do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-237/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 13 April 2021 — S.M.
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, European citizenship, carrying out of sentence, enforcement of ruling, extradition, international convention, public prosecution, third country








C_2021297EN.01002101.xml










26.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München (Germany) lodged on 13 April 2021 — S.M.
(Case C-237/21)
(2021/C 297/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings


Person whose surrender is sought: S.M.

Applicant: Generalstaatsanwaltschaft München

Question referred

Do the principles governing the application of Articles 18 and 21 TFEU established by the Court in its judgment of 13 November 2018 in Raugevicius (C-247/17, EU:C:2018:898) require that a request from a third country under the European Convention on Extradition of 13 December 1957 seeking the extradition of an EU citizen for the purpose of enforcing a sentence is to be refused, even where the requested Member State is obliged by international law under that Convention to extradite the EU citizen, because it has defined the term ‘nationals’ within the meaning of Article 6(1)(b) of the Convention as meaning that it refers only to its own nationals, not to other EU citizens?
Case C-238/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 13 April 2021 — Porr Bau GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: environmental protection, raw material, substitute product, waste recycling








C_2021242EN.01001401.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark (Austria) lodged on 13 April 2021 — Porr Bau GmbH v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung
(Case C-238/21)
(2021/C 242/18)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark

Parties to the main proceedings


Complainant: Porr Bau GmbH

Respondent authority: Bezirkshauptmannschaft Graz-Umgebung

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 preclude national legislation under which end-of-waste status is achieved only once waste or existing substances or the substances obtained from them are used directly as a substitute for raw materials or for products made from primary raw materials or they have been prepared for reuse?
If Question 1 is answered in the negative:










2.


Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 preclude national legislation under which end-of-waste status in respect of extracted materials can be achieved at the earliest when they serve as a substitute for raw materials or for products made from primary raw materials?
If Question 1 and/or Question 2 is/are answered in the negative:










3.


Does Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 preclude national legislation under which end-of-waste status in respect of extracted materials cannot be achieved if formal criteria (in particular record-keeping and documentation obligations) which have no environmentally relevant influence on the measure carried out are not complied with or are not complied with in full, even though the extracted materials demonstrably fall below the limit values (premium) to be complied with for the specific intended use?






(1)  Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (OJ 2008 L 312, p. 3).
Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/585 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/584 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply 2021/C 129/09
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2021129EN.01001401.xml










13.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/14






Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as implemented by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/585 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/584 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2021/C 129/09)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/585 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/584 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council of the European Union has decided that those persons should be included on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2021, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 124 I, 12.4.2021, p. 7.


(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 124 I, 12.4.2021, p. 1.
Council Decision of 13 April 2021 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Italy 2021/C 149 I/01
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Italy, advisory committee (EU), appointment of members, free movement of workers




CI2021149EN.01000101.xml










27.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 149/1






COUNCIL DECISION
of 13 April 2021
appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for Italy
(2021/C 149 I/01)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union (1), and in particular Articles 23 and 24 thereof,
Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Government of Italy,
Whereas:






(1)


By its Decision of 21 September 2020 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period from 25 September 2020 to 24 September 2022.










(2)


The Government of Italy has submitted nominations for several posts to be filled,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers for the period ending on 24 September 2022:






I.


GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Ms Maria Concetta CORINTO
Mr Marco Maria Carlo COVIELLO


Ms Carmen FERRAJOLO














II.


TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Ms Ilaria Arianna FONTANIN
Mr Emanuele GALOSSI


Ms Antonella PIRASTU














III.


EMPLOYERS’ ASSOCIATIONS REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Italy


Ms Paola ASTORRI
Mr Fabio ANTONILLI


Ms Roberta DIONISI










Article 2
The members and alternate members not yet nominated will be appointed by the Council at a later date.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.


Done at Brussels, 13 April 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. P. ZACARIAS




(1)  OJ L 141, 27.5.2011, p. 1.

(2)  Council Decision of 21 September 2020 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Freedom of Movement for Workers (OJ C 315 I, 23.9.2020, p. 5).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 12 April 2021 2021/C 129/11
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021129EN.01001701.xml










13.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/17






Euro exchange rates (1)

12 April 2021
(2021/C 129/11)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1904 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,20 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4369 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86518 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1975 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0998 




ISK


Iceland króna


151,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0940 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,031 




HUF


Hungarian forint


356,43 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5246 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9203 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,7038 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5613 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4931 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2564 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6914 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5964 




KRW


South Korean won


1 338,46 




ZAR


South African rand


17,3878 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7907 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5673 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 391,62 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9199 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,845 




RUB


Russian rouble


91,9588 




THB


Thai baht


37,504 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,7460 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,9690 




INR


Indian rupee


89,3020 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-202/21: Action brought on 13 April 2021 — Vita Zahnfabrik v EUIPO — VIPI Produtos Odontológicos (VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte)
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dental medicine, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021217EN.01006301.xml










7.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/63






Action brought on 13 April 2021 — Vita Zahnfabrik v EUIPO — VIPI Produtos Odontológicos (VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte)
(Case T-202/21)
(2021/C 217/79)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG (Bad Säckingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Theis and F. Hauck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VIPI Indústria, Comércio, Exportação E Importação De Produtos Odontológicos LTDA (Pirassununga, Brazil)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte — International registration designating the European Union No 1 346 271

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 February 2021 in Case R 818/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


alter the contested decision in the way that the opposition against the European Union part of the international registration No 1 346 271 is dismissed in its entirety and that the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO are imposed on the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;










—


annul the contested decision as an auxiliary request;










—


impose the costs of these proceedings before the General Court on EUIPO.





Plea in law







—


Misapplication of Articles 47(5) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-12/21 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT (Application for interim relief — Civil service — Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis — Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment — Application for an exemption — Refusal decision — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Urgency — Prima facie case — Balancing of interests)
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, Germany, Hungary, coronavirus disease, epidemic, public authorities, staff regulations (EU), teleworking








C_2021242EN.01004801.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/48






Order of the President of the General Court of 13 April 2021 — PJ v EIT
(Case T-12/21 R)
(Application for interim relief - Civil service - Measures for the organisation of work during the health crisis - Prohibition of teleworking outside the country of employment - Application for an exemption - Refusal decision - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Application for interim measures - Urgency - Prima facie case - Balancing of interests)
(2021/C 242/68)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PJ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Institute of Innovation and Technology (represented by: P. Juanes Burgos, acting as Agent, and by A. Duron, lawyer)

Re:

APPLICATION under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for (i) the suspension of operation of the decision of the EIT of 17 December 2020 to refuse the applicant’s request to telework from her place of origin and (ii) an order that EIT should authorise her to telework from her place of origin until restrictions relating to the health crisis imposed by the German and Hungarian national authorities are lifted.

Operative part of the order







1.


The operation of the decision of the Director of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) of 17 December 2020, refusing PJ’s request to telework from her place of origin, is suspended.










2.


The EIT shall authorise PJ to telework from the place of residence of her children subject to this being justified by the circumstances relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and without prejudice to the requirement that PJ travel to her place of employment on an ad hoc basis for reasons relating to the interests of the service.










3.


The costs are reserved.
Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/595 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/587 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply 2021/C 129/07
Date: 2021-04-13
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2021129EN.01001101.xml










13.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 129/11






Notice for the attention of the persons to whom measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/595 and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/587 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran apply
(2021/C 129/07)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/595 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/587 (4) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 359/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 31 December 2021, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




RELEX.1.C




General Secretariat




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council’s decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, 4th and 6th paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 125, 13.4.2021, p. 58


(3)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1


(4)  OJ L 125, 13.4.2021, p. 1