do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-334/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Rieti (Italy) lodged on 26 May 2021 — Criminal proceedings against G.B., R.H.
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, criminal proceedings, data protection, disclosure of information, fight against crime, personal data, principle of legal certainty, protection of communications, public prosecutor's department, telecommunications








C_2021310EN.01001201.xml










2.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 310/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Rieti (Italy) lodged on 26 May 2021 — Criminal proceedings against G.B., R.H.
(Case C-334/21)
(2021/C 310/16)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Rieti

Parties to the main proceedings

G.B., R.H.

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, (1) read in the light of Articles 7, 8, 11 and 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles established by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgment of 2 March 2021 in Case C-746/18, to be interpreted as precluding national rules such as those laid down in Article 132(3) of Legislative Decree No 196/2003, which confer powers on the Public Prosecutor, which is a body whose independence and autonomy is fully guaranteed under the rules laid down in Title IV of the Italian Constitution, to require, by reasoned order, the delivery over of traffic data and location data for the purposes of criminal proceedings?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the negative, can the Court provide further interpretative guidance concerning the possible non-retroactive application of the principles established in its judgment of 2 March 2021 in Case C-746/18, having regard to the overriding requirements of legal certainty in the sphere of the prevention, detection and combating of serious crime and threats to security?










3.


Is Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in the light of Articles 7, 8, 11 and 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of the principles established by the Court in its judgment of 2 March 2021 in Case C-746/18, to be interpreted as precluding national rules such as those laid down in Article 132(3) of Legislative Decree No 196/2003, read in the light of Article 267(2) of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure, which enable the Public Prosecutor, in urgent cases, immediately to obtain telephone traffic data, with the subsequent scrutiny and supervision of the court before which the case is brought?






(1)  Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37).
Council Decision (EU) 2021/878 of 26 May 2021 appointing a member, proposed by the Federal Republic of Germany, of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Germany, appointment of members, member of the Committee of the Regions








L_2021192EN.01001301.xml










1.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 192/13








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2021/878
of 26 May 2021
         
appointing a member, proposed by the Federal Republic of Germany, of the Committee of the Regions


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (EU) 2019/852 of 21 May 2019 determining the composition of the Committee of the Regions (1),


Having regard to the proposal from the German Government,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 300(3) of the Treaty, the Committee of the Regions is to consist of representatives of regional and local bodies who either hold a regional or local authority electoral mandate or are politically accountable to an elected assembly.












(2)


On 10 December 2019, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2019/2157 (2), appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025.












(3)


A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the resignation of Mr Florian HERRMANN.












(4)


The German government has proposed Ms Melanie HUML, representative of a regional executive body who holds an electoral mandate (Staatsministerin, Bayerische Staatsregierung), as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ms Melanie HUML, representative of a regional executive body who holds an electoral mandate (Staatsministerin, Bayerische Staatsregierung) is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2025.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 26 May 2021.


For the Council


The President

M. do C. ANTUNES
            





(1)  
            OJ L 139, 27.5.2019, p. 13.

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2019/2157 of 10 December 2019 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2020 to 25 January 2025 (OJ L 327, 17.12.2019, p. 78).
Case C-328/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trieste (Italy) lodged on 26 May 2021 — GE v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l’Immigrazione — Unità Dublino
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, asylum seeker, disclosure of information, foreign national, jurisdiction, resettlement of persons, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2021297EN.01002701.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trieste (Italy) lodged on 26 May 2021 — GE v Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l’Immigrazione — Unità Dublino
(Case C-328/21)
(2021/C 297/31)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Trieste

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: GE

Respondent: Ministero dell’Interno, Dipartimento per le Libertà civili e l’Immigrazione — Unità Dublino

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (1) be interpreted:






—


as meaning that a failure to provide the information leaflet required under Article 4(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 to a person who meets the conditions described in Article 23(1) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 in itself renders the transfer decision irremediably invalid (and potentially also establishes the responsibility of the Member State to which the person has submitted the new application to take a decision on the application for international protection);










—


or as meaning that it is for the appellant to prove in court that the procedure would have had a different outcome if the leaflet had been provided to him or her?














2.


Must Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 be interpreted:






—


as meaning that a failure to provide the information leaflet required under Article 29 of Regulation (EU) No 603/2013 to a person who meets the conditions described in Article 24(1) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 in itself renders the transfer decision irremediably invalid (and potentially also results in the need to provide a possibility to submit a new application for international protection);










—


or as meaning that it is for the appellant to prove in court that the procedure would have had a different outcome if the leaflet had been provided to him or her?










(1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).
Announcement concerning the opening of winding-up proceedings for Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci [Czechoslovak Credit Cooperative in liquidation] 2021/C 197/05
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union, European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, credit union, judicial proceedings, liquidation








C_2021197EN.01000501.xml










26.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 197/5






Announcement concerning the opening of winding-up proceedings for Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci [Czechoslovak Credit Cooperative in liquidation]
(2021/C 197/05)
EXTRACT FROM THE DECISION ON OPENING WINDING-UP PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO DIRECTIVE 2001/24/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL OF 4 APRIL 2001 ON THE REORGANISATION AND WINDING UP OF CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
Invitation to lodge a claim. Time limits to be observed.
Lukáš Vlašaný, born 28 October 1974, residing at Palackého 351/6, 390 01 Tábor, as liquidator of the savings and credit union Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci, company ID No: 649 46 851, having its registered offices at Gočárova třída 312/52, Pražské Předměstí, 500 02 Hradec Králové, entered in the business register held by the Hradec Králové regional court under reference Dr 1358 (‘the Cooperative’), appointed by decision of the Hradec Králové regional court No 34 Cm 65/2021-15 of 6 April 2021, hereby announces, in accordance with Article 13 and Article 17 of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions, that the Cooperative went into liquidation on 25 March 2021, when, on the basis of a decision taken by the assembly of delegates of the Cooperation on 25 March 2021, it was decided, within the meaning of Article IX(A)(18)(k) in conjunction with Article IX(B)(1) of the articles of association and in accordance with Section 656(q) and Section 669 of Act No 90/2012 on business corporations, as amended, to wind-up the Cooperative with immediate effect.
Creditors of the Cooperative are invited to lodge their claims by the deadline of 30 July 2021. Claims should be lodged by the said deadline, in writing, with the liquidator of the Cooperative, Lukáš Vlašaný, at Vančurova 2904, 390 01 Tábor, Czech Republic.


