do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-279/21: Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Daimler v EUIPO (Representation of three-pronged elements on a black background IV)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, cosmetic product, furniture industry, leather, miscellaneous industries, registered trade mark, textile product, trade-mark law, vehicle








C_2021278EN.01006002.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/60






Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Daimler v EUIPO (Representation of three-pronged elements on a black background IV)
(Case T-279/21)
(2021/C 278/82)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: N. Siebertz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark (Representation of three-pronged elements on a black background IV) — Application for registration No 18 206 087

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 March 2021 in Case R 1898/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and those incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Corrigendum to Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy (Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 30 April 2021)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: European Atomic Energy Community, United Kingdom
Subjects: United Kingdom, agreement (EU), nuclear policy, nuclear safety, peaceful use of energy, withdrawal from the EU




L_2021178EN.01000501.xml










20.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 178/5







Corrigendum to Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the European Atomic Energy Community for Cooperation on the Safe and Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 30 April 2021
)


On page 14, Article 24(1):
for:


‘1.   This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following that in which both Parties have notified each other that they have completed their respective internal requirements and procedures for establishing their consent to be bound.’,


read:


‘1.   This Agreement shall enter into force on the first day of the month following that in which both Parties have notified each other that they have completed their respective internal requirements and procedures for establishing their consent to be bound (*1)





(*1)  The notification was completed by 30 April 2021. In accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, the date of its entry into force is 1 May 2021.’.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/814 of 20 May 2021 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 on Union outreach activities in support of the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: arms control, arms trade, conventional weapon, dual-use good, export monitoring, international agreement, international cooperation, the EU's international role




L_2021180EN.01015101.xml










21.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 180/151








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/814
of 20 May 2021
         
amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 on Union outreach activities in support of the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 29 May 2017, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 (1).












(2)


On 30 July 2020, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/1134 (2), amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 and extending the implementation period for the activities referred to in Article 1 thereof until 30 June 2021.












(3)


On 31 March 2021, the Bundesamt für Wirtschaft und Ausfuhrkontrolle, and on 6 April 2021, Expertise France, in their respective capacities as Implementing Agencies, requested the authorisation of the Union to extend for a second time the implementation of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/915, until 31 January 2022, due to continuing challenges arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.












(4)


The continuation of the activities referred to in Article 1 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 does not have any implication as regards financial resources until 31 January 2022,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 5 of Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 is hereby replaced by the following:


‘Article 5
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall expire on 31 January 2022.’.




Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 20 May 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. SANTOS SILVA
            





(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 of 29 May 2017 on Union outreach activities in support of the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty (OJ L 139, 30.5.2017, p. 38).

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1134 of 30 July 2020 amending Decision (CFSP) 2017/915 on Union outreach activities in support of the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty (OJ L 247, 31.7.2020, p. 24).
Case C-63/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 2021 — Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract with a termination clause — Not included on the reserve list for a competition — Purely confirmatory measure — Time for bringing a complaint)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: competition (EU), limitation of legal proceedings, servant (EU), temporary employment








C_2021278EN.01001801.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/18






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 2021 — Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
(Case C-63/20 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause - Not included on the reserve list for a competition - Purely confirmatory measure - Time for bringing a complaint)
(2021/C 278/24)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Sigrid Dickmanns (represented by: H. Tettenborn, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Ms Sigrid Dickmanns to pay the costs of the present proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.
Case C-115/20 P: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 20 May 2021 — Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Commission
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU competence, drug surveillance, equal treatment, health risk, medicinal product








C_2021320EN.01003302.xml










9.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 320/33






Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 20 May 2021 — Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Commission
(Case C-115/20 P) (1)

(2021/C 320/36)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
Notice of open competition 2021/C 193/04
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), food inspection, food safety, health control, health legislation, job vacancy, recruitment








C_2021193EN.01000501.xml










20.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 193/5






NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
(2021/C 193/04)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:
EPSO/AD/392/21 - ADMINISTRATORS (AD 7) IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY






1.


Policymaking and law-making in the field of health










2.


Policymaking and law-making in the field of food safety










3.


Auditing, inspection and evaluation in the field of health and food safety




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in 
Official Journal of the European Union C 193 A of 20 May 2021.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/813 of 20 May 2021 amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU police mission, Ukraine, public safety




L_2021180EN.01014901.xml










21.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 180/149








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/813
of 20 May 2021
         
amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 July 2014 the Council adopted Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (1).












(2)


On 13 May 2019 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2019/761 (2), extending the mandate of EUAM Ukraine until 31 May 2021.












(3)


In the context of a strategic review of EUAM Ukraine, the Political and Security Committee agreed that EUAM Ukraine should be extended until 31 May 2024 and that a strategic assessment should be conducted after two years, focused on the evolution in the political dimension.












(4)


Decision 2014/486/CFSP should therefore be extended until 31 May 2024.












