Commission Notice concerning the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties 2021/C 118/06
Date: 2021-04-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: anti-dumping duty, customs drawback, customs formalities, import (EU), originating product




C_2021118EN.01005901.xml










7.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 118/59






Commission Notice concerning the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties
(2021/C 118/06)
This Notice sets out the guidelines on how to apply for a refund of anti-dumping duties under Article 11(8) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) (the ‘basic Regulation’). These guidelines repeal and replace those published in 2014 (2). The purpose of the guidelines is to clarify for the different parties involved in a refund procedure the conditions to be fulfilled by an application and to give a comprehensive step-by-step explanation of the procedure that may lead to a reimbursement.
1.   Aim

The refund procedure is intended to reimburse anti-dumping duties paid where it is shown that the dumping margin, on the basis on which duties were established, has been eliminated or reduced. It involves an investigation into the exporting producer’s exports to the Union and a calculation of a new dumping margin.
2.   Basic principles governing a refund procedure

2.1.   What are the conditions to be fulfilled?

Applications for refund under Article 11(8) of the basic Regulation must demonstrate that the dumping margin, on the basis of which duties were established, has decreased or has been eliminated. In other circumstances, the provisions of Section 3 of Chapter 3 in Title III of the Union Customs Code concerning the repayment and remission of import duties may apply (3).
2.2.   Who is entitled to apply for a refund?







(a)


Any importer who imported goods for which anti-dumping duties were established by customs authorities may apply for a refund.










(b)


Where anti-dumping duties were imposed further to an investigation in which the Commission resorted to a sample of exporting producers to assess dumping pursuant to Article 17 of the basic Regulation, importers can request a refund regardless of whether the importers’ exporting producers were sampled or not.




2.3.   What is the deadline to apply for a refund?







(a)


Applications must be submitted within six months of the date when the amount of the anti-dumping duties was determined by the competent customs authorities, i.e. the date of notification of the customs debt by the customs authorities under Article 102 of the Union Customs Code. The submission must be done to the competent authority of the Member State (4) in which the goods were cleared for free circulation in the Union (see 3.2 and 3.3 below).










(b)


Even if an importer is challenging the validity of anti-dumping duties applied to its imports under the provisions of the Customs legislation of the Union, whether this action suspends the payment of duties or not, the importer must nonetheless introduce an application for a refund within the six-month time limit from the determination of duties in order for the application to be admissible.










(c)


The Commission may in agreement with the applicant decide to suspend the refund investigation until the liability to the anti-dumping duties has been finally established.




2.4.   How is the revised dumping margin established?







(a)


The Commission will establish, for a representative period, a dumping margin in respect of all the exports of the product concerned made by the exporting producer to all its importers in the Union and not only to the importer claiming a refund.










(b)


Consequently, the refund investigation will cover all product control numbers (5) falling under the product definition set out in the Regulation imposing the anti-dumping duties and not only those of the products imported by the applicant.










(c)


Unless circumstances have changed, the same methodology as the one applied during the investigation that led to the duty will be followed.




2.5.   Whose cooperation is required?

Successful completion of a refund application is not only dependent upon the cooperation of the applicant but also on the cooperation of the exporting producer. The applicant has to ensure that the exporting producer submits the relevant information to the Commission. This implies completing a questionnaire covering a wide range of commercial data for a defined representative period in the past and accepting the examination of such information including a verification visit. An exporting producer cannot ‘partially cooperate’ by submitting only selective data. Any such approach would lead the Commission to the conclusion that it was not cooperating and to the rejection of the application.
2.6.   How is confidential information protected?

The rules of confidentiality as laid down in Article 19 of the basic Regulation apply to all information received in connection with the applications for a refund of anti-dumping duties.
2.7.   How much may be refunded?

If the admissibility and merits of the application are established, the investigation may result in:






—


no refund of the anti-dumping duties paid when the dumping margin is found equal or higher to the anti-dumping duty collected;
or










—


the refund of a part of the anti-dumping duties paid when the dumping margin has decreased below the anti-dumping duty collected;
or










—


the refund of all of the anti-dumping duties paid when the dumping margin has been eliminated.




