do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-841/19: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 41 de Madrid — Spain) — JL v Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Fogasa) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 2006/54/EC — Articles 2(1) and 4 — Equal pay for male and female workers — Framework agreement on part-time work — Clause 4 — Part-time workers, primarily female — National guarantee institution for the payment of outstanding claims of relevant workers against their insolvent employers — Ceiling on the payment of those claims — Amount of the ceiling reduced for part-time workers in accordance with the hours worked by the latter in relation to the hours worked by full-time workers — Principle of pro rata temporis)
Date: 2021-03-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: employer, equal pay, equal treatment, financial solvency, full-time employment, gender equality, part-time employment, pay, severance pay








C_2021228EN.01001001.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/10






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 March 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 41 de Madrid — Spain) — JL v Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Fogasa)
(Case C-841/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2006/54/EC - Articles 2(1) and 4 - Equal pay for male and female workers - Framework agreement on part-time work - Clause 4 - Part-time workers, primarily female - National guarantee institution for the payment of outstanding claims of relevant workers against their insolvent employers - Ceiling on the payment of those claims - Amount of the ceiling reduced for part-time workers in accordance with the hours worked by the latter in relation to the hours worked by full-time workers - Principle of pro rata temporis)
(2021/C 228/12)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 41 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: JL

Defendant: Fondo de Garantía Salarial (Fogasa)

Operative part of the order

Articles 2(1) and 4 of Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, as regards the payment by the liable national institution of the wages and compensation that have not been paid to workers due to the insolvency of their employer, provides for a ceiling to that payment for full-time workers which, in the case of part-time workers, is reduced pro rata temporis according to the hours worked by those workers in relation to those worked by full-time workers.


(1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries 2021/C 74 I/02
Date: 2021-03-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Atlantic Ocean, EU Member State, catch by species, catch quota, fishing area, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








CI2021074EN.01000201.xml










3.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CI 74/2






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2021/C 74 I/02)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


10.2.2021 at 24.00 UTC




Duration


10.2.2021 at 24.00 UTC - 30.6.2021




Member State


European Union (All Member States)




Stock or Group of stocks


RED/N3M.




Species


Redfishes (Sebastes spp.)




Zone


NAFO 3M




Type(s) of fishing vessels


---




Reference number


02/TQ92






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Update of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.) 2021/C 74/04
Date: 2021-03-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: France, Schengen Agreement, border control, external border of the EU, foreign national, identity document, residence permit








C_2021074EN.01000501.xml










3.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 74/5






Update of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1)

(2021/C 74/04)
The publication of the list of national services responsible for border controls as referred to in Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (2) is based on the information communicated by the Member States to the Commission in conformity with Article 39 of the Schengen Borders Code.
In addition to the publication in the Official Journal, a regular update is available on the website of the Directorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs.
FRANCE

Replacement of the information published in OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.

The national service responsible for border controls: Direction centrale de la police aux frontières, Direction générale des douanes et droits indirects, Gendarmerie de l’air;

List of previous publications







 



OJ C 247, 13.10.2006, p. 17.










 



OJ C 77, 5.4.2007, p. 11.










 



OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 1.










 



OJ C 164, 18.7.2007, p. 45.










 



OJ C 153, 6.7.2007, p. 21.










 



OJ C 331, 31.12.2008, p. 15.










 



OJ C 87, 1.4.2010, p. 15.










 



OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 2.










 



OJ C 98, 5.4.2013, p. 2.










 



OJ C 256, 5.9.2013, p. 14.










 



OJ C 360, 10.12.2013, p. 17.










 



OJ C 218, 7.7.2017, p. 19.










 



OJ C 431, 15.12.2017, p. 8.










 



OJ C 345, 27.9.2018, p. 4.










 



OJ C 375, 17.10.2018, p. 5.






(1)  See the list of previous publications at the end of this update.

(2)  OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1.
Case T-599/19: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — EM v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Psychological harassment — Request for assistance — Rejection of the request — Retirement — Duty to provide assistance — Principle of sound administration — Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
Date: 2021-03-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, harassment at work, indemnification, misuse of a right, pension scheme, psychological harassment, retirement conditions, servant (EU)








C_2021148EN.01001601.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/16






Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — EM v Parliament
(Case T-599/19) (1)

(Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Psychological harassment - Request for assistance - Rejection of the request - Retirement - Duty to provide assistance - Principle of sound administration - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff)
(2021/C 148/21)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: EM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Boytha, C. González Argüelles and T. Lazian, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 31 October 2018 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance, as confirmed by the decision of 24 May 2019 rejecting his complaint and, secondly, compensation for the material and non-material harm which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.
Case T-48/20: Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation v EUIPO (Heartfulness) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Heartfulness — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptiveness — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2021-03-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, consultancy, denominational education, education, registered trade mark, religion, teaching materials, trade-mark law








C_2021148EN.01001602.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/16






Judgment of the General Court of 3 March 2021 — Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation v EUIPO (Heartfulness)
(Case T-48/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Heartfulness - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 148/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation (Manapakkam, India) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2019 (Case R 1266/2019-4), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark Heartfulness.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sahaj Marg Spirituality Foundation to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 87, 16.3.2020.