do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-171/21 P: Appeal brought on 8 February 2021 by Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 January 2021 in Case T-603/20, Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak v European Commission
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Croatia, damages, infringement of EU law, liquidation, protection of shareholders








C_2021462EN.01002401.xml










15.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 462/24






Appeal brought on 8 February 2021 by Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 28 January 2021 in Case T-603/20, Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak v European Commission
(Case C-171/21 P)
(2021/C 462/25)
Language of the case: Croatian

Parties


Appellants: Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Gojko Čuljak (represented by: I. Žalac, odvjetnik)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 1 September 2021, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as manifestly unfounded, dismissed the application for legal aid lodged by Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Mr Gojko Čuljak, and ruled that Likvidacijska masa iza Mesoprodukt d.o.o. and Mr Čuljak are to bear their own costs.
Notice for the attention of the person to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan apply 2021/C 43/05
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, South Sudan, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021043EN.01001401.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/14






Notice for the attention of the person to whom restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan apply
(2021/C 43/05)
The following information is brought to the attention of the person that appears in Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 (1) and Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (2) concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan.
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of persons designated in the above-mentioned Annexes, has determined that the restrictive measures provided for in Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and in Regulation (EU) 2015/735 should continue to apply to that person.
The attention of the person concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites listed in Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2015/735, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 6 of the Regulation).
The person concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include that person on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, by 30 November 2021, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 52.

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.
Case C-80/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 8 February 2021 — E.K., S.K. v D.B.P.
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer protection, unfair terms of contract








C_2021242EN.01000301.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/3






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 8 February 2021 — E.K., S.K. v D.B.P.
(Case C-80/21)
(2021/C 242/04)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy dla Warszawy — Śródmieścia w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: E.K., S.K.

Defendant: D.B.P.

Questions referred







1.


Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation under which a court finds that a contractual term is unfair not in its entirety, but only in the part thereof which renders the term unfair, as a result of which that term remains partially effective?










2.


Must Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as precluding a judicial interpretation of national legislation under which a court, having found that a contractual term is unfair, without which the contract could not continue in existence, may modify the remainder of the contract by interpreting the parties’ declarations of intent, in order to prevent the contract, which is beneficial to the consumer, from being invalid?






(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/179 of 8 February 2021 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Dalmatinska panceta’ (PGI))
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: County of Dubrovnik-Neretva, County of Lika-Senj, County of Split-Dalmatia, County of Zadar, County of Šibenik-Knin, Croatia, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, preserved product, product designation








L_2021053EN.01009701.xml










16.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 53/97








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2021/179
of 8 February 2021
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Dalmatinska panceta’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Dalmatinska panceta’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Dalmatinska panceta’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Dalmatinska panceta’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 February 2021.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 309, 18.9.2020, p. 13.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan apply 2021/C 43/06
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, South Sudan, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2021043EN.01001501.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/15






Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 concerning restrictive measures in respect of the situation in South Sudan apply
(2021/C 43/06)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).
The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 (2) and Council Regulation (EU) 2015/735 (3).
The controller of this processing operation is the Department RELEX.1.C in the Directorate-General for Foreign Affairs, Enlargement and Civil Protection – RELEX of the General Secretariat of the Council (GSC), that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
The GSC’s Data Protection Officer can be contacted at:
Data Protection Officer
data.protection@consilium.europa.eu
The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Regulation (EU) 2015/735.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision (CFSP) 2015/740 and Regulation (EU) 2015/735.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 (edps@edps.europa.eu).


(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 52.

(3)  OJ L 117, 8.5.2015, p. 13.
Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2021/48 of 22 January 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 147/2003 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Somalia (Official Journal of the European Union L 23 of 25 January 2021)
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Somalia, arms trade, economic sanctions, explosive, export (EU), export restriction, international sanctions, military equipment, paramilitary force








L_2021043EN.01006101.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 43/61







Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) 2021/48 of 22 January 2021 amending Regulation (EC) No 147/2003 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Somalia

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 23 of 25 January 2021
)


On page 1, recital 3:
for:


                  ‘On 22 January 2021, Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/48 …’,

read:


                  ‘On 22 January 2021, Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/54 …’;

and footnote 4:
for:


                  ‘(4) See page 1 of this Official Journal.’,

read:


                  ‘(4) See page 18 of this Official Journal.’.
Case C-77/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 8 February 2021 — Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: data collection, data protection, database, personal data








C_2021182EN.01003001.xml










10.5.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/30






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Hungary) lodged on 8 February 2021 — Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft. v Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság
(Case C-77/21)
(2021/C 182/43)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Törvényszék

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Digi Távközlési és Szolgáltató Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adatvédelmi és Információszabadság Hatóság

Questions referred







1.


Must the concept of ‘purpose limitation’ as defined in Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (1) (the ‘Regulation’), be interpreted as meaning that the fact that the controller stores in parallel in another database personal data which were otherwise collected and stored for a limited legitimate purpose is consistent with that concept or, conversely, is the limited legitimate purpose of collecting those data no longer valid so far as the parallel database is concerned?










2.


