do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 104/05
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Balearic Islands, Community of Madrid, Spain, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2021104EN.01000501.xml










26.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/5






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 104/05)






Member State


Spain




Route concerned


Menorca-Madrid




Reopening date of the PSO routes to community air carriers


1.5.2021




Address where the text and any other information or documentation related to the public service obligations can be obtained.


Ministerio de Transportes, Movilidad y Agenda
Urbana





Dirección General de Aviación Civil




Subdirección General de Transporte Aéreo




Paseo de la Castellana 67




28071 Madrid




ESPAÑA




Tel. +34 915977837
Fax +34 915978643
Email: osp.dgac@mitma.es




The routes subject to public service obligations may be operated on the basis of free competition access as from 1 May 2021. In the event that no air carrier submits a program of services compliant with the public service obligations imposed, access will be restricted from 1 November 2021 to 30 April 2022 to a single air carrier through the corresponding public tender procedure, in accordance with Article 16(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).


(1)  OJ L 293, 31.10.2008, p. 3.
Case C-192/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León (Spain) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Clemente v Comunidad de Castilla y León (Dirección General de la Función Pública)
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: full-time employment, pay scale, promotion, seniority, temporary employment








C_2021263EN.01000502.xml










5.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León (Spain) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Clemente v Comunidad de Castilla y León (Dirección General de la Función Pública)
(Case C-192/21)
(2021/C 263/07)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Clemente

Respondent: Comunidad de Castilla y León (Dirección General de la Función Pública)

Questions referred







1.


Must the concept of ‘comparable permanent worker’ in Clause 4(1) of the framework agreement on fixed-term contracts concluded on 18 March 1999 between the general cross-industry organisations (ETUC, UNICE and CEEP) annexed to Council Directive 1999/70 of 28 June 1999 (1) be interpreted as meaning that, for the purposes of consolidating a personal grade, a period of service as an interim civil servant undertaken by a permanent civil servant before he or she obtained permanent status must be accorded the same treatment as service undertaken by another career civil servant?










2.


Must Clause 4(1) of the framework agreement on fixed-term contracts concluded on 18 March 1999 between the general cross-industry organisations (ETUC, UNICE and CEEP) annexed to Council Directive 1999/70 of 28 June 1999 be interpreted as meaning that both (i) the fact that the period in question has already been taken into account to enable the individual to become a career civil servant and (ii) the design of the civil service career progression arrangements established in national legislation, are objective grounds that justify why a period of service as an interim civil servant undertaken by a permanent civil servant before he or she obtained permanent status should not be taken into account for the purposes of consolidating the individual’s personal grade?






(1)  Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43).
Case C-221/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. and Others
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil code, common transport policy, intra-EU transport, judicial review, national law, rail transport








C_2021242EN.01001101.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/11






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (Czech Republic) lodged on 26 March 2021 — Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. and Others
(Case C-221/21)
(2021/C 242/14)
Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Správa železnic, státní organizace

Defendants: České dráhy a.s.,
PKP CARGO INTERNATIONAL, a.s.,
PDV RAILWAY a.s.,
KŽC Doprava, s.r.o.

Questions referred







1.


Does national regulation in Part Five of Zákon č. 99/1963 Sb., občanský soudní řád (Law 99/1963, Code of Civil Procedure, as amended) (‘the Code of Civil Procedure’ or ‘CCP’) meet the requirements for judicial review of a decision of a regulatory body, pursuant to Article 56(10) of Directive 2012/34/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 establishing a single European railway area (‘Directive 2012/34’)?










2.


If the response to the first question is in the affirmative, can Article 56(10) of Directive 2012/34 be interpreted such that judicial review of a decision of a regulatory body may be concluded by court settlement pursuant to Paragraph 99 CCP?










3.


If the response to the first question is in the affirmative, do the requirements of the establishment of a single national regulatory body for the railway sector, pursuant to Article 55(1) of Directive 2012/34; of the functions of a regulatory body pursuant to Article 56(2), (6), (11), and (12) thereof; and of cooperation of regulatory bodies pursuant to Article 57(2) thereof, admit the possibility that the decisions of a regulatory body on the merits of the case can be substituted by judgments of individual courts of general jurisdiction, which are not bound by the regulatory body’s findings of fact?






(1)  OJ 2012 L 343, p. 32.
Case T-11/20: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — Paravan v EUIPO — paragon (Paragon) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts








C_2021217EN.01004501.xml










7.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/45






Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — Paravan v EUIPO — paragon (Paragon)
(Case T-11/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 217/59)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Paravan GmbH (Pfronstetten-Aichelau, Germany) (represented by: I. Jung and L. Delpy, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA (Delbrück, Germany) (represented by: A. Wulff, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 October 2019 (Case R 28/2019-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Paravan GmbH and paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Paravan GmbH and paragon GmbH & Co. KGaA shall bear their own respective costs and each pay half of the costs of the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Case C-121/20: Order of the President of the Court of 26 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam — Netherlands) — VG v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU visa policy, appeal, right to justice, threat to national security








C_2021289EN.01003101.xml










19.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/31






Order of the President of the Court of 26 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam — Netherlands) — VG v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken
(Case C-121/20) (1)

(2021/C 289/43)
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.
Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021 (Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, drug surveillance, market approval, marketing standard, medicinal product, veterinary medicinal product








C_2021105EN.01001101.xml










26.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 105/11






Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 February 2021 to 28 February 2021
(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC (1) or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC (2))
(2021/C 105/02)
—   Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation











Date of the decision


Name(s) of the medicinal product


INN (International Non-Proprietary Name)


Holder(s) of the marketing authorisation


Member State concerned


Date of notification




25.2.2021


Adjusol tmp sulfa liquide and its associated names


Sulfadiazine and trimethoprim


See Annex


See Annex


26.2.2021




19.2.2021


Angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists (sartans) containing a tetrazole group


candesartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, valsartan


Not applicable


Not applicable


22.2.2021






(1)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2)  OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.




