do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-405/14: Order of the General Court of 16 March 2021 — Yavorskaya v Council and Others
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Cyprus, EU institution, bank deposit, contractual liability, equal treatment, indemnification, ownership, seizure of goods








C_2021182EN.01006602.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/66






Order of the General Court of 16 March 2021 — Yavorskaya v Council and Others
(Case T-405/14) (1)

(2021/C 182/90)
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 261, 11.8.2014.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 March 2021 2021/C 89/04
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021089EN.01000401.xml










16.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 March 2021
(2021/C 89/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1920 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,17 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85670 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1850 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1084 




ISK


Iceland króna


153,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,0988 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,193 




HUF


Hungarian forint


367,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5914 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8845 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,9852 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5419 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4874 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2553 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6588 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6040 




KRW


South Korean won


1 351,97 




ZAR


South African rand


17,7316 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7508 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5798 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 165,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9021 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,868 




RUB


Russian rouble


87,1471 




THB


Thai baht


36,630 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6896 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,6610 




INR


Indian rupee


86,4925 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-596/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2021 — European Commission v Hungary, Republic of Poland (Appeal — Article 107(1) TFEU — State aid — Hungarian tax on turnover linked to advertisements — Information used to determine the reference system — Progressivity of tax rates — Transitional measure for the partial deductibility of losses carried forward — Existence of a selective advantage — Burden of proof)
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, VAT, advertising, control of State aid, loss, proof, tax relief








C_2021182EN.01001201.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/12






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2021 — European Commission v Hungary, Republic of Poland
(Case C-596/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 107(1) TFEU - State aid - Hungarian tax on turnover linked to advertisements - Information used to determine the reference system - Progressivity of tax rates - Transitional measure for the partial deductibility of losses carried forward - Existence of a selective advantage - Burden of proof)
(2021/C 182/16)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, P.-J. Loewenthal and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents), Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those incurred by the Republic of Poland.






(1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10161 — The Goldman Sachs Group/Warburg Pincus/Good Host Spaces) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 96/05
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: India, banking, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services, securities, student residence








C_2021096EN.01000501.xml










22.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10161 — The Goldman Sachs Group/Warburg Pincus/Good Host Spaces)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 96/05)
On 16 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10161. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-168/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 16 March 2021 — Procureur général près la cour d’appel d’Angers v KL
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, enforcement of ruling, offence








C_2021228EN.01002001.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 16 March 2021 — Procureur général près la cour d’appel d’Angers v KL
(Case C-168/21)
(2021/C 228/26)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Procureur général près la cour d’appel d’Angers

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: KL

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 2(4) and 4(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584 (1) be interpreted as meaning that the condition of double criminality is met in a situation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in which surrender is sought for acts which, in the issuing State, have been categorised as devastation and looting and which consist of acts of devastation and looting such as to cause a breach of the public peace when, in the executing State, there are criminal offences of theft accompanied by damage or offences of causing destruction or damage that do not require that element of a breach of the public peace?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Articles 2(4) and 4(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584 be interpreted as meaning that the courts in the executing State may refuse to execute a European arrest warrant issued for the enforcement of a sentence where they find that the judicial authorities in the issuing State imposed that sentence on the person concerned for the commission of a single offence covering various acts and where only some of those acts constitute a criminal offence in the executing State? Does a distinction need to be made depending on whether or not the trial court in the issuing State considered those various acts to be divisible or indivisible?










3.


Does Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights require the judicial authorities in the executing Member State to refuse to execute a European arrest warrant where, first, that warrant was issued in order to enforce a single sentence imposed for a single offence and, second, where, given that some of the acts for which that sentence was imposed do not constitute an offence under the law of the executing Member State, a surrender can only be ordered in relation to some of those acts?