Should the answer to the first question referred be that the parallel storage of data is in itself incompatible with the principle of ‘purpose limitation’, is the fact that the controller stores in parallel in another database personal data which were otherwise collected and stored for a limited legitimate purpose compatible with the principle of ‘storage limitation’ established in Article 5(1)(e) of the Regulation?






(1)  OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 5 February 2021 2021/C 43/08
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021043EN.01001701.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/17






Euro exchange rates (1)

5 February 2021
(2021/C 43/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1983 




JPY


Japanese yen


126,72 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4362 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87538 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1228 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0825 




ISK


Iceland króna


154,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3068 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,806 




HUF


Hungarian forint


356,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5023 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8747 




TRY


Turkish lira


8,4753 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5761 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5344 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2900 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6776 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6033 




KRW


South Korean won


1 345,45 




ZAR


South African rand


17,9407 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7535 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5613 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 820,24 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8777 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,641 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,6325 




THB


Thai baht


36,069 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,5248 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,3490 




INR


Indian rupee


87,3670 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran 2021/C 43/07
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021043EN.01001601.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/16






Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 359/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran
(2021/C 43/07)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr. AHMADI- MOQADDAM Esmail (no 1), Mr. FAZLI Ali (no 4), Mr. MOTLAGH Bahram Hosseini (no 8), Mr. RAJABZADEH Azizollah (no 11), Mr. JAFARI- DOLATABADI Abbas (no 19), Mr. MOHSENI-EJEI Gholam-Hossein (no 21), Mr. MORTAZAVI Said (no 22), Mr. ZARGAR Ahmad (no 27), Mr. ABBASZADEH- MESHKINI, Mahmoud (no 33), Mr. AKBARSHAHI Ali-Reza (no 34), Mr. GANJI Mostafa Barzegar (no 39), Mr. HABIBI Mohammad Reza (no 40), Mr. HEJAZI Mohammad (no 41), Mr. JAZAYERI Massoud (no 44), Mr. JOKAR Mohammad Saleh (no 45), Mr. KAMALIAN Behrouz (no 46), Mr. KHALILOLLAHI Moussa (no 47), Mr. MAHSOULI Sadeq (no 48), Mr. LARIJANI Sadeq (no 65), Mr. MIRHEJAZI Ali (no 66), Mr. SAEEDI Ali (no 67), Mr. MORTAZAVI Seyyed Solat (no 69), Mr. RASHIDI AGHDAM Ali Ashraf (no 79) and Mr. KHORAMABADI, Abdolsamad (no 87), persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/235/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) 359/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 15 February 2021, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu
Any observations received before 26 February 2021 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review, in accordance with Article 3 of Decision 2011/235/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 359/2011.


(1)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 51.

(2)  OJ L 100, 14.4.2011, p. 1.
Case T-86/21: Action brought on 8 February 2021 — Distintiva Solutions v EUIPO — Makeblock (Makeblock)
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, hoisting equipment, registered trade mark, robotics, teaching materials, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2021110EN.01003601.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/36






Action brought on 8 February 2021 — Distintiva Solutions v EUIPO — Makeblock (Makeblock)
(Case T-86/21)
(2021/C 110/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Distintiva Solutions S. Coop. Pequeña (Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain) (represented by: M. J. Sanmartín Sanmartín, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Makeblock Co. Ltd (Shenzhen, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark Makeblock — European Union trade mark No 12 249 488

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2020 in Case R 988/2020-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay the costs of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-230/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 February 2021 — PNB Banka v ECB (Interim relief — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB — Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation — Application for suspension of operation of an act — No urgency)
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: banking supervision, credit institution, financial solvency, financial supervision, right of establishment, rights of the defence








C_2021138EN.01003302.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/33






Order of the President of the General Court of 8 February 2021 — PNB Banka v ECB
(Case T-230/20 R)
(Interim relief - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Application for suspension of operation of an act - No urgency)
(2021/C 138/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. Bonnard, V. Hümpfner and C. Hernández Saseta, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, V. Soņeca and E. Bārdiņš, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking the suspension of operation of the decision of the ECB of 17 February 2020 withdrawing the applicant’s authorisation.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim relief is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-85/21: Action brought on 8 February 2021 — QF v Commission
Date: 2021-02-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment








C_2021098EN.01003601.xml










22.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/36






Action brought on 8 February 2021 — QF v Commission
(Case T-85/21)
(2021/C 98/41)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: QF (represented by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision not to include his name on the reserve list for internal competition COM/03/AD/18;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging failure adequately to state reasons. The applicant takes the view that the statement of reasons consists of literal assessments, which are not consistent with the grades awarded. Moreover, the selection board has not communicated the assessment criteria adopted before the tests, so that neither the applicant nor the appointing authority was able to check the legality of those criteria.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of equal treatment. In that regard, the applicant relies in particular on the fact that the selection board modified, after the tests, the grades awarded by its members on the basis of an assessment grid, whereas that assessment grid was intended to ensure the equal treatment of candidates.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment committed by the selection board since that board was not in a position to justify to the requisite legal standard the manifest inconsistencies between the literal assessments and the numerical grades, having regard to a comparison with comparable assessments of other candidates.