2.8.   What is the deadline to finalise the refund investigation?

The Commission should normally decide on the refund within 12 months and in no circumstances within more than 18 months, from the date on which the application for refund is duly supported by evidence. Under Article 11(8) third paragraph of the basic Regulation, an application is duly supported by evidence where it contains precise information on the amount of refund of anti-dumping duty claimed, all customs documentation related to the determination and payment of such duties and information on normal values (see points 3.5 to 3.7 and 4(d) below) and export prices for the exporting producer to which the duty applies (see point 4 below).
Where a refund is granted, Member States authorities have 90 days from the date when the Commission Decision is notified to them to make the relevant payment.
3.   The application

3.1.   Form of the application

The application must be submitted in writing, in an official language of the Union and signed by a person empowered to represent the applicant. The application must be made on the form attached as Annex I to this notice.
The application must clearly indicate the total amount of anti-dumping duties for which a refund is sought and identify the specific import transactions on which that total is based.
The application must be based on a reduction or an elimination of the dumping margin. It must therefore include a statement that the dumping margin of the applicant’s exporting producer, on the basis of which the anti-dumping duties have been established, has decreased below the level of the duty applicable to the imports for which a refund is requested or has been eliminated.
3.2.   Submission of the application

The application must be submitted to the competent authorities of the Member State on whose territory the product concerned by the anti-dumping duties was released for free circulation (6). The list of the competent authorities is published on the website of DG Trade.
The Member State should immediately forward the application and all relevant documentation to the Commission. Without prejudice to any other forms of sending, this shall be done electronically.
3.3.   Time-limits for the submission of an application







(a)


Six-month time-limit
All applications for reimbursement must be submitted to the competent authorities of the appropriate Member State within the six-month time-limit (7) set out in Article 11(8) second paragraph of the basic Regulation.
The deadline of six months must be respected even in cases where a Regulation imposing the duty in question is being challenged before the Courts of the European Union or where the application of the Regulation is being challenged before national administrative or judicial bodies (see point 2.3(b) above).
Depending on each specific case, the six-month time-limit will be counted from:






 


the date of entry into force of a Regulation imposing a definitive duty and collecting amounts secured by way of a provisional duty, when provisional duties are being definitively collected;
or










 


the date of determination of the definitive anti-dumping duty, i.e. the date of notification of the customs debt by the customs authorities under Article 102 of the Union Customs Code.
or










 


where the correct amount of duties is established pursuant to a post-clearance check, the latter date of determination of the duties payable applies.














(b)


Date of submission of the application
When forwarding the application to the Commission, the Member State must indicate the date of submission of the application, i.e. the date on which the Member State’s competent authority has effectively received the application.
For their own benefit, applicants should obtain evidence of the receipt of their application at the offices of the appropriate Member State. For instance:






 


postal applications can be sent by registered mail accompanied by a form for acknowledgement of receipt;










 


the date of receipt of a fax by the Member State’s competent authority can be determined by reference to the date indicated on the successful transmission report and the fax journal;










 


the date of a formal acknowledgement of receipt when the application is submitted by hand or electronically.








3.4.   Evidence requested from the applicant

In order to enable the Commission to process the application, the applicant should enclose with its application submitted to the relevant Member State to the extent possible (8) the below evidence:






(a)


all invoice(s) and other documents on which customs procedures were based;










(b)


all customs documents identifying the import transactions for which a refund is sought, showing specifically the basis for determining the amount of the duties to be levied (the type, quantity and value of the goods declared and the rate of anti-dumping duty applied), as well as the precise amount of the anti-dumping duties levied;










(c)


declarations that:






(i)


the duty collected has not been reimbursed by the exporting producer or by any third party;










(ii)


the prices on which the application is based are genuine;










(iii)


there is no compensatory arrangement made before, since or simultaneously with the sale(s) under consideration;














(d)


information on normal values and on export prices that show that the dumping margin of the exporting producer has decreased under the level of the duty in force or has been eliminated. This is particularly important where the applicant is associated with the exporting producer.

If the applicant is not associated with the exporting producer, and if the relevant information is not immediately available, the application should contain a statement from the exporting producer that the dumping margin has been reduced or eliminated and that it will provide to the Commission all the relevant supporting data. This is the data on normal values and on export prices for a representative period during which its goods were exported to the Union. This period will be later determined by the Commission (see 4.1(a)).

If the exporting producer is based in certain countries that are not members of the WTO, the normal value will be determined under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation (see 3.5 for more information on the procedure regarding certain countries that are not members of the WTO).

If the exporting producer is located in a country where significant distortions within the meaning of Article 2(6a)(b) of the basic Regulation were found to exist as regards the applicable duty, the normal value will be determined under Article 2(6a) of the basic Regulation (see 3.6 for more information on the procedure regarding countries with significant distortions).
For information concerning the transition period for the determination of normal value, see 3.7.










