute, residence








C_2021289EN.01001601.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/16






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski Rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — ZN v Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania
(Case C-280/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 - Determination of international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State - Article 5(1) - Employee residing in a Member State - Contract concluded with a consular representation of that Member State in another Member State - Functions of the employee - No exercise of public powers)
(2021/C 289/22)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Sofiyski Rayonen sad

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: ZN

Defendant: Generalno konsulstvo na Republika Bulgaria v grad Valensia, Kralstvo Ispania

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read in conjunction with recital 3 of that regulation, must be interpreted as meaning that it applies for the purposes of determining the international jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to hear and rule on a dispute between an employee from a Member State who does not carry out duties involving the exercise of public powers and a consular authority of that Member State situated in the territory of another Member State.


(1)  OJ C 287, 31.8.2020.
Case C-186/21 PPU: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — J.A. v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Immigration and asylum policy — International protection — Directive 2013/33/EU — Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) — Detention of applicants for international protection — Applicant detained subject to a return procedure under Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he is making the application for international protection merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of the return decision — Objective criteria on which such grounds may be based — Applicant who has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, asylum seeker, foreign national, return migration, right of asylum








C_2021357EN.01000502.xml










6.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/5






Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije — Slovenia) — J.A. v Republika Slovenija
(Case C-186/21 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Immigration and asylum policy - International protection - Directive 2013/33/EU - Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) - Detention of applicants for international protection - Applicant detained subject to a return procedure under Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he is making the application for international protection merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of the return decision - Objective criteria on which such grounds may be based - Applicant who has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure)
(2021/C 357/07)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J.A.

Defendant: Republika Slovenija

Operative part of the order

Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 8(3) of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that an applicant for international protection has already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure constitutes an objective criterion for the purposes of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 206, 31.5.2021.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/985 of 3 June 2021 correcting the Spanish language version of Decision 2004/842/EC concerning implementing rules whereby Member States may authorise the placing on the market of seed belonging to varieties for which an application for entry in the national catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species or vegetable species has been submitted (notified under document C(2021) 3869) (Text with EEA relevance)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: crop production, marketing standard, seed








L_2021216EN.01020401.xml










18.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 216/204








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/985
of 3 June 2021
         
correcting the Spanish language version of Decision 2004/842/EC concerning implementing rules whereby Member States may authorise the placing on the market of seed belonging to varieties for which an application for entry in the national catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species or vegetable species has been submitted


(notified under document C(2021) 3869)


(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Directive 2002/55/EC of 13 June 2002 on the marketing of vegetable seed (1), and in particular Article 23(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Spanish language version of Commission Decision 2004/842/EC (2) contains an error in Article 31(1) as regards the renewal of authorisations concerning vegetable species.












(2)


The Spanish language version of Decision 2004/842/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

(does not concern the English language)



Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.




Done at Brussels, 3 June 2021.


For the Commission

Johannes HAHN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 33.

(2)  Commission Decision 2004/842/EC of 1 December 2004 concerning implementing rules whereby Member States may authorise the placing on the market of seed belonging to varieties for which an application for entry in the national catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species or vegetable species has been submitted (OJ L 362, 9.12.2004, p. 21).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 210/06
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, hire purchase, merger control, motor vehicle industry, oil industry, petrochemicals, special chemicals, sport








C_2021210EN.01001301.xml










3.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 210/13






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 210/06)

1.   
On 27 May 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


INEOS Limited (‘INEOS’, Isle of Man),










—


Daimler AG (‘Daimler’, Germany),










—


Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix Limited (‘MBGP’, United Kingdom), currently controlled by Daimler and Motorsports Invest Limited (‘MIL’, Guernsey).




INEOS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of MBGP.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for INEOS: global manufacturer of petrochemicals, speciality chemicals and oil products,










—


for Daimler: manufacture and supply of cars, trucks, vans and buses as well as financial services comprising financing, leasing, insurance and fleet management,










—


for MBGP: design, development, manufacture, supply, testing and racing of Formula One motor racing cars at FIA Formula One World Championships level.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10171 — INEOS/Daimler/Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/901 of 3 June 2021 correcting the Swedish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: pest, plant disease, plant health control, protected area, protection of plant life








L_2021197EN.01007501.xml










4.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 197/75








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/901
of 3 June 2021
         
correcting the Swedish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament of the Council of 26 October 2016 on protective measures against pests of plants, amending Regulations (EU) No 228/2013, (EU) No 652/2014 and (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 69/464/EEC, 74/647/EEC, 93/85/EEC, 98/57/EC, 2000/29/EC, 2006/91/EC and 2007/33/EC (1), and in particular Article 41(2) and Article 72(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Swedish language version of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 (2) contains errors in points 65 and 68 of Annex VII as regards conditions that have to be fulfilled for introducing certain plants or plant products in the Union and in point 12 of Part A of Annex XI as regards the indication of a plant.












