do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-154/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 9 March 2021 — RW v Österreichische Post AG
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, data protection, international organisation, natural person, personal data, protection of privacy, third country








C_2021217EN.01002101.xml










7.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 217/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 9 March 2021 — RW v Österreichische Post AG
(Case C-154/21)
(2021/C 217/32)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RW

Defendant: Österreichische Post AG

Question referred

Is Article 15(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the right of access is limited to information concerning categories of recipient where specific recipients have not yet been determined in the case of planned disclosures, but that right must necessarily also cover recipients of those disclosures in cases where data has already been disclosed?


(1)  Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 8 March 2021 2021/C 80/05
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021080EN.01001601.xml










9.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/16






Euro exchange rates (1)

8 March 2021
(2021/C 80/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1866 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,90 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85728 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1803 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1087 




ISK


Iceland króna


152,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1785 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,417 




HUF


Hungarian forint


367,19 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,6002 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8852 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,1062 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5499 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5035 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2183 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6673 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5996 




KRW


South Korean won


1 351,68 




ZAR


South African rand


18,3582 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7446 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5780 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 039,58 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8740 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,803 




RUB


Russian rouble


88,7408 




THB


Thai baht


36,535 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,8228 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,5759 




INR


Indian rupee


87,0475 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-580/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt — Germany) — RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘working time’ — Period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system — Professional firefighters — Directive 89/391/EEC — Articles 5 and 6 — Psychosocial risks — Obligation to prevent)
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, fire protection, health risk, leisure, requisitioning of workers, residence, working time








C_2021182EN.01001101.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/11






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt — Germany) — RJ v Stadt Offenbach am Main
(Case C-580/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 2 - Concept of ‘working time’ - Period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system - Professional firefighters - Directive 89/391/EEC - Articles 5 and 6 - Psychosocial risks - Obligation to prevent)
(2021/C 182/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: RJ

Defendant: Stadt Offenbach am Main

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that a period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system, during which a worker must be able to reach the town boundary of his or her workplace within a 20 minute response time, in uniform with the service vehicle made available to him or her by his or her employer, using traffic regulations privileges and rights of priority attached to that vehicle, constitutes, in its entirety, ‘working time’, within the meaning of that provision, solely if it follows from an overall assessment of all the circumstances of the case, in particular the consequences of such a response time and, where appropriate, the average frequency of interventions during that period, that the constraints imposed on that worker during that period are of such a nature as to constrain objectively and very significantly the ability that he or she has to freely manage, during the same period, the time during which his or her professional services are not required and to devote that time to his or her own interests.


(1)  OJ C 372, 4.11.2019.
Case C-344/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — D.J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 2 — Concept of ‘working time’ — Stand-by time according to a stand-by system — Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas — Directive 89/391/EEC — Articles 5 and 6 — Psychosocial risks — Obligation to prevent)
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, broadcasting, leisure, programmes industry, secondary residence, television, working time








C_2021182EN.01000301.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/3






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — D.J. v Radiotelevizija Slovenija
(Case C-344/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 2 - Concept of ‘working time’ - Stand-by time according to a stand-by system - Specific work maintaining television transmitters situated far away from residential areas - Directive 89/391/EEC - Articles 5 and 6 - Psychosocial risks - Obligation to prevent)
(2021/C 182/03)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: D.J.

Defendant: Radiotelevizija Slovenija

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that a period of stand-by time according to a stand-by system, during which the worker is required only to be contactable by telephone and able to return to his or her workplace, if necessary, within a time limit of one hour, while being able to stay in service accommodation made available to him or her by his or her employer at that workplace, without being required to remain there, does not constitute, in its entirety, working time within the meaning of that provision, unless an overall assessment of all the facts of the case, including the consequences of that time limit and, if appropriate, the average frequency of activity during that period, establishes that the constraints imposed on that worker during that period are such as to affect, objectively and very significantly, the latter’s ability freely to manage, during the same period, the time during which his or her professional services are not required and to devote that time to his or her own interests. The limited nature of the opportunities to pursue leisure activities within the immediate vicinity of the place concerned is irrelevant for the purposes of that assessment.


(1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.
Case C-392/19: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Copyright and related rights in the information society — Directive 2001/29/EC — Article 3(1) — Concept of ‘communication to the public’ — Embedding, in a third party’s website, of a copyright-protected work by means of the process of framing — Work freely accessible with the authorisation of the copyright holder on the licensee’s website — Clause in the exploitation agreement requiring the licensee to introduce effective technological measures against framing — Lawfulness — Fundamental rights — Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Internet site, copyright








C_2021182EN.01000501.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/5






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — VG Bild-Kunst v Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz
(Case C-392/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 3(1) - Concept of ‘communication to the public’ - Embedding, in a third party’s website, of a copyright-protected work by means of the process of framing - Work freely accessible with the authorisation of the copyright holder on the licensee’s website - Clause in the exploitation agreement requiring the licensee to introduce effective technological measures against framing - Lawfulness - Fundamental rights - Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)
(2021/C 182/06)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: VG Bild-Kunst

Respondent: Stiftung Preußischer Kulturbesitz

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that the embedding, by means of the technique of framing, in a third party website page, of works that are protected by copyright and that are freely accessible to the public with the authorisation of the copyright holder on another website, where that embedding circumvents measures adopted or imposed by that copyright holder to provide protection from framing, constitutes a communication to the public within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2021/C 80 I/03
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, Irish Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








CI2021080EN.01000301.xml










9.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 80/3






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2021/C 80 I/03)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


24.12.2020




Duration


24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020




Member State


Belgium




Stock or Group of stocks


COD/07A.




Species


Cod (Gadus Morhua)




Zone


7a




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


39/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2021/C 80 I/02
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, Irish Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








CI2021080EN.01000201.xml










9.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 80/2






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2021/C 80 I/02)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


24.12.2020




Duration


24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020




Member State


Belgium




Stock or Group of stocks


PLE/07A.




Species


Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa)




Zone


7a




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


36/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2021/C 80 I/01
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, Irish Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








CI2021080EN.01000101.xml










9.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 80/1






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2021/C 80 I/01)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


24.12.2020




Duration


24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020




Member State


Belgium




Stock or Group of stocks


SOL/07A.




Species


Common sole (Solea solea)




Zone


7a




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


35/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2021/C 80 I/04
Date: 2021-03-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, EU waters, Irish Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








CI2021080EN.01000401.xml










9.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 80/4






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2021/C 80 I/04)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


24.12.2020




Duration


24.12.2020 - 31.12.2020




Member State


Belgium




Stock or Group of stocks


WHG/07A.




Species


Whiting (Merlangius merlangus)




Zone


7a




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


38/TQ123






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.