do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-567/20: Order of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — ML v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Public procurement — Call for tenders — Sustainable catering services for the Commission in Brussels and its surrounding areas — Rejection of the tender of a tenderer — Annulment of the call for tenders — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: catering, catering industry, principle of proportionality, public procurement, services contract, tendering








C_2021148EN.01001702.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/17






Order of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — ML v Commission
(Case T-567/20) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Public procurement - Call for tenders - Sustainable catering services for the Commission in Brussels and its surrounding areas - Rejection of the tender of a tenderer - Annulment of the call for tenders - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 148/24)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ML (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. André and M. Ilkova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision of 30 June 2020 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of the call for tenders OIB/2019/CPN/039 concerning sustainable catering services for the Commission in the Brussels-Capital Region and surrounding areas and, secondly, under Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the losses allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby orders:






1.


There is no longer any need to rule on the action.










2.


The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay half of the costs incurred by ML.










3.


ML shall bear half of its costs.






(1)  OJ C 371, 3.11.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10136 — PGGM/Arcus/AMP/Alpha Trains) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 61/03
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, vehicle on rails, vehicle rental








C_2021061EN.01000301.xml










22.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 61/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10136 — PGGM/Arcus/AMP/Alpha Trains)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 61/03)
On 17 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10136. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-99/21: Action brought on 17 February 2021 — Construcciones Electromecanicas Sabero v EUIPO — Magdalenas de las Heras (Heras Bareche)
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business management, catering industry, coffee, confectionery, franchising, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, wholesale trade








C_2021138EN.01004801.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/48






Action brought on 17 February 2021 — Construcciones Electromecanicas Sabero v EUIPO — Magdalenas de las Heras (Heras Bareche)
(Case T-99/21)
(2021/C 138/64)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Construcciones Electromecanicas Sabero, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, P. Román Maestre and D. Liern Cendrero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Magdalenas de las Heras, SA (Aranda de Duero, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Heras Bareche — Application for registration No 17 979 710

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2020 in Case R 1019/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare that Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was erroneously applied in the contested decision;










—


Grant protection in respect of all the goods and services sought in the application for registration of EU trade mark No 17 979 710 Heras Bareche (figurative) in Classes 30 and 35.










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs associated with these proceedings, including the representation costs incurred by the applicant





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 16 February 2021 2021/C 57/02
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021057EN.01000201.xml










17.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 57/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

16 February 2021
(2021/C 57/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2143 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,16 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4367 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87333 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0415 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0800 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1938 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,753 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,51 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4942 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8760 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,4673 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5613 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5365 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4139 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6774 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6086 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,09 




ZAR


South African rand


17,6544 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8422 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5720 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 974,40 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8936 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,606 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,3431 




THB


Thai baht


36,332 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5209 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3866 




INR


Indian rupee


88,4195 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10116 — ION/NN/bpfBOUW/IRP JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 66/03
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, banking, economic concentration, housing, insurance, investment company, merger control, pension scheme, property development, real estate business








C_2021066EN.01003301.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/33






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10116 — ION/NN/bpfBOUW/IRP JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 66/03)
On 17 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10116. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-238/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (State aid — Air transport market in Sweden, from Sweden and to Sweden — Loan guarantees to support airlines amid the Covid-19 pandemic — Decision not to raise any objections — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Criterion of holding a licence issued by the Swedish authorities — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Article 107(3)(b) TFEU — Ratio legis — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, Sweden, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, credit guarantee, discrimination on the basis of nationality, epidemic, restriction on competition, transport licence








C_2021138EN.01003001.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/30






Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — Ryanair v Commission
(Case T-238/20) (1)

(State aid - Air transport market in Sweden, from Sweden and to Sweden - Loan guarantees to support airlines amid the Covid-19 pandemic - Decision not to raise any objections - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Criterion of holding a licence issued by the Swedish authorities - Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Ratio legis - Duty to state reasons)
(2021/C 138/40)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F. C. Laprévote, S. Rating and I. G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier, C. Mosser, A. Daniel and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: C. Meyer-Seitz, H. Eklinder, A. Runeskjöld, M. Salborn Hodgson, H. Shev, R. Shahsavan Eriksson and J. Lundberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 2366 final of 11 April 2020 on State Aid SA.56812 (2020/N) — Sweden — COVID-19: Loan guarantee scheme to airlines.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;










3.


Orders the French Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own respective costs.






(1)  OJ C 209, 22.6.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10109 — Cinven/BCI/Compre) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 66/08
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, insurance company, investment company, merger control, provision of services, public sector, reinsurance








C_2021066EN.01003801.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/38






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10109 — Cinven/BCI/Compre)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 66/08)
On 17 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10109. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-259/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — Ryanair v Commission (State aid — French air transport market — Deferral of payment of civil aviation tax and solidarity tax on airline tickets due on a monthly basis during the period from March to December 2020 in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic — Decision not to raise any objections — Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence — Free provision of services — Equal treatment — Criterion of holding a licence issued by the French authorities — Proportionality — Article 107(2)(b) TFEU — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2021-02-17
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, carriage of passengers, coronavirus disease, discrimination on the basis of nationality, epidemic, freedom to provide services, low cost airline








C_2021138EN.01003101.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/31






Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2021 — Ryanair v Commission
(Case T-259/20) (1)

(State aid - French air transport market - Deferral of payment of civil aviation tax and solidarity tax on airline tickets due on a monthly basis during the period from March to December 2020 in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic - Decision not to raise any objections - Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence - Free provision of services - Equal treatment - Criterion of holding a licence issued by the French authorities - Proportionality - Article 107(2)(b) TFEU - Duty to state reasons)
(2021/C 138/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F. C. Laprévote, S. Rating and I. G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and C. Georgieva-Kecsmar, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: E. de Moustier, C. Mosser, A. Daniel and P. Dodeller, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2020) 2097 final of 31 March 2020 on State Aid SA.56765 (2020/N) — France — Covid-19 — Deferral of the payment of airline taxes in favour of public air transport undertakings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission, including the costs relating to the request for confidential treatment;










3.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 215, 29.6.2020.