do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-105/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 February 2021 — Criminal proceedings against IR
Date: 2021-02-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: arrest, equal treatment, freedom of movement, primacy of EU law, right to information, right to justice








C_2021163EN.01001601.xml










3.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 163/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 22 February 2021 — Criminal proceedings against IR
(Case C-105/21)
(2021/C 163/22)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad

Party to the main proceedings

IR

Questions referred







1.


Would it be in conformity with Article 6 of the Charter — read in conjunction with Article 5(4), (2) and (1)(c) ECHR — and with Article 47 of the Charter, the right to freedom of movement, the principle of equality and the principle of mutual trust if the issuing judicial authority, according to Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584, were to make no effort whatsoever to inform the requested person, while he or she is in the territory of the executing Member State, of the factual and legal bases for his or her arrest and of the right to challenge the arrest warrant?










2.


If so: Does the principle of the primacy of EU law over national law require the issuing judicial authority not to provide that information and, moreover, if the requested person requests the withdrawal of the national arrest warrant despite that failure to provide information, does that principle require the issuing judicial authority to assess that request on the merits only after the requested person has been surrendered?










3.


What legal measures of EU law are the appropriate basis for such provision of information?
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 19 February 2021 2021/C 61/05
Date: 2021-02-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021061EN.01000501.xml










22.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

19 February 2021
(2021/C 61/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2139 




JPY


Japanese yen


127,81 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4368 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86508 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0330 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0851 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2095 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,849 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4830 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8758 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,4470 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5445 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5307 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4121 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6642 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6059 




KRW


South Korean won


1 339,59 




ZAR


South African rand


17,7391 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8318 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5780 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 094,81 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9048 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,846 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,6089 




THB


Thai baht


36,386 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5633 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,7094 




INR


Indian rupee


88,0145 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-118/21: Action brought on 22 February 2021 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS)
Date: 2021-02-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, data transmission, downloading, music, recording, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021128EN.01005101.xml










12.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/51






Action brought on 22 February 2021 — Cilem Records International v EUIPO — KVZ Music (HALIX RECORDS)
(Case T-118/21)
(2021/C 128/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Cilem Records International UG (Augsburg, Germany) (represented by: E. Hecht, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: KVZ Music Ltd (Sofia, Bulgaria)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for registration of EU word mark HALIX RECORDS — Application for registration No 16 288 235

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 January 2021 in Case R 1060/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision of 28 January 2021 and EUIPO’s decision of 25 May 2020 concerning EU trade mark No 016288235 and allow the applicant’s opposition to registration of EU trade mark No 16288235 of 17 April 2017;










—


in the alternative, annul the contested decision of 28 January 2021 and refer the proceedings back to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10010 — Investindustrial Group/CSM Ingredients) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 351/08
Date: 2021-02-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bakery, confectionery, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, semi-manufactured goods








C_2021351EN.01002101.xml










1.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/21






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10010 — Investindustrial Group/CSM Ingredients)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 351/08)
On 22 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10010. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.