(e)


corporate information relating to the applicant;










(f)


power of attorney if the application is submitted by a third party;










(g)


a list of import transactions for which a refund is claimed (for the convenience of the applicant a pre-form with the requested information is attached to this notice as Annex II);










(h)


proof of payment of anti-dumping duties for which a refund is claimed.
Copies of originals of invoices, customs entry forms and other such documents must be provided with a declaration of their authenticity from the applicant or the exporting producer as the case may be. In addition, such documents, or their translations, should be in one of the official languages of the Union.




The Commission will assess whether the application contains all of the information requested from the applicant. If need be, the Commission will notify the applicant of the information still to be submitted and will specify a deadline for the requested evidence to be submitted. The Commission reserves the right to ask for additional evidence that supports the application.
3.5.   Evidence of normal value in case of imports from certain countries which are not members of the WTO

If a refund is requested for duties on imports from a country which is not a member of the WTO and listed in Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9), normal value will be established under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation and in accordance with the methodology applied as regards the applicable duty to imports at issue.
In this case, the normal value is determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in an appropriate analogue country and the applicant should identify and seek the cooperation of a producer in an analogue country.
It should seek cooperation from the same companies that cooperated in the original investigation, unless it can demonstrate that the use of other producers in the same country or the data of another analogue country is more appropriate.
If the applicant cannot obtain any cooperation, it can propose any other method under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation and provide the data necessary to calculate normal values on the basis of such other method. The applicant should provide satisfactory evidence that it has unsuccessfully sought cooperation from all the known producers of the product under investigation.
If the applicant fails to provide data for the calculation of normal values in line with Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation, within a reasonable period of time, the Commission shall reject the application due to lack of supporting evidence.
3.6.   Evidence of normal value in case of imports from a country with significant distortions

If a refund is requested for duties on imports from a country where it was determined in the original investigation or following an expiry review that significant distortions within the meaning of Article 2(6a)(b) of the basic Regulation exist as regards the applicable duty at issue, the normal value will normally be determined under Article 2(6a) of the basic Regulation.
In this case, the normal value will be constructed exclusively on the basis of costs of production and sale reflecting undistorted prices or benchmarks.
For information on the transition period for the application of this methodology, see 3.7.
3.7.   Transition period for the methodology to determine normal value

In accordance with Article 11(4) of the basic Regulation, during a transition period, the methodology for non-market economy countries in force until 19 December 2017 will be applied to determine normal value if:






—


The refund is requested for duties based on a normal value calculated according to the methodology for non-market economy countries as it was in force until 19 December 2017










—


Until the date on which the first expiry review of these measures, after 19 December 2017, is initiated (10).




For this purpose, the provisions of the basic Regulation in force until 19 December 2017 (‘the 2017 basic Regulation’) (11) apply. In such cases, the normal value will be determined under Article 2(7)(a) of the 2017 basic Regulation unless the exporting producer receives market economy treatment (‘MET’) under Article 2(7)(c) of the 2017 basic Regulation.
If MET is not applied, normal value will be determined under Article 2(7)(a) of the 2017 basic Regulation, on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country (‘analogue country’). The applicant should identify and seek the cooperation of a producer in an analogue country.
It should seek cooperation from the same companies that cooperated in the original investigation, unless it can demonstrate that the use of other producers in the same country or the data of another analogue country is more appropriate.
If the applicant cannot obtain any cooperation, it can propose any other method under Article 2(7)(a) of the 2017 basic Regulation and provide the data necessary to calculate normal values on the basis of such other method. The applicant should provide satisfactory evidence that it has unsuccessfully sought cooperation from all the known producers of the product under investigation.
If the applicant fails to provide data for the calculation of normal values in line with Article 2(7)(a) of the 2017 basic Regulation within a reasonable period of time, the Commission shall reject the application due to lack of supporting evidence.
3.8.   Recurring applications

As soon as the applicant is aware that it intends to submit more than one application for refund of anti-dumping duties levied on the product concerned, it should notify the Commission. This information is requested in order for the Commission to structure the investigation in the most efficient and effective way.
4.   Assessing the merits of an application

The Commission will contact the exporting producer and request information on its normal value and export prices for a given representative period. The application will only be considered duly supported by evidence (12) when all requested information and the completed questionnaires (including replies to any material deficiencies that may have been identified) have been received by the Commission.






