do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 April 2021 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic registers (COM(2021)0028 — C9-0016/2021 — 2021/0015(CNS))
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: administrative cooperation, carriage of goods, data processing, exchange of information, excise duty, export monitoring, goods and services, information system, surveillance concerning imports, tax harmonisation








C_2021506EN.01024601.xml










15.12.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 506/246






P9_TA(2021)0154
Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties: content of electronic registers *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 April 2021 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic registers (COM(2021)0028 — C9-0016/2021 — 2021/0015(CNS))
(Special legislative procedure — consultation)
(2021/C 506/47)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2021)0028),










—


having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C9-0016/2021),










—


having regard to Rule 82 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0121/2021),












1.


Approves the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Case C-847/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2021 — Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB v European Commission, Republic of Lithuania, Klaipėdos Nafta AB (Appeal — State aid — Decision not to raise any objections — Article 108 TFUE — Rights of the interested parties — Principle of sound administration — Diligent and impartial investigation — Scope of the review by the General Court — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Lithuania, State aid, award of contract, control of State aid, exchange of information, gas industry, gas pipeline, invitation to tender, right to justice, services of general interest








C_2021278EN.01001001.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/10






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 April 2021 — Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB v European Commission, Republic of Lithuania, Klaipėdos Nafta AB
(Case C-847/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Decision not to raise any objections - Article 108 TFUE - Rights of the interested parties - Principle of sound administration - Diligent and impartial investigation - Scope of the review by the General Court - Obligation to state reasons)
(2021/C 278/12)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB (represented by: R. Martens and V. Ostrovskis, advokatas)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by É. Gippini Fournier, N. Kuplewatzky and L. Armati, acting as Agents, and subsequently by E. Gippini Fournier, A. Bouchagiar and L. Armati, acting as Agents), Republic of Lithuania (represented by: R. Dzikovič and K. Dieninis, acting as Agents), Klaipėdos Nafta AB (represented by: K. Kačerauskas, and V. Vaitkutė Pavan, advokatai)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the main appeal;










2.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the cross-appeal;










3.


Orders Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in respect of the main appeal;










4.


Orders Achemos Grupė UAB, Achema AB and the European Commission to bear their own costs in respect of the cross-appeal;










5.


Orders the Republic of Lithuania and Klaipėdos Nafta AB to bear their own costs in respect of both the main appeal and the cross-appeal.






(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Case T-141/20: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, eco-label, energy consumption, energy efficiency, energy saving, equal treatment, household electrical appliance, labelling, marketing standard, principle of legal certainty








C_2021252EN.01003902.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/39






Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
(Case T-141/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/64)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Case T-139/20: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, eco-label, energy consumption, energy efficiency, energy saving, equal treatment, household electrical appliance, labelling, marketing standard, principle of legal certainty








C_2021252EN.01003804.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/38






Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
(Case T-139/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/62)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Commission Decision (EU) 2021/986 of 29 April 2021 approving the Decision of the Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community adopting new Agency Rules to determine the manner in which demand is to be balanced against the supply of ores, source materials and special fissile materials (notified under document C(2021) 2893) (Only the English text is authentic)
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Energy, European Commission
Subjects: Euratom Supply Agency, mining product, nuclear fuel, nuclear safety, radioactive materials, supply and demand








L_2021218EN.01000101.xml










18.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 218/1








            COMMISSION DECISION (EU) 2021/986
of 29 April 2021
         
approving the Decision of the Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community adopting new Agency Rules to determine the manner in which demand is to be balanced against the supply of ores, source materials and special fissile materials


(notified under document C(2021) 2893)


(Only the English text is authentic)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 60, sixth subparagraph thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 2 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (the ‘Euratom Treaty’), the European Atomic Energy Community is to ensure that all users in the Community receive a regular and equitable supply of ores and nuclear fuels, by means of a common supply policy based on the principle of equal access to sources of supply.












(2)


For that purpose, Article 52(2), point (b) of the Euratom Treaty established an Agency.












(3)


Rules adopted by the Agency require approval by the Commission, and are to determine the manner in which demand is to be balanced against supply of ores, source materials and special fissile materials.












(4)


The Agency, acting pursuant to the Euratom Treaty and its own statutes, adopted, by its Decision of 15 January 2021, new rules to update and replace the Agency rules currently in force.












(5)


Pursuant to Article 60, sixth subparagraph of the Euratom Treaty, the Agency rules should be approved by the Commission,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Decision of the Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community of 15 January 2021 adopting Agency Rules determining the manner in which demand is to be balanced against the supply of ores, source materials and special fissile materials, and repealing the Rules of the Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community of 5 May 1960 is hereby approved.


Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on 1 July 2021.


Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community. It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 29 April 2021.


For the Commission

Kadri SIMSON
            

Member of the Commission
Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/712 of 29 April 2021 implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Central African Republic, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








L_2021147EN.01001901.xml










30.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 147/19








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2021/712
of 29 April 2021
         
implementing Decision 2013/798/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2013/798/CFSP of 23 December 2013 concerning restrictive measures against the Central African Republic (1), and in particular Article 2c thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 23 December 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/798/CFSP.