ANNEX
List of the names, pharmaceutical form, strength of the veterinary medicinal product, animal species, route of administration, marketing authorisation holder in the Member States












Member State EU/EEA


Marketing authorisation holder


Name


INN


Strength


Pharmaceutical form


Animal species


Route of administration




France







Virbac




1ere Avenue 2065M LID




06516 Carros Cedex




France






Adjusol TMP Sulfa Liquide


Trimethoprim
Sulfadiazine


16,65  mg/ml
83,35  mg/ml


Oral solution


Cattle (calves), sheep (lambs), pigs, rabbits, poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks)


Oral use




Greece







Virbac




1ere Avenue 2065M LID




06516 Carros Cedex




France






ADJUSOL TMP SULFA πόσιμο διάλυμα (1,665 +8,335 )g/100ml


Trimethoprim
Sulfadiazine


16,65  mg/ml
83,35  mg/ml


Oral solution


Broilers


Oral use




Luxembourg







Virbac




1ere Avenue 2065M LID




06516 Carros Cedex




France






ADJUSOL TMP SULFA LIQUIDE


Trimethoprim
Sulfadiazine


16,65  mg/ml
83,35  mg/ml


Oral solution


Cattle (calves), sheep (lambs), pigs, rabbits, poultry (chickens, turkeys, ducks)


Oral use




Portugal







Virbac




1ere Avenue 2065M LID




06516 Carros Cedex




France






ADJUSOL TMP SULFA LIQUIDO, solução oral para administração na água de bebida para frangos de carne


Trimethoprim
Sulfadiazine


16,65  mg/ml
83,35  mg/ml


Oral solution


Broilers


Oral use
Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/543 of 26 March 2021 amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2021108EN.01005901.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 108/59








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/543
of 26 March 2021
         
amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.












(2)


On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2022.












(3)


Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The second paragraph of Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP is replaced by the following:


                  ‘This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2022.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 26 March 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. P. ZACARIAS
            





(1)  Council Decision 2011/173/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68).
Case T-484/20: Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — SATSE v Commission (Action for annulment — Public health — Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC — List of biological agents known to infect humans — Directive (EU) 2020/739 — Inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 — Inclusion in risk group 3 of biological agents known to infect humans — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: coronavirus disease, epidemic, health risk, occupational health, safety standard, vaccine








C_2021206EN.01002501.xml










31.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 206/25






Order of the General Court of 26 March 2021 — SATSE v Commission
(Case T-484/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Public health - Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC - List of biological agents known to infect humans - Directive (EU) 2020/739 - Inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 - Inclusion in risk group 3 of biological agents known to infect humans - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 206/32)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Sesmero González, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Valero and N. Ruiz García, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Directive (EU) 2020/739 of 3 June 2020 amending Annex III to Directive 2000/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the inclusion of SARS-CoV-2 in the list of biological agents known to infect humans and amending Commission Directive (EU) 2019/1833 (OJ 2020 L 175, p. 11).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene submitted by the Federal Republic of Germany.










3.


Sindicato de Enfermería (SATSE) shall pay the costs of the European Commission, with the exception of the costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.










4.


SATSE, the Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany shall bear their own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 304, 14.9.2020.
Case C-196/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov (Romania) lodged on 26 March 2021 — SR v EW
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil proceedings, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, translation








C_2021263EN.01000601.xml










5.7.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 263/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov (Romania) lodged on 26 March 2021 — SR v EW
(Case C-196/21)
(2021/C 263/08)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Ilfov

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant-applicant: SR

Appellant-defendant: EW

Interveners: FB, CX, IK

Question referred

Where a court decides to summon interveners in civil proceedings, is the ‘applicant’, within the meaning of Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007, (1) the court in the Member State which decides to summon the interveners or the litigant in the proceedings pending before that court?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents), and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 (OJ 2007 L 324, p. 79).
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/538 of 26 March 2021 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2021108EN.01000801.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 108/8








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/538
of 26 March 2021
         
implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.












(2)


On the basis of a review by the Council, the entry for one person should be deleted.












(3)


Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 April 2021.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 March 2021.


For the Council


The President

A. P. ZACARIAS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.




ANNEX
In Regulation (EU) 2016/44, Annex III (List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 6(2)), Part A (Persons), entry 18 (concerning GHWELL, Khalifa) is deleted.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 25 March 2021 2021/C 104/03
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021104EN.01000301.xml










26.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 March 2021
(2021/C 104/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1802 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,75 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4360 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86068 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1935 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1045 




ISK


Iceland króna


149,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1653 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,233 




HUF


Hungarian forint


364,78 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6399 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8865 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,4313 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5548 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4849 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1700 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6948 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5899 




KRW


South Korean won


1 340,88 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6852 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7220 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5748 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 024,39 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8937 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,335 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,0115 




THB


Thai baht


36,746 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6960 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,6616 




INR


Indian rupee


85,7605 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-189/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2021 — R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
Date: 2021-03-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to agriculture, common agricultural policy, market approval, plant health product, terms for aid








C_2021228EN.01002302.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands) lodged on 26 March 2021 — R. en R. v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit
(Case C-189/21)
(2021/C 228/31)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: R. en R.

Defendant: Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit

Question referred

Must management requirement (SMR) 10, as laid down in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, (1) which refers to Article 55, first and second sentences, of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC, (2) be interpreted as meaning that that management requirement also covers the situation in which use is made of a plant protection product which is not authorised in the Member State concerned pursuant to that latter regulation?


(1)  OJ 2013 L 347, p. 549.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1.