(a)


Representative period
For the purpose of determining the revised dumping margin, the Commission will specify the representative period that will normally cover a minimum of six months and include a short period prior to the date of invoicing by the exporting producer of the first transaction for which a refund is sought.










(b)


Dumping questionnaires
Pursuant to Article 6(2) of the basic Regulation, the exporting producer of the applicant and, where appropriate, the related importer(s), will be asked to submit information concerning all their sales to the Union, and not only sales to the applicant, made during the representative period.
The information will be sought by means of a questionnaire sent to the applicant’s exporting producer (and to any related importer in the Union) with replies due within 37 days.
The exporting producer may send confidential information directly to the Commission and not via the applicant. A non-confidential version of the reply to the questionnaire and of any other confidential information submitted should be provided in accordance with Article 19(2) of the basic Regulation. Such non-confidential information will be made available for inspection by interested parties and can be accessed online via TRON.tdi (https://tron.trade.ec.europa.eu/tron/TDI).










(c)


Market Economy Treatment (‘MET’)
If the transition period referred to in 3.7 applies, the exporting producer can apply for MET for the purposes of the refund investigation. In this case, it will have to submit all the requested information under Article 2(7)(c) of the 2017 basic Regulation.
If MET is granted to the exporting producer, the normal value will be established on the basis of its own prices and costs under Article 2(1) - (6) of the 2017 basic Regulation.
If MET is not granted, the normal value will be established under Article 2(7)(c) of the 2017 basic Regulation.
The MET determination in a refund investigation will apply only for the purpose of determining the dumping margin during the refund representative period.
The granting of MET for the purposes of the refund investigation is regardless whether the exporting producer has already been granted MET in the original investigation, or if it has cooperated in the original investigation.










(d)


Exports from certain countries which are not members of the WTO
If a refund is requested for duties on exports from certain countries which are not members of the WTO, normal value shall be established under Article 2(7) of the basic Regulation (see point 3.5 for the necessary evidence to be provided by the applicant).










(e)


Exports from countries with significant distortions
In addition to the procedure mentioned under (b) above, the exporting producer of the applicant will be asked to submit information concerning the factors of production used during the representative period.
The information will be sought by means of a form sent to the applicant’s exporting producer with replies due within 15 days.










(f)


Verification visits
Parties submitting information should be aware that the Commission may verify the information received through a verification visit under Article 16 of the basic Regulation.




4.1.   Analysis of merits







(a)


General methodology
The revised dumping margin will be established by comparing, for the representative period:






—


the normal value(s),










—


and the export price(s),




for the exported product(s) in question, in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 2 of the basic Regulation.
Article 11(9) of the basic Regulation provides for the use of ‘the same methodology as in the investigation which led to the duty, with due account being taken of Article 2 (Determination of dumping), and in particular paragraphs 11 and 12 thereof (Use of weighted averages in calculating the dumping margin), and of Article 17 (Sampling).’
The Commission may base the calculation of the revised dumping margin on a sample of the exporting producers, types of product or transactions concerned by the application(s), on the basis of Article 17 of the basic Regulation, in particular paragraph 3. The sampling will apply where the number of exporting producers, types of product or transactions concerned is so large that individual examinations would be unduly burdensome and prevent completion of the investigation in good time. This will be determined at the minimum over a period of 6 months counted from the date of lodging of the first request, or 12 months counted from the date of imposition of definitive measures, whichever is the later.










(b)


Implementation of Article 11(10) of the basic Regulation
Where the export price is constructed under Article 2(9) of the basic Regulation, the Commission shall calculate it with no deduction for the amount of anti-dumping duties paid when conclusive evidence is provided that the duty is duly reflected in resale prices and the subsequent selling prices in the Union. The Commission will examine whether an increase in selling prices to independent Union customers between the original and the refund investigation period incorporates the anti-dumping duties.










(c)


Use of review findings
When examining any application for refund, the Commission may decide at any time to initiate an interim review in accordance with Article 11(3) of the basic Regulation. The procedure regarding the application for refund will be suspended until the conclusion of the review.
The findings of the review investigation may only be used to determine the merits of a refund application provided that the date of the transactions for which a refund is being claimed falls within the investigation period of the review.










