do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 29 March 2021 2021/C 112/01
Date: 2021-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021112EN.01000101.xml










30.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

29 March 2021
(2021/C 112/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1784 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,19 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4360 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85120 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2205 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1075 




ISK


Iceland króna


151,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0738 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,079 




HUF


Hungarian forint


362,32 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6457 




RON


Romanian leu


4,9025 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,6209 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5398 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4833 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1618 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6805 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5860 




KRW


South Korean won


1 334,49 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6924 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7334 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5723 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 021,99 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8803 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,112 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,4425 




THB


Thai baht


36,731 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,7964 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,4513 




INR


Indian rupee


85,5038 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-168/21: Action brought on 30 March 2021 — Magnetec v EUIPO (Light blue)
Date: 2021-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alloy, electrical engineering, electronic component, insulator, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021217EN.01004601.xml










7.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/46






Action brought on 30 March 2021 — Magnetec v EUIPO (Light blue)
(Case T-168/21)
(2021/C 217/61)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Magnetec GmbH (Langenselbold, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske and D. Habel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU colour mark (Light blue) — Application for registration No 18 022 608

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2021 in Case R 217/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 49(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Article 33 thereof;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10039 — Kronospan Holdings/M. Kaindl) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 143/02
Date: 2021-03-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, sale, wood industry








C_2021143EN.01000201.xml










23.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 143/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10039 — Kronospan Holdings/M. Kaindl)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 143/02)
On 30 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10039. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10061 — Coca Cola Hellenic Bottling Company/Heineken/Stockday) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 251/01
Date: 2021-03-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: alcoholic beverage, beverage industry, economic concentration, electronic commerce, merger control, non-alcoholic beverage, wholesale trade








C_2021251EN.01000101.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10061 — Coca Cola Hellenic Bottling Company/Heineken/Stockday)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 251/01)
On 30 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10061. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-201/21 P: Appeal brought on 30 March 2021 by Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2021 in Case T-328/17 RENV, Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)
Date: 2021-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, foodstuff, milk product, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021263EN.01000602.xml










5.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/6






Appeal brought on 30 March 2021 by Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2021 in Case T-328/17 RENV, Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — M. J. Dairies (BBQLOUMI)
(Case C-201/21 P)
(2021/C 263/09)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), M. J. Dairies EOOD
By order of 21 May 2021 of the Vice-President, the Court of Justice held that the appeal is dismissed as inadmissible and that Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi shall bear its own costs.