do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-488/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — XC v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 — Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition — Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability — Access to documents — Refusal of access to the questions asked during a test — Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings — Regulation (EU) No 1049/2001 — Open competition EPSO/AD/356/18 — Reserve list — Action for annulment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility — Liability)
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, admissibility, competition (EU), confidentiality, disclosure of information, discrimination based on disability, recruitment








C_2021128EN.01003201.xml










12.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/32






Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — XC v Commission
(Case T-488/18) (1)

(Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 - Decision of the selection board to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition - Principle of non-discrimination on the ground of disability - Access to documents - Refusal of access to the questions asked during a test - Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings - Regulation (EU) No 1049/2001 - Open competition EPSO/AD/356/18 - Reserve list - Action for annulment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility - Liability)
(2021/C 128/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: XC (represented by: C. Bottino, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina and L. Vernier, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

First, application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AD/338/17 of 4 December 2017 to exclude the applicant from the next phase of the competition, second application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 3969 of 19 June 2018 on access to documents, third, application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the reserve list of open competition EPSO/AD/356/18, published on 22 May 2019, and, fourth, application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking compensation for various losses allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders XC to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.
Case T-519/19: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Forte v Parliament (Institutional law — Single statute for Members of the European Parliament — Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies — Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions — Adjustment of the amount of pensions for Italian national deputies — Corresponding amendment by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy — Competence of the author of the act — Obligation to state reasons — Acquired rights — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Right to property — Proportionality — Equal treatment)
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Bureau of the EP, Member of the European Parliament, Statute for Members of the Parliament, allowances and expenses, equal treatment, pension scheme, primacy of EU law, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, retroactivity of a law








C_2021128EN.01003302.xml










12.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/33






Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Forte v Parliament
(Case T-519/19) (1)

(Institutional law - Single statute for Members of the European Parliament - Members of the European Parliament elected in Italian constituencies - Adoption by the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati (Office of the President of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, Italy) of Decision No 14/2018, on pensions - Adjustment of the amount of pensions for Italian national deputies - Corresponding amendment by the European Parliament of the amount of the pensions of certain former Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy - Competence of the author of the act - Obligation to state reasons - Acquired rights - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Right to property - Proportionality - Equal treatment)
(2021/C 128/40)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Mario Forte (Naples, Italy) (represented by: C. Forte and G. Forte, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the note of 11 June 2019 prepared by the Parliament relating to the adjustment of the amount of the pension received by the applicant upon the entry into force, on 1 January 2019, of Decision No 14/2018 of the Ufficio di Presidenza della Camera dei deputati.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Mario Forte to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament.






(1)  OJ C 305, 9.9.2019.
Case T-585/18: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Şanli v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds — List of persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Action for annulment and compensation — Failure to comply with formal requirements — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, fight against crime, international sanctions, legal person, natural person, principle of proportionality, principle of subsidiarity, rights of the defence, terrorism








C_2021110EN.01002601.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/26






Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Şanli v Council
(Case T-585/18) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - List of persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources - Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list - Action for annulment and compensation - Failure to comply with formal requirements - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 110/28)
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Dalokay Şanli (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: D. Gürses and J. M. Langenberg, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Van Overmeire and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/1084 of 30 July 2018 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision (CFSP) 2018/475 (OJ 2018 L 194, p. 144), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1071 of 30 July 2018 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/468 (OJ 2018 L 194, p. 23), in so far as they concern the applicant and, second, action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the harm suffered as a result of the unlawfulness of those measures.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Dalokay Şanli to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Case T-153/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, interpreting, recording medium, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, translation








C_2021110EN.01002901.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/29






Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA)
(Case T-153/20) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 110/32)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Gabriele Bachmann (Bad Grönenbach, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 December 2019 (Case R 2346/2019 2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign LIGHTYOGA as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Gabriele Bachmann to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9162 — Fincantieri/Chantiers de l’Atlantique) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 47/03
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, maintenance, merger control, shipbuilding








C_2021047EN.01000301.xml










10.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 47/3






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.9162 — Fincantieri/Chantiers de l’Atlantique)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 47/03)
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
On 25 September 2019, the European Commission received notification (1) of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) (‘Merger Regulation’).
On 30 October 2019, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings (3) under Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation. On 2 February 2021, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification and demonstrated that it abandoned the concentration.


(1)  OJ C C 331, 2 October 2019, p. 6.

(2)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(3)  OJ C C 382, 11 November 2019, p. 2.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 9 February 2021 2021/C 47/06
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021047EN.01000601.xml










10.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 47/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 February 2021
(2021/C 47/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2104 




JPY


Japanese yen


126,58 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4369 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87828 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1058 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0817 




ISK


Iceland króna


154,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,2588 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,738 




HUF


Hungarian forint


358,88 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4761 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8753 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,5883 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5681 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5414 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,3827 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6741 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6074 




KRW


South Korean won


1 347,42 




ZAR


South African rand


17,8953 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7894 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5670 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 929,80 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8997 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,142 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,6164 




THB


Thai baht


36,239 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5530 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3205 




INR


Indian rupee


88,2765 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10004 — EQT/Zentricity/Cajelo/Recipharm) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 66/07
Date: 2021-02-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, logistics, merger control, packaging, pharmaceutical industry








C_2021066EN.01003701.xml










26.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/37






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10004 — EQT/Zentricity/Cajelo/Recipharm)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 66/07)
On 10 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10004. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.