(2)


On 5 April 2021, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 2127 (2013) approved the removal of one entity from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


The Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 29 April 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. P. ZACARIAS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 352, 24.12.2013, p. 51.




ANNEX
In the list set out in Part B (Entities) of the Annex to Decision 2013/798/CFSP, the entry for the following entity is deleted:






1.



Bureau d’achat de diamant en Centrafrique/Kardiam (alias: a) Badica/Krdiam b) Kardiam).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10164 — CVC/Stark Group) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 351/02
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building materials, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, retail selling








C_2021351EN.01001501.xml










1.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/15






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10164 — CVC/Stark Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 351/02)
On 29 April 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10164. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-815/19: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture and fisheries — Organic production and labelling of organic products — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Article 19(2) — Articles 21 and 23 — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — Article 27(1) — Article 28 — Annex IX, point 1.3 — Processing of organic food — Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin — Lithothamnium calcareum alga — Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga — Classification — Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment — Authorisation — Conditions)
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: algae, calcium, consumer information, eco-label, food processing, labelling, organic product, product designation








C_2021278EN.01000802.xml










12.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 278/8






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
(Case C-815/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture and fisheries - Organic production and labelling of organic products - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Article 19(2) - Articles 21 and 23 - Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Article 27(1) - Article 28 - Annex IX, point 1.3 - Processing of organic food - Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin - Lithothamnium calcareum alga - Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga - Classification - Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment - Authorisation - Conditions)
(2021/C 278/10)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Natumi GmbH

Defendant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen

intervener: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Operative part of the judgment

Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 of 5 September 2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1584 of 22 October 2018, must be interpreted as precluding the use of a powder obtained from the cleaned, dried and ground sediment of the alga Lithothamnium calcareum, as a non-organic ingredient of agricultural origin, within the meaning of Article 28 of Regulation No 889/2008, as amended by Implementing Regulation 2018/1584, in the processing of organic foodstuffs, such as rice- and soya-based organic drinks, for the purpose of their enrichment with calcium.


(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/707 of 29 April 2021 implementing Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Central African Republic, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








L_2021147EN.01000301.xml










30.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 147/3








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/707
of 29 April 2021
         
implementing Article 17(3) of Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 of 10 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic (1), and in particular Article 17(3) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 10 March 2014, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 224/2014.












(2)


On 5 April 2021, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Committee established pursuant to UNSC Resolution 2127 (2013) approved the removal of one entity from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 April 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. P. ZACARIAS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 70, 11.3.2014, p. 1.




ANNEX
In the list set out in Part B (Entities) of Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 224/2014, the entry for the following entity is deleted:






1.



Bureau d’achat de diamant en Centrafrique/Kardiam (alias: a) Badica/Krdiam b) Kardiam).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 28 April 2021 2021/C 152/02
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021152EN.01001001.xml










29.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/10






Euro exchange rates (1)

28 April 2021
(2021/C 152/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2070 




JPY


Japanese yen


131,47 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4360 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86988 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1110 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1044 




ISK


Iceland króna


148,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,9795 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,960 




HUF


Hungarian forint


361,75 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5859 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9288 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,8677 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5576 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4955 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,3696 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6711 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6010 




KRW


South Korean won


1 344,95 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3156 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8268 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5593 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 501,50 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9523 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,547 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,0220 




THB


Thai baht


37,852 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5620 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,1724 




INR


Indian rupee


89,8890 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-480/19: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by E (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 63 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Income tax — Income from capital — Income distributed by a resident undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with contract law — Income distributed by a UCITS established in another Member State and constituted in accordance with statute — Difference in treatment — Article 65 TFEU — Objectively comparable situations)
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, UCITS fund, capital gains tax, equal treatment, establishment, free movement of capital, investment income, residence, taxable income








C_2021263EN.01000302.xml










5.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/3






Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — proceedings brought by E
(Case C-480/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Income tax - Income from capital - Income distributed by a resident undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with contract law - Income distributed by a UCITS established in another Member State and constituted in accordance with statute - Difference in treatment - Article 65 TFEU - Objectively comparable situations)
(2021/C 263/04)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

E

joined party: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 63 and 65 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a tax practice of a Member State according to which, for the purpose of the taxation of income of a natural person residing in that Member State, the income received from an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) constituted in accordance with statute and established in another Member State cannot be equated with income received from UCITS established in the first Member State on the ground that the latter do not have the same legal form.


(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
Case T-140/20: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
Date: 2021-04-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, eco-label, energy consumption, energy efficiency, energy saving, equal treatment, labelling, lighting equipment, marketing standard, principle of legal certainty








C_2021252EN.01003901.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/39






Order of the General Court of 29 April 2021 — Applia v Commission
(Case T-140/20) (1)

(2021/C 252/63)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.