do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-506/19 P: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2021 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, Hafize Darya Shipping Lines (HDSL), Safiran Payam Darya Shipping Lines (SAPID), Khazar Sea Shipping Lines Co., Rahbaran Omid Darya Ship Management Co., Irinvestship Ltd, IRISL Europe GmbH v Council of the European Union
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, discretionary power, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation, proof








C_2021182EN.01004901.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/49






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 11 February 2021 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines, Hafize Darya Shipping Lines (HDSL), Safiran Payam Darya Shipping Lines (SAPID), Khazar Sea Shipping Lines Co., Rahbaran Omid Darya Ship Management Co., Irinvestship Ltd, IRISL Europe GmbH v Council of the European Union
(Case C-506/19 P) (1)

(2021/C 182/64)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 319, 23.9.2019.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (Official Journal of the European Union L 84 of 31 March 2016)
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union, European Parliament
Subjects: animal disease, disease prevention, epidemic, health risk, protection of animal life, veterinary inspection, veterinary medicine








L_2021048EN.01000301.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 48/3







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 84 of 31 March 2016
)








(1)


On page 71, point (a) of Article 81:




for:


                  ‘ … in Article 30(1) …’,

read:


                  ‘ … in Article 31(1) …’.







(2)


On page 143, in point (d)(iii) of Article 227:




for:


                  ‘… in Articles 165 and 168…’,

read:


                  ‘… in Articles 167 and 168…’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9686 – Mitsui/Belchim Crop Protection) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 245/05
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, pesticides industry








C_2021245EN.01000501.xml










24.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 245/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9686 – Mitsui/Belchim Crop Protection)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 245/05)
On 11 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M9686. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 10 February 2021 2021/C 48/04
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021048EN.01000401.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

10 February 2021
(2021/C 48/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2127 




JPY


Japanese yen


127,04 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4373 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87650 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0800 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0805 




ISK


Iceland króna


155,20 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2280 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,835 




HUF


Hungarian forint


357,53 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4819 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8752 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,5503 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5682 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5394 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4014 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6803 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6080 




KRW


South Korean won


1 340,67 




ZAR


South African rand


17,8301 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8235 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5645 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 956,58 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9042 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,269 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,5116 




THB


Thai baht


36,266 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5641 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3776 




INR


Indian rupee


88,3185 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-755/19: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — T.H.C. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Asylum policy — Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection — Directive 2013/32/EU — Article 46 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Action brought against the rejection of a subsequent application for international protection as inadmissible — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Detention)
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: action brought before an administrative court, asylum seeker, foreign national, limitation of legal proceedings, right of asylum, right to justice








C_2021182EN.01002202.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/22






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — Belgium) — T.H.C. v Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides
(Case C-755/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Asylum policy - Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection - Directive 2013/32/EU - Article 46 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy - Action brought against the rejection of a subsequent application for international protection as inadmissible - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Detention)
(2021/C 182/31)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: T.H.C.

Defendant: Commissaire général aux réfugiés et aux apatrides

Operative part of the order

Article 46 of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which subjects an appeal against a decision to reject a subsequent application for international protection to a time limit of five days, including public holidays, where the applicant concerned is held in detention, provided, first, that the principle of equivalence is observed and, second, that genuine access for the applicants held in detention to the procedural safeguards granted by EU law to applicants for international protection is ensured within that period.
It is for the national court to ascertain whether the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings meets those requirements.


(1)  OJ C 423, 16.12.2019.
Case C-77/20: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K. M. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 — Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy — Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size — Article 89 — Measures to ensure compliance — Article 90 — Criminal sanctions — Principle of proportionality)
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: common fisheries policy, conservation of fish stocks, fishing regulations, fishing vessel, penalty, principle of proportionality, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2021128EN.01000501.xml










12.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/5






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — Ireland) — Criminal proceedings against K. M.
(Case C-77/20) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common fisheries policy - Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 - Control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy - Use on board a fishing vessel of equipment which is capable of automatically grading fish by size - Article 89 - Measures to ensure compliance - Article 90 - Criminal sanctions - Principle of proportionality)
(2021/C 128/05)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties in the main proceedings