(d)


Extrapolation
Notwithstanding point (c) above, for purposes of administrative efficiency, the dumping margin established in any investigation may be extrapolated for import transactions submitted for refund not occurring in that investigation period. This is subject to the following conditions:






 


extrapolation may only be implemented for a period immediately adjacent to a period which has been investigated;










 


the maximum period for which investigation results might be extrapolated is six months;










 


extrapolation may only be applied when the dumping margin has been calculated and established on the basis of a completed investigation;










 


extrapolation will only be applied to a sum of duties that is relatively small in the context of the entire refund application.








4.2.   Non-cooperation

In cases in which the applicant, the exporting producer or the producer in an analogue country (where applicable):






 


supplies false or misleading information;
or










 


refuses access to relevant information or does not provide it within a reasonable period of time;
or










 


significantly impedes the investigation, including impeding the verification of the information to the extent deemed necessary by the Commission
the information will be disregarded and the Commission may conclude that the applicant did not meet its burden of proof obligations. This may lead to a rejection of the application, pursuant to Article 11(8) third paragraph of the basic Regulation.




4.3.   Disclosure

Once the investigation of the merits of the application is completed, the applicant will receive disclosure of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Commission intends to adopt a decision on the refund application. The cooperating exporting producer(s) may only receive information on the treatment of their particular data, in particular the resulting calculations of normal value and export prices.
5.   Outcome

5.1.   Excess amount to be repaid

The excess amount to be reimbursed to the applicant will normally be calculated as the difference between the duty collected and the dumping margin established in the refund investigation, as an absolute sum.
5.2.   Payment

The reimbursement should normally be paid by the Member State where anti-dumping duties were determined and later collected within 90 days of the date of the notification of the refund decision.
Whether or not any payment made after 90 days give rise to the payment of interest remains subject to the national legislation of each Member State.
5.3.   Revocation of a decision to reimburse

Where it is subsequently found that a decision granting a refund has been adopted on the basis of false or incomplete information, such decision will be revoked retroactively. Indeed, the fact that a refund decision has been based on false or incomplete information amounts to the absence of an objective legal basis for this decision, which therefore deprives ab initio the applicant of the right to obtain a refund and justifies the revocation of the decision.
As a result of such revocation, the refunded amounts corresponding to the original anti-dumping duties will be re-collected.
Once the Commission has adopted a decision to revoke a refund, the Member State concerned ensures that this decision is correctly implemented, within its territory, by recovering the amounts unduly refunded under Article 11(8) of the basic Regulation.
The national authorities of the Member State concerned, when implementing such a decision, act in accordance with the procedural and substantive rules of their own national law. The application of the national law should not affect the scope and effectiveness of the Commission decision to revoke its former decision granting a refund.
5.4.   Transparency

The non-confidential version of Commission decisions under Article 11(8) of the basic Regulation, as well as the ongoing refund investigations, are published on the website of DG TRADE.


(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21).

(2)  Commission Notice concerning the reimbursement of anti-dumping duties (OJ C 164, 29.5.2014, p. 9).

(3)  Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1).

(4)  The procedure described in this Notice applies mutatis mutandis to requests for refunds filed by importers that paid Union anti-dumping duties on the importation of goods that were customs cleared in Northern Ireland, in accordance with heading 5 of Annex II of the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland to the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ CI 384, 12.11.2019, p. 1) as amended by Decision no 3/2020 of the Joint Committee established by the agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 443, 30.12.2020, p. 3).

(5)  Product control numbers are created for the purpose of calculating the dumping margin for each unique type and possible combination of product characteristics, for all products produced and exported to the European Union as well as for those sold domestically.

(6)  Refund applications for products brought to the continental shelf or exclusive economic zone of a Member State must be submitted to the authorities of the Member State that determined the customs debt in accordance with Article 4 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1131 of 2 July 2019 establishing a customs tool in order to implement Article 14a of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 24a of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

(7)  For computation of the time-limit, see Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits (OJ L 124, 8.6.1971, p. 1).

(8)  Where information is not available at the moment of lodging the application, such information must be submitted directly to the Commission, after the lodging.

(9)  Regulation (EU) 2015/755 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2015 on common rules for imports from certain third countries (OJ L 123, 19.5.2015, p. 33).

(10)  See Article 11(3) fourth paragraph of the basic Regulation.

(11)  For the relevant provisions, please see Annex III.

(12)  See Article 11(8) fourth indent of the basic Regulation.