(2)


The Swedish language version of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

(does not concern the English language)



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 June 2021.


For the Commission


The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 317, 23.11.2016, p. 4.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 of 28 November 2019 establishing uniform conditions for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards protective measures against pests of plants, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 (OJ L 319, 10.12.2019, p. 1).
Case C-563/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 — Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA, Harz-Metall GmbH v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for car battery recycling — 2006 Leniency Notice — Point 26 — Partial immunity — Additional facts increasing the gravity or the duration of the infringement — Elements known to the European Commission — Reduction of the amount of the fine — Ranking for the purposes of the reduction — Chronological order)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competition policy, cartel, electricity storage device, electronic waste, inter-company agreement, price agreement, sanction (EU), vehicle parts, waste recycling








C_2021289EN.01000601.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/6






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 — Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA, Harz-Metall GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-563/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for car battery recycling - 2006 Leniency Notice - Point 26 - Partial immunity - Additional facts increasing the gravity or the duration of the infringement - Elements known to the European Commission - Reduction of the amount of the fine - Ranking for the purposes of the reduction - Chronological order)
(2021/C 289/07)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA, Harz-Metall GmbH (represented by: M. Wellinger, avocat, and by S. Reinart and K. Bongs, Rechtsanwältinnen)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski, I. Rogalski, and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA and Harz-Metall GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 312, 16.9.2019.
Case C-194/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — BY, CX, FU, DW, EV v Stadt Duisburg (Reference for a preliminary ruling — EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 — Articles 6 and 7 — Legal employment — Article 9 — Access to education for children of a Turkish worker — Right of residence — Refusal)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Türkiye, access to education, association agreement (EU), child, migrant worker, residence permit








C_2021289EN.01001501.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/15






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — BY, CX, FU, DW, EV v Stadt Duisburg
(Case C-194/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - EEC-Turkey Association Agreement - Decision No 1/80 - Articles 6 and 7 - Legal employment - Article 9 - Access to education for children of a Turkish worker - Right of residence - Refusal)
(2021/C 289/20)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: BY, CX, FU, DW, EV

Defendant: Stadt Duisburg

Operative part of the judgment

The first sentence of Article 9 of Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the development of the Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey must be interpreted as meaning that it cannot be relied on by Turkish children whose parents do not satisfy the conditions laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of that decision.


(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
Case C-624/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Watford Employment Tribunal — United Kingdom) — K and Others, L, M, N and Others, O, P, Q, R, S, T v Tesco Stores Ltd (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Equal pay for male and female workers — Article 157 TFEU — Direct effect — Concept of ‘work of equal value’ — Claims seeking equal pay for work of equal value — Single source — Workers of different sex having the same employer — Different establishments — Comparison)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: direct applicability, equal pay, establishment, gender equality








C_2021289EN.01000602.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/6






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Watford Employment Tribunal — United Kingdom) — K and Others, L, M, N and Others, O, P, Q, R, S, T v Tesco Stores Ltd
(Case C-624/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Equal pay for male and female workers - Article 157 TFEU - Direct effect - Concept of ‘work of equal value’ - Claims seeking equal pay for work of equal value - Single source - Workers of different sex having the same employer - Different establishments - Comparison)
(2021/C 289/08)
Language of the case: English

Referring tribunal

Watford Employment Tribunal

Parties to the main proceedings


Claimants: K and Others, L, M, N and Others, O, P, Q, R, S, T

Respondent: Tesco Stores Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

Article 157 TFEU must be interpreted as having direct effect in proceedings between individuals in which failure to observe the principle of equal pay for male and female workers for ‘work of equal value’, as referred to in that article, is pleaded.


(1)  OJ C 357, 21.10.2019.
Case C-931/19: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — Titanium Ltd v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 43 and 45 — Directive 2006/112/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/8/EC — Articles 44, 45 and 47 — Provision of services — Point of reference for tax purposes — Concept of a ‘fixed establishment’ — Letting a property in a Member State — Owner of a property with its registered office on the island of Jersey)
Date: 2021-06-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Jersey, VAT, establishment, property leasing, provision of services








C_2021289EN.01001102.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/11






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 June 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht — Austria) — Titanium Ltd v Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien
(Case C-931/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 43 and 45 - Directive 2006/112/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/8/EC - Articles 44, 45 and 47 - Provision of services - Point of reference for tax purposes - Concept of a ‘fixed establishment’ - Letting a property in a Member State - Owner of a property with its registered office on the island of Jersey)
(2021/C 289/15)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Titanium Ltd

Defendant: Finanzamt Österreich, formerly Finanzamt Wien

Operative part of the judgment

A property which is let in a Member State, in the circumstance where the owner of that property does not have his or her own staff to perform services relating to the letting does not constitute a fixed establishment within the meaning of Article 43 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax and of Articles 44 and 45 of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Council Directive 2008/8/EC of 12 February 2008.


(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.