(5)


EUAM Ukraine will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision 2014/486/CFSP is amended as follows:






(1)


in Article 14(1), the following subparagraph is added:

                              ‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUAM Ukraine for the period from 1 June 2021 to 31 May 2024 shall be EUR 88 500 000.’;










(2)


Article 18 is replaced by the following:

‘Article 18
Strategic review
A strategic assessment of EUAM Ukraine shall be conducted after 31 May 2023, focused on the evolution in the political dimension.’;











(3)


in Article 19, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

                              ‘It shall apply until 31 May 2024.’.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 20 May 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. SANTOS SILVA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42.

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/761 of 13 May 2019 amending Decision 2014/486/CFSP on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 125, 14.5.2019, p. 16).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/804 of 20 May 2021 implementing Article 15(3) of Regulation (EU) No 747/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Sudan, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2021180EN.01000101.xml










21.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 180/1








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/804
of 20 May 2021
         
implementing Article 15(3) of Regulation (EU) No 747/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 747/2014 of 10 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Sudan and repealing Regulations (EC) No 131/2004 and (EC) No 1184/2005 (1), and in particular Article 15(3) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 10 July 2014 the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 747/2014.












(2)


On 5 March 2021 the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 1591(2005) approved the removal of one person from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 747/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 747/2014 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 20 May 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. SANTOS SILVA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 203, 11.7.2014, p. 1.




ANNEX
In the list set out in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 747/2014, the entry for the following person is deleted:






3.



SHAREIF, Adam.
Case T-275/21: Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski (Representation of a chequerboard pattern)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, leather, personal effects, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021263EN.01003601.xml










5.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/36






Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO — Wisniewski (Representation of a chequerboard pattern)
(Case T-275/21)
(2021/C 263/46)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Louis Vuitton Malletier (Paris, France) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, N. Parrotta and P.-Y. Gautier, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Norbert Wisniewski (Warsaw, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark representing a chequerboard pattern — International registration designating the European Union No 986 207

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 February 2021 in Case R 1307/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


alter the contested decision, by holding that the applicant has established acquired distinctiveness through use;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings;










—


order Mr. Norbert Wisniewski to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Articles 7(3) and 59(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-276/21: Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, electronic component, health service, medical device, medical diagnosis, registered trade mark, scientific apparatus, software, trade-mark law








C_2021278EN.01005801.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/58






Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care)
(Case T-276/21)
(2021/C 278/79)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Moio GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: E. Grande García, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark moio.care — Application for registration No 17 938 097

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2021 in Case R 1034/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision, in so far as it adversely affects the applicant;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as a likelihood of confusion under Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was established in relation to the earlier EU mark No 16 395 055, ‘Molicare’;










—


in the further alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as a likelihood of confusion was established for the goods claimed in Class 5 and the goods Data processing equipment; Peripheral devices for data reproduction; Mobile apps; Mobile data receivers; Mobile data communications apparatus; Transmitters [telecommunication]; Sensory software; Telecommunications software in Class 9;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-209/20: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Renesola UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Assessment of validity — Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1357/2013 — Determination of the country of origin of solar modules assembled in a third country from solar cells manufactured in another third country — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 24 — Origin of goods whose production involved more than one third country — Concept of ‘last substantial processing or working’)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: anti-dumping duty, customs union, designation of origin, originating product, photovoltaic cell, solar collector, third country








C_2021278EN.01002202.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/22






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Renesola UK Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
(Case C-209/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Assessment of validity - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1357/2013 - Determination of the country of origin of solar modules assembled in a third country from solar cells manufactured in another third country - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 24 - Origin of goods whose production involved more than one third country - Concept of ‘last substantial processing or working’)
(2021/C 278/31)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Renesola UK Ltd

Respondent: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Operative part of the judgment

Examination of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1357/2013 of 17 December 2013 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code.


(1)  OJ C 262, 10.8.2020.
Case C-128/19: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania v Assessorato della Salute della Regione Siciliana (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Agriculture sector — Slaughtering of animals affected by infectious diseases — Compensation for farmers — Notification and standstill requirements — Article 108(3) TFEU — Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Exemptions by categories of aid — Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 — De minimis aid — Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013)
Date: 2021-05-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, Sicily, State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, farmer, national law, restriction on competition, veterinarian








C_2021278EN.01000401.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/4






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 May 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania v Assessorato della Salute della Regione Siciliana
(Case C-128/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Agriculture sector - Slaughtering of animals affected by infectious diseases - Compensation for farmers - Notification and standstill requirements - Article 108(3) TFEU - Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Exemptions by categories of aid - Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 - De minimis aid - Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013)
(2021/C 278/04)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania

Defendant: Assessorato della Salute della Regione Siciliana

Intervener: AU

Operative part of the judgment

Article 108(3) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a measure introduced by a Member State to finance, for a period extending over several years and up to a maximum amount of EUR 20 million, both compensation to support farmers who have been obliged to slaughter animals affected by infectious diseases and payment of fees due to self-employed veterinary surgeons involved in remediation activities, must be subject to the preliminary-examination procedure laid down in that provision in the case where that measure is not covered by an authorisation decision of the European Commission to that effect, unless that measure fulfils the conditions laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU], or the conditions laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013 of 18 December 2013 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 [TFEU] to de minimis aid in the agriculture sector.


(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.