do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-122/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 26 February 2021 — Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited v Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, child protection, health risk, market approval, product safety, proof








C_2021182EN.01003902.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/39






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 26 February 2021 — Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited v Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba

(Case C-122/21)
(2021/C 182/54)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Get Fresh Cosmetics Limited

Respondent: Valstybinė vartotojų teisių apsaugos tarnyba

Questions referred







1.


Should Article 1(2) of Council Directive 87/357/EEC (1) of 25 June 1987 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States concerning products which, appearing to be other than they are, endanger the health or safety of consumers be interpreted as defining the products referred to in paragraph 1 of that article as being those which, although not foodstuffs, possess a form, odour, colour, appearance, packaging, labelling, volume or size, such that it is likely that consumers, especially children, will confuse them with foodstuffs and in consequence place them in their mouths, or suck or ingest them, which could be dangerous as it is demonstrated by objective and substantiated data that this may cause, for example, suffocation, poisoning, or the perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract?










2.


If the first question is answered in the affirmative, should the burden of proving this be borne by the competent supervisory authority of the Member State?






(1)  OJ 1987 L 192, p. 49.
Case C-127/21 P: Appeal brought on 26 February 2021 by American Airlines, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-430/18, American Airlines v Commission
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, economic concentration, merger control








C_2021163EN.01002101.xml










3.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/21






Appeal brought on 26 February 2021 by American Airlines, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 16 December 2020 in Case T-430/18, American Airlines v Commission
(Case C-127/21 P)
(2021/C 163/26)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: American Airlines, Inc. (represented by: J.-P. Poitras, avocat, J. Ruiz Calzado, abogado, J. Wileur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside and annul the judgment under appeal;










—


annul Commission Decision C(2017) 2788 final of 30 April 2018;










—


in the alternative, if deemed necessary, remand the case to the General Court for reconsideration in accordance with the Court’s judgment;










—


order the Commission to bear its own costs and pay the appellant’s costs, both for these proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court;










—


take any other measures that the Court considers appropriate.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the appellant relies on a single plea in law that the General Court committed an error of law in accepting the Commission’s flawed legal interpretation that the ‘appropriate use’ test in Clause 1.10 of the American-US Airways merger commitments (‘Commitments’) means only ‘absence of misuse’ and thereby the judgment incorrectly upheld Commission Decision C(2017) 2788 final of 30 April 2018 granting Grandfathering rights to Delta Airlines (Case M.6607 — US Airways/American Airlines).
The plea has three limbs:






1.


In the first limb, the appellant focuses on the correct legal approach to interpreting the ‘appropriate use’ test for the award of Grandfathering rights under Clause 1.10 of the Commitments and demonstrates that the General Court erred in law in its interpretative approach.










2.


In the second limb, the appellant demonstrates that General Court further erred in law by accepting the Commission’s analysis that ‘appropriate use’ means only ‘absence of misuse’ thereby incorrectly accepting Delta’s failure to operate 470 remedy slots.










3.


In the third limb, the appellant explains the additional legal errors of the judgment in interpreting Clause 1.9 of the Commitments, specifically the wording ‘in accordance with the bid’ based on a flawed legal analysis of the Form RM.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 25 February 2021 2021/C 66/13
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021066EN.01004901.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/49






Euro exchange rates (1)

25 February 2021
(2021/C 66/13)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2225 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,73 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4363 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86408 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0668 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1076 




ISK


Iceland króna


153,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2275 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,110 




HUF


Hungarian forint


360,18 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5122 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8748 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,8344 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5317 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5257 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4793 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6409 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6120 




KRW


South Korean won


1 359,14 




ZAR


South African rand


18,1101 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8898 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5895 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 352,10 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9383 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,492 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,3519 




THB


Thai baht


36,858 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6663 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,3424 




INR


Indian rupee


88,7940 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 3 2021/C 70/05
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts




C_2021070EN.01001901.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/19






Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 3
(2021/C 70/05)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2020


Amending budget No 3


New amount





2




COMMISSION SUBSIDY





2 0


COMMISSION SUBSIDY


51 527 150 


–2 286 346 


49 240 804 




 



Title 2 — Total




51 527 150 




–2 286 346 




49 240 804 






9




MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





9 0


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.







