do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-95/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2021382EN.01000602.xml










20.9.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 382/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v AirHelp Germany GmbH
(Case C-95/21)
(2021/C 382/08)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Defendant and appellant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Applicant and respondent: AirHelp Germany GmbH
This case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021.
Case T-753/19: Order of the General Court of 16 February 2021 — Ungureanu v Commission (Action for damages — Law governing the institutions — Alleged unlawfulness stemming from the failure to bring an action for a declaration of a failure to fulfil obligations under Article 258 TFEU — Discretionary power of the Commission — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Romania, competence of the institution, discretionary power, health care, health legislation, indemnification, medicinal product, right to health








C_2021148EN.01001701.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/17






Order of the General Court of 16 February 2021 — Ungureanu v Commission
(Case T-753/19) (1)

(Action for damages - Law governing the institutions - Alleged unlawfulness stemming from the failure to bring an action for a declaration of a failure to fulfil obligations under Article 258 TFEU - Discretionary power of the Commission - Action manifestly inadmissible)
(2021/C 148/23)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Simeda Ungureanu (Cluj-Napoca, Romania) (represented by: R. Chiriţă, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and M. Carpus Carcea, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the infringement by the Commission of its obligation to ensure that Romania complies with the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Ms Simeda Ungureanu shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.
Information concerning the entry into force of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Armenia, EAEC, cooperation agreement (EU), cooperation policy








L_2021055EN.01000101.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 55/1







Information concerning the entry into force of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part

The Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, signed in Brussels on 24 November 2017
          (1), enters into force on 1 March 2021, in accordance with Article 385(2) of the Agreement. The last instrument of ratification or approval was deposited on 25 January 2021.


(1)  
            OJ L 23, 26.1.2018, p. 4.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10135 — Nordic Capital/Astorg Asset Management/Cytel) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 104/02
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: biotechnology, corporate governance, economic concentration, financial services, healthcare industry, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, technology








C_2021104EN.01000201.xml










26.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10135 — Nordic Capital/Astorg Asset Management/Cytel)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 104/02)
On 16 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10135. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10079 — SARP/Suez RV Osis) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 54/05
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Belgium, France, Luxembourg, economic concentration, maintenance, merger control, provision of services, public sanitation, water treatment








C_2021054EN.01000601.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/6






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10079 — SARP/Suez RV Osis)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 54/05)

1.   
On 9 February 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage (‘SARP’, France), controlled by Veolia Environnement (France);










—


Suez RV OSIS (‘OSIS’, France), belonging to the Suez group.




SARP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of OSIS.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for SARP: a service provider active in the maintenance of sanitation networks and installations, as well as industrial cleaning, mainly in France. SARP is controlled by Veolia Environnement, which provides water, waste and energy management services;










—


OSIS: a service provider active in the maintenance of sanitation networks and installations, as well as industrial cleaning, in France, Belgium and Luxembourg.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2), it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit any observations they may have on the proposed transaction to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10079 — SARP/Suez RV Osis
Observations can be sent to the Commission by e-mail, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussels




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-97/21: Action brought on 16 February 2021 — Synesis v Council
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person








C_2021148EN.01002201.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/22






Action brought on 16 February 2021 — Synesis v Council
(Case T-97/21)
(2021/C 148/30)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Synesis OOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: G. Lansky and A. Egger, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, annul Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2020/2130 of 17 December 2020 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2020 L 426 I, p. 14) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2129 of 17 December 2020 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2020 L 426 I, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicant;










—


pursuant to Article 134 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the argument that the contested measures are unlawful in so far as they concern the applicant, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Council committed a manifest error of assessment and in particular infringed its examination obligations. In the applicant’s view, the Council failed to provide any concrete evidence to justify the validity of the applicant’s inclusion on the list in the contested measures.
Case C-96/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, leisure, provision of services, termination of a contract








C_2021138EN.01002201.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — DM v CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA
(Case C-96/21)
(2021/C 138/29)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Bremen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: DM

Defendant: CTS Eventim AG & Co. KGaA

Question referred

Is Article 16(l) of Directive 2011/83/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 (‘the Consumer Rights Directive’) to be interpreted as meaning that it is sufficient for the exclusion of the consumer’s right of withdrawal if the trader does not directly provide the consumer with a service related to leisure activities but sells the consumer a right of access to such a service?


