do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/180 of 9 February 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [‘Dalmatinska pečenica’ (PGI)]
Date: 2021-02-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: County of Dubrovnik-Neretva, County of Lika-Senj, County of Split-Dalmatia, County of Zadar, County of Šibenik-Knin, Croatia, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, preserved product, product designation








L_2021053EN.01009801.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 53/98








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/180
of 9 February 2021
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [‘Dalmatinska pečenica’ (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Dalmatinska pečenica’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Dalmatinska pečenica’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Dalmatinska pečenica’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. – Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 9 February 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 309, 18.9.2020, p. 9.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10024 – Blackstone / Winoa) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 467/01
Date: 2021-02-09
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, metallurgical industry








C_2021467EN.01000101.xml










19.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 467/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10024 – Blackstone / Winoa)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 467/01)
On 9 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10024. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-81/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., W.S. v M.
Date: 2021-02-09
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, unfair terms of contract








C_2021242EN.01000302.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/3






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 9 February 2021 — B.S., W.S. v M.
(Case C-81/21)
(2021/C 242/05)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: B.S., W.S.

Defendant: M.

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of provisions of national legislation under which a court, where it finds that a contractual term is unfair, without that rendering the agreement invalid, may supplement the content of the agreement with a supplementary provision of national law?










2.


Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation under which a court, where it finds that a contractual term is unfair, with the result that the agreement is invalid, may supplement the content of the agreement with a supplementary provision of national law, in order to prevent the agreement from being invalid, even though the consumer consents to its being invalid?






(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.