 



GRAND TOTAL




51 527 150 




–2 286 346 




49 240 804 






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2020


Amending budget No 3


New amount





1




STAFF EXPENDITURE





1 1


REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES


37 697 000 


– 340 000 


37 357 000 




1 2


PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE


2 391 900 


–23 500 


2 368 400 




 



Title 1 — Total




40 088 900 




– 363 500 




39 725 400 






2




INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


BUILDING EXPENDITURE


5 465 500 


–17 346 


5 448 154 




2 2


ICT EXPENDITURE


2 155 000 


–15 000 


2 140 000 




2 3


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


248 000 


–42 000 


206 000 




 



Title 2 — Total




7 868 500 




–74 346 




7 794 154 






3




PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE





3 1


PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE


3 569 750 


–1 848 500 


1 721 250 




 



Title 3 — Total




3 569 750 




–1 848 500 




1 721 250 







 



GRAND TOTAL




51 527 150 




–2 286 346 




49 240 804
Case C-126/21: Action brought on 26 February 2021 — European Commission v Ireland
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: alternative sentence, criminal law, enforcement of ruling, infringement of EU law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, judicial proceedings, national law, restriction of liberty








C_2021148EN.01001102.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/11






Action brought on 26 February 2021 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-126/21)
(2021/C 148/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Tomkin, and S. Grünheid, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:







—


declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 27 of that Framework Decision;










—


order Ireland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

According to Article 27 of Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, Member States were to take the necessary measures to comply with the provisions of the Framework Decision by 1 December 2012 and to notify the Commission of such measures.
The Commission considers that Ireland has infringed its obligations under Article 27 of the Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Framework Decision or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission.


(1)  OJ 2009, L 294, p. 20.
Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus 2021/C 66/11
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, natural person








C_2021066EN.01004601.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/46






Notice for the attention of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus
(2021/C 66/11)
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities designated in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/353 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/339 (4), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus.
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons and entities designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should continue to apply to those persons and entities. The grounds for designations of those persons and entities appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.
The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).
The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council before 30 November 2021, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Article 8a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, of the list of designated persons and entities.


(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 68, 26.2.2021, p. 189


(3)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 68, 26.2.2021, p. 29.
Case C-606/20: Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EZ v Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana, Sociedad Unipersonal
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carrier, electronic device, liability, personal effects








C_2021228EN.01002702.xml










14.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 228/27






Order of the President of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — EZ v Iberia Lineas Aereas de Espana, Sociedad Unipersonal
(Case C-606/20) (1)

(2021/C 228/37)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.
Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2020 (Official Journal of the European Union C 107 of 31 March 2020) 2021/C 70/06
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Eurofound
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts








C_2021070EN.01002201.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/22






Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2020

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 107 of 31 March 2020
)

(2021/C 70/06)
On page 7, chapter 1 0, Title 1 — Total, Grand total:
for:










‘Title
Chapter


Heading


Financial year 2020


Financial year 2019


Financial year 2018





1




EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY



 


 


 




1 0


EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY


21 779 000 


20 779 000 


20 371 000 




 



Title 1 — Total




21 779 000 




20 779 000 




20 371 000 





[…]


[…]


 


 


 




 



GRAND TOTAL




21 979 000 




21 921 536 




20 763 522 ’





read:










‘Title
Chapter


Heading


Financial year 2020


Financial year 2019


Financial year 2018





1




EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY



 


 


 




1 0


EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY


21 195 000 


20 779 000 


20 371 000 




 



Title 1 — Total




21 195 000 




20 779 000 




20 371 000 





[…]


[…]


 


 


 




 



GRAND TOTAL




21 395 000 




21 921 536 




20 763 522 ’
Case C-125/21: Action brought on 26 February 2021 — European Commission v Ireland
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: carrying out of sentence, criminal procedure, imprisonment, infringement of EU law, judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the EU, ruling








C_2021148EN.01001101.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/11






Action brought on 26 February 2021 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-125/21)
(2021/C 148/14)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Tomkin, and S. Grünheid, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland

The applicant claims that the Court should:







—


declare that by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union (1) or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 29(1) and (2) of that Framework Decision;










—


order Ireland to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

According to Articles 29(1) and (2) of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, Member States were to take the measures necessary to comply with the provisions of this Framework Decision by 5 December 2011 and to notify such measures to the Commission.
The Commission considers that Ireland has infringed its obligations under Article 29(1) and (2) of the Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Framework Decision or, in any event, by failing to notify such provisions to the Commission.