(1)  Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 304, p. 64).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10110 — IKB/Hypoport/Fundingport) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 54/04
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: credit, economic concentration, financial institution, merger control








C_2021054EN.01000401.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/4






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10110 — IKB/Hypoport/Fundingport)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 54/04)

1.   
On 9 February 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG (‘IKB’, Germany);










—


Hypoport SE (‘Hypoport’, Germany); and










—


Fundingport GmbH (‘Fundingport’, Germany)




IKB and Hypoport acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Fundingport.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


IKB is a financial company, inter alia providing credit for mid-sized corporate clients as well as assisting mid-sized companies with consultancy services on credit and capital market matters.










—


Hypoport is a fin-tech company, operating several subsidiaries in the area of credit, real estate and insurance.










—


Fundingport operates a platform for the provision of credits for medium-sized corporate clients. Its business activities are currently concentrated on financing of projects in the area of renewable energies.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10110 — IKB/Hypoport/Fundingport
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Industry 5.0 : human-centric, sustainable and resilient.
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
Subjects: EU financing, digitisation, humanisation of work, industrial research, new technology, sustainable development

Research and 
Innovation

HUMAN- 
CENTRIC

... promotes talents, diversity 
and empowerment

RESILIENT

SUSTAINABLE

... is agile and resilient  
with flexible and adaptable technologies

... leads action on sustainability  
and respects planetary boundaries

Improved  
SAFETY and  
WELL-BEING

COMPETITVE  
EDGE in new
markets

REDUCED COST 
due to resource 
efficiency

Adapted
TRAINING 
FOR EVOLVING 
SKILLS

EMPOWERED 
WORKERS 
remaining in 
control

Competitve  
industry by 
ATTRACTING 
BEST TALENT

Examining the future 
impact of new 
technologies  
on JOBS,  
BUSINESS MODELS 
AND WELFARE

Demonstrating ways 
FACTORY WORKERS 
AND AUTOMATION  
can operate in harmony, 
increasing productivity, 
quality, performance, 
satisfaction  
and safety

Showing how cyber-physical 
systems, product life-cycle 
management, life-cycle 
assessment, augmented 
reality, and artificial 
intelligence technologies 
and methods can transform 
CIRCULAR 
MANUFACTURING

INDUSTRY 5.0 recognises the power of industry to achieve societal goals  
beyond jobs and growth to become a RESILIENT PROVIDER OF PROSPERITY,  
by making production RESPECT THE BOUNDARIES OF OUR PLANET and placing  
the WELLBEING OF THE INDUSTRY WORKER at the centre of the production process.

Research and 
Innovation

INDUSTRY 5.0human-centric, sustainable and resilientFrom shareholderto stakeholder value…ACCELERATING production processesDigitalisation is ……CHANGINGthe role of workersThis transformation is Industry 4.0…TRANSFORMINGEuropeanindustryIndustry 5.0 …Why Industry 5.0?Industry 5.0 is a SOLUTION PROVIDER for people and for our planetHow EU-funded research contributes to Industry 5.0Some examplesKYKLOS 4.03BEYOND 4.01HuMan Manufacturing 2Industry 5.0Find out more© European Union, 2020.  |  Images: @Freepik.com | Publications Office of the European Union  |  ISBN: 978-92-76-21584-4  DOI:10.2777/073781  KI-02-20-666-EN-N#Industry5.0#ResearchImpactEU@EUScienceInnov
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 February 2021 2021/C 54/03
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021054EN.01000301.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 February 2021
(2021/C 54/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2129 




JPY


Japanese yen


127,72 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4366 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87225 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0435 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0802 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,1963 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,682 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,15 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4864 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8753 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,4418 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5602 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5346 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4033 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6785 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6046 




KRW


South Korean won


1 337,12 




ZAR


South African rand


17,5006 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8332 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5720 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 857,31 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8934 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,136 




RUB


Russian rouble


88,9548 




THB


Thai baht


36,254 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5134 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,1825 




INR


Indian rupee


88,0680 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-94/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v FT
Date: 2021-02-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller








C_2021422EN.01000201.xml










18.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 422/2






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Köln (Germany) lodged on 16 February 2021 — Deutsche Lufthansa AG v FT
(Case C-94/21)
(2021/C 422/02)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Köln

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Defendant: FT
The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the President of the Court of 17 June 2021.