(1)  Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10194 — CDP Venture Capital/Generali Welion/JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 121/04
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, elderly person, health policy, insurance, investment, investment company, merger control, provision of services, tourism








C_2021121EN.01004601.xml










9.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 121/46






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10194 — CDP Venture Capital/Generali Welion/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 121/04)
On 16 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10194. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Information notice on marking specifications for single-use plastic products 2021/C 89/05
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission
Subjects: consumer information, household article, labelling, non-durable goods, plastics, pollution control measures, technical specification, tobacco industry, toiletries, waste management








C_2021089EN.01000501.xml










16.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 89/5






Information notice on marking specifications for single-use plastic products
(2021/C 89/05)
The Commission would like to inform the relevant operators and Member States’ authorities that in order to support the implementation of the obligation under Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) regarding the marking of certain single-use plastic products, as of 3 July 2021, and as required under Article 7(2) of that Directive, the Commission has adopted an Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 (2) laying down rules on harmonised marking specifications on single-use plastic products listed in Part D of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/904 and related the corrigenda.
The marking concerns single-use plastic products listed in part D of the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/904. These products are:






(1)


Sanitary towels (pads), tampons and tampon applicators;










(2)


Wet wipes, i.e. pre-wetted personal care and domestic wipes;










(3)


Tobacco products with filters and filters marketed for use in combination with tobacco products;










(4)


Cups for beverages.





Pictograms in vectorised format

With reference to the harmonised marking requirements in the Annex to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2151 considering the corrigenda, please find below the weblink to the vectorised pictograms, in the order they appear in the Annexes I to IV of the Implementing Regulation, in all official languages of EU Member States (as courtesy translation also in Gaelic, though not included in the Implementing Regulation).
https://ec.europa.eu/environment/topics/plastics/single-use-plastics/sups-marking-specifications_en


(1)  OJ L 155, 12.6.2019, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 428, 18.12.2020, p. 57.
Case C-562/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, Hungary (Appeal — Article 107(1) TFEU — State aid — Polish tax on the retail sector — Article 108(2) TFEU — Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Information used to determine the reference system — Progressivity of rates — Existence of a selective advantage — Burden of proof)
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, national tax, proof, retail trade, turnover








C_2021182EN.01000901.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/9






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 March 2021 — European Commission v Republic of Poland, Hungary
(Case C-562/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 107(1) TFEU - State aid - Polish tax on the retail sector - Article 108(2) TFEU - Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Information used to determine the reference system - Progressivity of rates - Existence of a selective advantage - Burden of proof)
(2021/C 182/11)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann, P.-J. Loewenthal and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz and M. Szydło, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;










3.


Orders Hungary to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 328, 30.9.2019.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/467 of 16 March 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the product specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Volailles d’Ancenis’ (PGI)
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: France, Loire Region, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, designation of origin, fresh meat, labelling, poultry, poultrymeat, product designation








L_2021096EN.01000501.xml










19.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 96/5








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/467
of 16 March 2021
         
approving non-minor amendments to the product specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Volailles d’Ancenis’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Volailles d’Ancenis’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the product specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Volailles d’Ancenis’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 of 12 June 1996 on the registration of geographical indications and designations of origin under the procedure laid down in Article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 (OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1).

(3)  
            OJ C 395, 20.11.2020, p. 7.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10183 — AustralianSuper/CPPIB/Transurban/Transurban Chesapeake) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 96/04
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, pension fund, toll








C_2021096EN.01000401.xml










22.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 96/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10183 — AustralianSuper/CPPIB/Transurban/Transurban Chesapeake)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 96/04)
On 16 March 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10183. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/484 of 16 March 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Burrata di Andria’ (PGI)
Date: 2021-03-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Apulia, Italy, cows’ milk cheese, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2021100EN.01000101.xml










23.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 100/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/484
of 16 March 2021
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Burrata di Andria’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Burrata di Andria’, registered under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2103 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation. (3).












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Burrata di Andria’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 March 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2103 of 21 November 2016 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Burrata di Andria (PGI)] (OJ L 327, 2.12.2016, p. 16).

(3)  
            OJ C 408, 27.11.2020, p. 9.