Lukáš VLAŠANÝ

Liquidator


Československé úvěrní družstvo v likvidaci
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 26 May 2021 in the case of Norep AS v Haugen Gruppen AS (Case E-2/21) 2021/C 417/07
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Norway, contract, freedom to provide services, right of establishment, sale, sales representative, self-employed person








C_2021417EN.01002701.xml










14.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 417/27






Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Norges Høyesterett dated 26 May 2021 in the case of Norep AS v Haugen Gruppen AS
(Case E-2/21)
(2021/C 417/07)
A request has been made to the EFTA Court dated 26 May 2021 from Norges Høyesterett (Supreme Court of Norway), which was received at the Court Registry on 11 June 2021, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Norep AS v Haugen Gruppen AS on the following questions:






1.


Shall the term ‘negotiate’ in Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653 be interpreted as presupposing involvement with orders from customers to the principal, with the result that the orders may not go directly from customers to the principal, as the facts in the present case is described in Chapter 3 above?[ (1)]










2.


If question 1 is answered in the negative, which factors are relevant in the assessment of whether sales-related activity is to be deemed to be ‘negotiation’ for the purposes of Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653?






(1)  For full text of the Request for an Advisory Opinion, see https://eftacourt.int/download/2-21-request-ao/?wpdmdl=7454
Case T-92/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 May 2021 — Darment v Commission (Application for interim relief — Environment — Fluorinated greenhouse gases — Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 — Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market — Decision imposing a penalty on an undertaking that exceeded the quota allocated to it — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU Emissions Trading Scheme, EU emission allowance, access to EU information, fluorine, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions, sanction (EU), tradeable emission permit








C_2021278EN.01004801.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/48






Order of the President of the General Court of 26 May 2021 — Darment v Commission
(Case T-92/21 R)
(Application for interim relief - Environment - Fluorinated greenhouse gases - Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 - Placing of hydrofluorocarbons on the market - Decision imposing a penalty on an undertaking that exceeded the quota allocated to it - Application for interim measures - No urgency)
(2021/C 278/68)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Darment Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: C. Ginter, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 279 TFEU seeking, first, an order requiring the Commission to cease applying to the applicant, as regards the year 2021 and subsequent allocation periods, a penalty under Article 25(2) of Regulation (EU) No 517/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing Regulation (EC) No 842/2006 (OJ 2014 L 150, p. 195), and, secondly, an order requiring the Commission to allocate to the applicant a quota for the bulk import of hydrofluorocarbons for the 2021 allocation period and subsequent allocation periods.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10257 — Clearlake/TA Associates/Infogix) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 219/03
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, financial services, information analysis, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, provision of services, technology








C_2021219EN.01000301.xml










9.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10257 — Clearlake/TA Associates/Infogix)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 219/03)
On 26 May 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10257. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 25 May 2021 2021/C 197/04
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021197EN.01000401.xml










26.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 197/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 May 2021
(2021/C 197/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2264 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,49 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4360 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86573 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1338 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0977 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1965 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,447 




HUF


Hungarian forint


348,86 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4839 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9250 




TRY


Turkish lira


10,3176 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5785 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4758 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,5197 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6918 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6255 




KRW


South Korean won


1 375,57 




ZAR


South African rand


16,9591 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8560 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5120 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 575,54 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0809 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,033 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,0534 




THB


Thai baht


38,448 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4970 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3183 




INR


Indian rupee


89,2360 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-54/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 26 May 2021 — OHB System v Commission (Interim relief — Public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Procurement of Galileo transition satellites — Rejection of a tender — Application for interim measures — Prima facie case — Urgency — Balancing of competing interests)
Date: 2021-05-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, award of contract, confidentiality, public procurement, restriction on competition, satellite communications, supplies contract, tendering








C_2021278EN.01004702.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/47






Order of the President of the General Court of 26 May 2021 — OHB System v Commission
(Case T-54/21 R)
(Interim relief - Public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts - Procurement of Galileo transition satellites - Rejection of a tender - Application for interim measures - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balancing of competing interests)
(2021/C 278/67)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: OHB System AG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: W. Würfel and F. Hausmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms, J. Estrada de Solà, L. Mantl and L. André, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 278 TFEU for, first, suspension of the operation of the decisions of the European Space Agency (ESA) of 19 and 22 January 2021, acting in the name and on behalf of the Commission, to reject the applicant’s tender for public contract 2018/S 091-206089 and to award that public contract to two other tenderers, and, second, for the Commission to be ordered to provide access to the tender documentation.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim relief is dismissed.










2.


The orders of 31 January 2021, OHB System v Commission (T-54/21 R), and of 26 February 2021, OHB System v Commission (T-54/21 R), are set aside.










3.


The costs are reserved, with the exception of those incurred by Airbus Defence and Space GmbH. It shall bear the costs in relation to its application to intervene.