do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-587/19: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Response lodged out of time — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, agricultural product, distributor, export, horticulture, import, packaging, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2021163EN.01003101.xml










3.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/31






Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién)
(Case T-587/19) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Response lodged out of time - Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 163/41)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Frutas Tono, SL (Benifairó de la Valldigna, Spain) (represented by: A. Cañizares Doménech, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Agrocazalla, SL (Lorca, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 (Case R 171/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Agrocazalla and Frutas Tono.

Operative part of the order







1.


Agrocazalla, SL is not granted leave to participate in the proceedings.










2.


Agrocazalla shall bear its own costs.










3.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










4.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10150 — Ares/OTPP/TricorBraun) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 71/05
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, packaging, pension scheme








C_2021071EN.01005801.xml










1.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/58






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10150 — Ares/OTPP/TricorBraun)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 71/05)
On 23 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10150. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10140 — EFMS/VFMF/FocusVision/Confirmit/Dapresy) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 71/07
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, investment company, market research, merger control, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, software








C_2021071EN.01006001.xml










1.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/60






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10140 — EFMS/VFMF/FocusVision/Confirmit/Dapresy)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 71/07)
On 23 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10140. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-655/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA (Application for interim relief — REACH — Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate — Compliance check of registrations — Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: animal experimentation, chemical product, product safety, rights of the defence, toxic substance








C_2021163EN.01003501.xml










3.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/35






Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA
(Case T-655/20 R)
(Application for interim relief - REACH - Substance 2-ethylhexyl salicylate - Compliance check of registrations - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency)
(2021/C 163/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere, N. Knight and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures, first, to suspend implementation of Decision A 010 2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the applicant’s registration dossier for 2-ethylhexyl salicylate and, second, to order the extension of the prescribed period to communicate the results of the tests for the duration of the suspension.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 22 February 2021 2021/C 63/06
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021063EN.01000801.xml










23.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/8






Euro exchange rates (1)

22 February 2021
(2021/C 63/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2133 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,00 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4365 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86530 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0315 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0888 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3185 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,954 




HUF


Hungarian forint


359,09 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4982 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8758 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,5684 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5392 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5328 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4070 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6583 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6058 




KRW


South Korean won


1 350,83 




ZAR


South African rand


18,0732 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8447 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5714 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 197,50 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9048 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,112 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,9800 




THB


Thai baht


36,448 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,6843 




MXN


Mexican peso


25,2189 




INR


Indian rupee


87,9720 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10155 — OTPP/SL GIO II/SGI) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 71/06
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, gas supply, health insurance, investment company, life assurance, merger control, pension scheme








C_2021071EN.01005901.xml










1.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 71/59






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10155 — OTPP/SL GIO II/SGI)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 71/06)
On 23 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10155. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-656/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA (Application for interim relief — REACH — Homosalate substance — Compliance check of registrations — Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing — Application for interim measures — No urgency)
Date: 2021-02-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: animal experimentation, chemical product, product safety, toxic substance








C_2021148EN.01001801.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/18






Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Symrise v ECHA
(Case T-656/20 R)
(Application for interim relief - REACH - Homosalate substance - Compliance check of registrations - Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing - Application for interim measures - No urgency)
(2021/C 148/25)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Symrise AG (Holzminden, Germany) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: W. Broere, N. Knight and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for the grant of interim measures seeking, first, suspension of the implementation of Decision A-009-2018 of the Board of Appeal of ECHA of 18 August 2020, relating to the applicant’s registration dossier for homosalate and, second, extension of the prescribed period to communicate the results of the tests for the duration of the suspension.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.