do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Update of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.) 2021/C 141/02
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: France, Schengen Agreement, border control, external border of the EU, foreign national, identity document, residence permit








C_2021141EN.01000201.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/2






Update of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1)

(2021/C 141/02)
The publication of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (2) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.
In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a regular update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.

LIST OF NATIONAL SERVICES RESPONSIBLE FOR BORDER CONTROL

FRANCE

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 74, 3.3. 2021








—


For the French Republic:






(a)


Border controls at border crossing points:
Direction centrale de la police aux frontières (Central Border Police Directorate), Direction Générale des Douanes et Droits Indirects (Directorate-General for Customs and Excise), Gendarmerie de l’Air (Air Gendarmerie);










(b)


Border surveillance between border crossing points: services de la Direction Générale des Douanes et Droits Indirects (departments of the Directorate-General for Customs and Excise), la Gendarmerie Nationale (the National Gendarmerie), la Marine Nationale (the French Navy) and l’ensemble des services de la Direction générale de la police nationale (all the departments of the Directorate-General of the National Police).









List of previous publications:


OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.

OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 1.

OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p.45.

OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 21.

OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15.

OJ C 87, 1.4.2010, p. 15.

OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 2.

OJ C 98, 5.4.2013, p. 2.

OJ C 256, 5.9.2013, p. 14.

OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 17.

OJ C 218, 7.7.2017, p. 19.

OJ C 431, 15.12.2017, p. 8.

OJ C 345, 27.9.2018, p. 4.

OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5.

OJ C 74, 3.3.2021, p. 5.


(1)  See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.

(2)  OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.
Case C-537/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/18/EC — Public works contracts — Contract between a public body and a private undertaking for the lease of building not yet constructed — Article 1 — Realisation of a work corresponding to requirements specified by the tenant — Article 16 — Precluded)
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Vienna, award of contract, building, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, property development, property leasing, tendering, works contract








C_2021228EN.01000401.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/4






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
(Case C-537/19) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/18/EC - Public works contracts - Contract between a public body and a private undertaking for the lease of building not yet constructed - Article 1 - Realisation of a work corresponding to requirements specified by the tenant - Article 16 - Precluded)
(2021/C 228/05)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Haasbeek, M. Noll-Ehlers and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented: initially by M. Fruhmann, and subsequently by J. Schmoll, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 141/05
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, aid to undertakings, cash and voucher assistance, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, tourism








C_2021141EN.01000501.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/5






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 141/05)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


15 December 2020




Case No


85926




Decision No


163/20/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 Prolongation of digital gift voucher scheme




Legal basis


Legislative act Amending Act No 54/2020 on Digital Vouchers (ice. lög um ferðagjöf)




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


To increase domestic demand for tourist services, thereby benefitting the tourist service sector




Form of aid


Grants (Indirect aid)




Budget


ISK 1,5 billion




Duration


31 May 2021




Economic sectors


Tourism




Name and address of the granting authority







The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs




Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu




101 Reykjavík




ICELAND








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case C-703/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — J.K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 98(2) — Option for Member States to apply one or two reduced VAT rates to certain supplies of goods and services — Classification of a commercial activity as ‘provision of services’ — Annex III, point 12a — Implementing regulation (EU) No 282/2011 — Article 6 — Concept of ‘restaurant and catering services’ — Meals ready for immediate consumption on the vendor’s premises or in a catering area — Meals ready for immediate consumption to be taken away)
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, catering industry, provision of services, tax relief








C_2021228EN.01000501.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/5






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — J.K. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach
(Case C-703/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98(2) - Option for Member States to apply one or two reduced VAT rates to certain supplies of goods and services - Classification of a commercial activity as ‘provision of services’ - Annex III, point 12a - Implementing regulation (EU) No 282/2011 - Article 6 - Concept of ‘restaurant and catering services’ - Meals ready for immediate consumption on the vendor’s premises or in a catering area - Meals ready for immediate consumption to be taken away)
(2021/C 228/06)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: J.K.

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach

Intervening party: Rzecznik Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorców

Operative part of the judgment

Article 98(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/47/EC of 5 May 2009, read in conjunction with point 12a of Annex III to that directive and Article 6 of Council Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 of 15 March 2011 implementing Directive 2006/112, must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘restaurant and catering services’ includes the supply of food accompanied by sufficient support services intended to enable the immediate consumption of that food by the end customer, which is a matter for the national court to determine. Where the end customer chooses not to benefit from the material and human resources made available by the taxable person to accompany the consumption of the food supplied, it must be concluded that no support services accompany the supply of that food.


