do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-282/19: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Halloumi χαλλούμι Vermion grill cheese/grill est/grill kase M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927 — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Bad faith — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001))
Date: 2021-03-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, meat, milk product, processed food product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021217EN.01003801.xml










7.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/38






Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi)
(Case T-282/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Halloumi χαλλούμι Vermion grill cheese/grill est/grill kase M BELAS PREMIUM GREEK DAIRY SINCE 1927 - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 53(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2021/C 217/49)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, S. Baran, Barrister, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Filotas Bellas & Yios AE (Alexandreia Imathias, Greece)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2019 (Case R 2295/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Filotas Bellas & Yios.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.
Case C-603/20 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice) (England & Wales), Family Division — United Kingdom) — SS v MCP (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Area of freedom, security and justice — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 — Article 10 — Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility — Abduction of a child — Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State — Territorial scope — Removal of a child to a third State — Habitual residence acquired in that third State)
Date: 2021-03-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child, illegal restraint, judicial cooperation in civil matters in the EU, jurisdiction, parental responsibility, residence, third country








C_2021189EN.01000501.xml










17.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/5






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice) (England & Wales), Family Division — United Kingdom) — SS v MCP
(Case C-603/20 PPU) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Area of freedom, security and justice - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 - Article 10 - Jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility - Abduction of a child - Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State - Territorial scope - Removal of a child to a third State - Habitual residence acquired in that third State)
(2021/C 189/06)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Family Division

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SS

Defendant: MCP

Operative part of the judgment

Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2116/2004 of 2 December 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that it is not applicable to a situation where a finding is made that a child has, at the time when an application relating to parental responsibility is brought, acquired his or her habitual residence in a third State following abduction to that State. In that situation, the jurisdiction of the court seised will have to be determined in accordance with the applicable international conventions, or, in the absence of any such international convention, in accordance with Article 14 of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 28, 25.1.2021.