(1)  OJ 2008, L 327, p. 27.
Case C-120/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 26 February 2021 — LB v TO
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrangement of working time, labour law, paid leave, working conditions








C_2021182EN.01003901.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/39






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 26 February 2021 — LB v TO
(Case C-120/21)
(2021/C 182/53)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: LB

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: TO

Question referred

Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) and Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union preclude the application of national legislation such as Paragraph 194(1), in conjunction with Paragraph 195, of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (German Civil Code; ‘the BGB’), under which the entitlement to paid annual leave is subject to a standard limitation period of three years, which starts to run at the end of the leave year under the conditions set out in Paragraph 199(1) of the BGB, if the employer has not actually enabled a worker to exercise his or her leave entitlement by accordingly informing him or her of the leave and inviting him or her to take that leave?


(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.
Case T-126/21: Action brought on 26 February 2021 — Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Russia, anti-dumping duty, chemical salt, import (EU), originating product








C_2021148EN.01002402.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/24






Action brought on 26 February 2021 — Nevinnomysskiy Azot and NAK ‘Azot’ v Commission
(Case T-126/21)
(2021/C 148/34)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot (Nevinnomyssk, Russia) and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK ‘Azot’ (Novomoskovsk, Russia) (represented by: P. Vander Schueren and E. Gergondet, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/2100 of 15 December 2020, (1) as far as it applies to the applicants;










—


order the defendant to to pay the costs incurred by the applicants in relation to these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on a single plea in law, alleging that the defendant did not receive an expiry review request containing ‘sufficient evidence’ and therefore committed manifest errors of assessment, acted in breach of Articles 11(2), 11(5) and 5(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036, (2) and violated its duty to examine carefully and impartially all the relevant aspects of the individual case when it initiated the expiry review.


(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/2100 of 15 December 2020 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ammonium nitrate originating in Russia following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of the Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2020 L 425, p. 21).

(2)  Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21).
Case C-737/19: Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil — France) — Bank of China Limited v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, VAT, banking, branch, financial services, head office, provision of services, tax relief, taxpayer, third country








C_2021182EN.01004902.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/49






Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 26 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil — France) — Bank of China Limited v Ministre de l’Action and des Comptes publics
(Case C-737/19) (1)

(2021/C 182/65)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 413, 9.12.2019.
Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2 (Official Journal of the European Union C 11 of 11 January 2021) 2021/C 70/07
Date: 2021-02-26
Institutions: Europol
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts




C_2021070EN.01002301.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 70/23






Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 2

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 11 of 11 January 2021
)

(2021/C 70/07)
On page 11, chapters 3 6, 3 7, Title 3 — Total, Grand total:
for:










‘Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2020


Amending Budget No 2


New amount






[…]


[…]


 


 


 




3 6


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO SUBSIDIES AND GRANTS


p.m.


 


p.m.




3 7


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO RESERARCH AND DEVELOMENT PROJECT


1 030 000 


 


1 030 000 




[…]


[…]


 


 


 




 



Title 3 — Total




53 054 500 




-3 195 000 




49 859 500 







 



GRAND TOTAL




158 067 123 




-5 000 000 




153 067 123 ’





read:










‘Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2020


Amending Budget No 2


New amount






[…]


[…]


 


 


 




3 6


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO SUBSIDIES AND GRANTS


p.m.


3 380 000 


3 380 000 




3 7


OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE RELATED TO RESERARCH AND DEVELOMENT PROJECT


1 030 000 


2 171 950 


3 201 950 




[…]


[…]


 


 


 




 



Title 3 — Total




53 054 500 




2 356 950 




55 411 450 







 



GRAND TOTAL




158 067 123 




551 950 




158 619 073 ’