do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-149/21: Action brought on 18 March 2021 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA)
Date: 2021-03-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, baby food, chemical product, dietary product, pharmaceutical product, plant health product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2021182EN.01006201.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/62






Action brought on 18 March 2021 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA)
(Case T-149/21)
(2021/C 182/84)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (Gubbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Riva, J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vitae Health Innovation SL (Montmeló, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark VITADHA — International registration designating the European Union No 1 352 764

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2021 in Case R 2719/2019-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision by declaring the signs dissimilar and admitting the opposed application to registration;










—


order the adverse parties to bear the costs of the present proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10179 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft/KiK Textilien und Non-Food) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 103/02
Date: 2021-03-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic commerce, food production, merger control, real estate business, retail trade, textile industry








C_2021103EN.01000201.xml










25.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10179 — Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft/KiK Textilien und Non-Food)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 103/02)
On 18 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10179. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-895/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach — Poland) — A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Indirect taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Intra-Community acquisition of goods — Deduction of input tax payable on such an acquisition — Procedural requirements — Substantive requirements — Period within which the tax declaration must be submitted — Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)
Date: 2021-03-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, acquisition of property, basis of tax assessment, goods and services, principle of proportionality, tax relief








C_2021182EN.01001601.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/16






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach — Poland) — A. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
(Case C-895/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Indirect taxation - VAT - Directive 2006/112/EC - Intra-Community acquisition of goods - Deduction of input tax payable on such an acquisition - Procedural requirements - Substantive requirements - Period within which the tax declaration must be submitted - Principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality)
(2021/C 182/22)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gliwicach

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: A.

Defendant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej

Other party: Rzecznik Małych i Średnich Przedsiębiorców

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 167 and 178 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which makes the exercise of the right to deduct value added tax (VAT) payable on an intra-Community acquisition in the same accounting period as that in which the VAT is due subject to entry of the VAT due in the tax declaration submitted within a three-month period following the end of the month in which the tax liability arose in relation to the goods acquired.


(1)  OJ C 54, 17.2.2020.