ANNEX I

REFUND APPLICATION FORM (1)









(1)  An electronic version of this form is available on European Commission, DG TRADE websitehttps://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/november/tradoc_152900.pdf





ANNEX II

IMPORT TRANSACTION TABLE




















a




b




c




d




e




f




g




h




i




j




k




l




m




n






Transaction #




Purchase invoice #




Purchase invoice date




Name of supplier / exporter




Name of producer in country of origin




Country of origin




Product type (name)




Product type (reference or model n°)




Tariff / CN code




QTY purchased




Invoice value




Curr.




Unit price




Date of payment of invoice





1


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




2


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




3


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




4


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




5


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




6


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




Explanatory notes to the table:







a


Transaction #


Each transaction should be marked with a sequential number which should also be put on the supporting documents (e.g. invoice) concerned




h


Product type reference, or model no.


State the commercial reference number or code of the product.




s


Date of shipment


State the date on which the products were shipped by the supplier




w


Customs value (basis for duty)


This should be the customs value as shown on the customs records. Normally the customs value is based on the invoice value plus freight / insurance expenses.




v


Date duties duly established by customs


This is the date on which the duties are determined by customs, which is, in normal cases the date of acceptance of the customs entry.




aa


Date of payment of duties


This is the date on which the duties were actually paid to the customs. Thus, this should be the date on which the amount concerned was transferred from the company’s bank account to the customs' bank account.




 


Payment reference


Provide a reference to the invoice payment records (e.g. bank statement number and date)




 


Currency


Please use ISO codes. A list of ISO codes is available on Internet :http://www.cc.cec/inforecu/files.htm





Determination of the admissibility of a refund application. Annex: Import transaction table




















o




p




q




r




s




t




u




v




w




x




y




z




aa




ab






Payment reference




Exchange rate




Invoice value in currency of importer




Incoterms




Date of shipment




Freight amount




Customs record (SAD #)




Date duties duly established by customs




Customs value (basis for duty)




Curr.




AD-duty rate (%)




AD-duty amount




Date of payment of duties




Payment reference





 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




Incoterms






EXW


Ex works




FCA


Free carrier




FAS


Free alongside ship




FOB


Free on board




CFR


Cost and freight




CIF


Cost, insurance and freight




CPT


Carriage paid to




CIP


Carriage and insurance paid to




DAF


Delivered at frontier




DES


Delivered ex ship




DEQ


Delivered ex quay (duty paid)




DDU


Delivered duty unpaid




DDP


Delivered duty paid









ANNEX III
Extract of Article 2(7) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union, as it was in force until 19 December 2017

7.   








(a)


In the case of imports from non-market-economy countries (1), the normal value shall be determined on the basis of the price or constructed value in a market economy third country, or the price from such a third country to other countries, including the Union, or, where those are not possible, on any other reasonable basis, including the price actually paid or payable in the Union for the like product, duly adjusted if necessary to include a reasonable profit margin.
An appropriate market-economy third country shall be selected in a not unreasonable manner, due account being taken of any reliable information made available at the time of selection. Account shall also be taken of time limits. Where appropriate, a market-economy third country that is subject to the same investigation shall be used.
The parties to the investigation shall be informed shortly after its initiation of the market-economy third country envisaged and shall be given 10 days to comment.










(b)


In anti-dumping investigations concerning imports from the People's Republic of China, Vietnam and Kazakhstan and any non-market-economy country which is a member of the WTO at the date of the initiation of the investigation, the normal value shall be determined in accordance with paragraphs 1 to 6, if it is shown, on the basis of properly substantiated claims by one or more producers subject to the investigation and in accordance with the criteria and procedures set out in point (c), that market-economy conditions prevail for this producer or producers in respect of the manufacture and sale of the like product concerned. When that is not the case, the rules set out under point (a) shall apply.










(c)


A claim under point (b) must be made in writing and contain sufficient evidence that the producer operates under market-economy conditions, that is if:






—


decisions of firms regarding prices, costs and inputs, including for instance raw materials, cost of technology and labour, output, sales and investment, are made in response to market signals reflecting supply and demand, and without significant State interference in that regard, and costs of major inputs substantially reflect market values,










—


firms have one clear set of basic accounting records which are independently audited in line with international accounting standards and are applied for all purposes,










—


the production costs and financial situation of firms are not subject to significant distortions carried over from the former non-market-economy system, in particular in relation to depreciation of assets, other write-offs, barter trade and payment via compensation of debts,










—


the firms concerned are subject to bankruptcy and property laws which guarantee legal certainty and stability for the operation of firms, and










—


exchange rate conversions are carried out at the market rate.













(1)  Including Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Mongolia, North Korea, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.