K. M.

Other party: Director of Public Prosecutions

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 89 and 90 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006, read in the light of the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to the verifications which it is for the referring court to carry out, they do not preclude a national provision which, to penalise a breach of Article 32 of Council Regulation (EC) No 850/98 of 30 March 1998 for the conservation of fishery resources through technical measures for the protection of juveniles of marine organisms, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 227/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013, provides for not only the imposition of a fine but also the mandatory forfeiture of the catches and the prohibited or non-compliant fishing gear found on board the vessel concerned.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 48/07
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Norway, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, foundation, trade event








C_2021048EN.01001001.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/10






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 48/07)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


30 October 2020




Case No


85720




Decision No


124/20/COL




EFTA State


Norway




Region


Stavanger




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


COVID-19 compensation to the ONS Foundation




Legal basis


Allocation letter from the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy, implementing the objective of the Norwegian Parliament’s decision of 9 October 2020, appropriating state aid in the amount of NOK 21 million to the ONS Foundation.




Type of measure


Individual aid




Objective


Compensation of damage cause by exceptional occurrence




Form of aid


Direct grant




Budget


NOK 21 million




Intensity


70 % (estimate)




Economic sectors


Organisation of conventions and trade shows




Name and address of the granting authority







The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy




Postboks 8148 Dep.




0033 Oslo




NORWAY








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/242 of 11 February 2021 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Tepertős pogácsa’ (TSG))
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, bread, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2021057EN.01007601.xml










18.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 57/76








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/242
of 11 February 2021
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Tepertős pogácsa’ (TSG))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Hungary’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the traditional speciality guaranteed ‘Tepertős pogácsa’, registered under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1144/2013 (2), as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1415 (3).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (4) as required by Article 50(2)(b) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Tepertős pogácsa’ (TSG) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 February 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1144/2013 of 13 November 2013 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Tepertős pogácsa (TSG)] (OJ L 303, 14.11.2013, p. 17).

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1415 of 24 August 2016 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Tepertős pogácsa (TSG)) (OJ L 230, 25.8.2016, p. 20).

(4)  
            OJ C 293, 4.9.2020, p. 6.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2021/C 48/08
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2021048EN.01001101.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/11






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2021/C 48/08)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


6 November 2020




Case No


85756




Decision No


128/20/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title


COVID-19 Closure grants




Legal basis


Act No 38/2020 on closure grants




Type of measure


Scheme




Objective


The objective of the measure is to maintain the level of employment and economic activity in Iceland by supporting undertakings that have incurred a temporary loss of income due to the COVID-19 pandemic and measures imposed to fight the spreading of the virus.




Form of aid


Direct grants




Budget


An estimated budget ISK 1 billion and a maximum budget ISK 2 billion




Duration


Until 30 June 2021




Economic sectors


All sectors




Name and address of the granting authority







Iceland Revenue and Customs




Tryggvagata 19




101 Reykjavík




ICELAND








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 147/01
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: European Economic Area, Finland, Norway, Sweden, economic concentration, intelligent transport system, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2021147EN.01000101.xml










26.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 147/01)
On 11 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/246 of 11 February 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Újfehértói meggy’ (PGI)
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, Northern Alföld, designation of origin, labelling, product designation, stone fruit








L_2021057EN.01008201.xml










18.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 57/82








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/246
of 11 February 2021
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Újfehértói meggy’ (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary’s application to register the name ‘Újfehértói meggy’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Újfehértói meggy’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Újfehértói meggy’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 11 February 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 319, 28.9.2020, p. 15.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Corrigendum to the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union signed in Brussels on 27 July 2020 (Official Journal of the European Union L 330 of 9 October 2020)
Date: 2021-02-11
Institutions: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, United Kingdom
Subjects: Croatia, Mediterranean region (EU), Tunisia, Union for the Mediterranean, accession to the European Union, association agreement (EU), protocol to an agreement








L_2021048EN.01000501.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 48/5







Corrigendum to the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part, to take account of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union signed in Brussels on 27 July 2020
         

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 330 of 9 October 2020
)


On page 4, Chapter I, Article 2, introductory wording:
for:


                  ‘Protocol 6 shall be amended as follows: … ’,

read:


                  ‘Protocol 4 shall be amended as follows: … ’.