(1)  OJ C 27, 27.1.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 141/09
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, energy efficiency, energy production, environmental protection, innovation, zinc








C_2021141EN.01000901.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/9






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 141/09)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


17 December 2020




Case No


85978




Decision No


161/20/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title


Environmental aid in favour of Boliden Odda AS for the realisation of the P350 project




Legal basis


The full scale innovative energy and climate technology programme, which has its basis in the Eco-Inn Scheme




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


Energy efficiency




Form of aid


Grant




Budget


NOK 341 million




Intensity


30 %




Duration


2021- end 2023




Economic sectors


Zinc metal production




Name and address of the granting authority







Enova




Brattørkaia 17A




7010  Trondheim




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 141/08
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, aid to undertakings, bus, carriage of passengers, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, maritime transport








C_2021141EN.01000801.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/8






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 141/08)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


17 December 2020




Case No


85996




Decision No


165/20/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 Compensation scheme for operators of year-round, commercial, long-distance scheduled bus or passenger boat services




Legal basis


The regulation on a temporary compensation scheme for operators of commercial bus and passenger boat routes with a loss in turnover caused by the COVID-19 outbreak




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


Compensation for loss incurred by Covid-19 outbreak and the infection control measures implemented by the Norwegian authorities, to ensure the continuity of year-round, commercial, long-distance bus and passenger boat services that do not receive compensation from local or other public authorities for public services obligation




Form of aid


Direct grants




Budget


NOK 200 million




Intensity


80 %




Duration


17.12.2020 – 15.8.2021




Economic sectors


Land and sea transport




Name and address of the granting authority







THE NORWEGIAN RAILWAY DIRECTORATE




JERNBANEDIREKTORATET




POSTBOKS 16 SENTRUM




NO-0101 OSLO




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case C-75/20: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Lifosa’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Community Customs Code — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Article 29(1) — Article 32(1)(e)(i) — Union Customs Code — Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 — Article 70(1) — Article 71(1)(e)(i) — Determination of the customs value — Transaction value — Adjustment — Price including delivery at the border)
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carriage of goods, carrier, customs territory (EU), customs union, customs valuation, goods and services, import (EU), transport price








C_2021228EN.01000802.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/8






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas — Lithuania) — ‘Lifosa’ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos
(Case C-75/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Community Customs Code - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Article 29(1) - Article 32(1)(e)(i) - Union Customs Code - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 - Article 70(1) - Article 71(1)(e)(i) - Determination of the customs value - Transaction value - Adjustment - Price including delivery at the border)
(2021/C 228/10)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant:‘Lifosa’ UAB

Respondent: Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Third parties: Kauno teritorinė muitinė, ‘Transchema’ UAB

Operative part of the judgment

Article 29(1) and Article 32(1)(e)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code and Article 70(1) and Article 71(1)(e)(i) of Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that, for the purpose of determining the customs value of imported goods, the costs actually incurred by the producer for their transport to the place where they have been brought into the customs territory of the European Union should not be added to the transaction value of the goods when, according to the agreed delivery terms, the obligation to cover those costs lies with the producer, even though those costs exceed the price actually paid by the importer, provided that that price corresponds to the real value of the goods, a matter which is for the referring court to establish.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 141/07
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, indemnification








C_2021141EN.01000701.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/7






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 141/07)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


17 December 2020




Case No


85922




Decision No


166/20/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 Compensation for cancellation or downscaling of large public events




Legal basis


Parliamentary decision authorising the scheme and setting out its main conditions and a letter of assignment from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries to Innovation Norway




Type of measure


Aid scheme




Objective


Compensation of damage caused by exceptional occurrence




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


NOK 350 million




Intensity


60 %




Duration


Until 30 June 2021




Economic sectors


All sectors




Name and address of the granting authority







Innovation Norway




Pb. 448 Sentrum, Akersgata 13




0104  Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Case C-258/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 22 April 2021 — Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH v R.G.
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective agreement, equal treatment, night work, supplementary income, wage determination








C_2021297EN.01002202.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 22 April 2021 — Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH v R.G.
(Case C-258/21)
(2021/C 297/25)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: Coca-Cola European Partners Deutschland GmbH

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: R.G.

Questions referred







1.


Does a collectively agreed rule implement Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC, (1) within the meaning of the first sentence of Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, if that collectively agreed rule provides for a higher level of compensation for irregular night work than for regular night work?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative:
Is a collectively agreed rule that provides for a higher level of compensation for irregular night work than for regular night work compatible with Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union if that rule is intended to compensate not only for the adverse effects on health caused by night work but also for the burden arising from the greater difficulty in planning for irregular night work?






(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/896 of 8 June 2016 concerning the authorisation of iron sodium tartrates as a feed additive for all animal species (Official Journal of the European Union L 152 of 9 June 2016)
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, European Commission
Subjects: animal feedingstuffs, food additive, market approval








L_2021137EN.01002001.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 137/20







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/896 of 8 June 2016 concerning the authorisation of iron sodium tartrates as a feed additive for all animal species

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 152 of 9 June 2016
)


On page 5, in the column ‘Composition, chemical formula, description, methods of analysis’, under ‘Characterisation of active substance’, of the Annex:
for:


                  ‘CAS number 1280193-05-9’,

read:


                  ‘CAS number 1280193-05-6’.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 141/11
Date: 2021-04-22
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, aid to undertakings, airport, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2021141EN.01001101.xml










22.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/11






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 141/11)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


18 December 2020




Case No


85892




Decision No


169/20/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title


COVID-19 Compensation to Keflavík Airport




Legal basis


The supplementary budget act for 2020 and the budget bill for 2021




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


To compensate Isavia for the damage related to the operation of Keflavík Airport in the period 1 March 2020 to 31 June 2021 as a direct consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the containment measures adopted by Iceland and other countries




Form of aid


Share capital increase




Budget


ISK 15 billion




Intensity


78,7 % (estimated)




Duration


March 2020 – June 2021




Economic sectors


H.51 - Air transport




Name and address of the granting authority







Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs




Arnarhvoli




101 Reykjavik




ICELAND








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/