do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-760/19: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Combined Nomenclature — Tariff classification — Headings 8472 and 9031 — Bank note validator and cash boxes — Device intended to be integrated in a host device and connected to an external control centre — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1760 — Validity)
Date: 2021-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, office equipment, paper money, specification of tariff heading








C_2021110EN.01001101.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/11






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — JCM Europe (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
(Case C-760/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Combined Nomenclature - Tariff classification - Headings 8472 and 9031 - Bank note validator and cash boxes - Device intended to be integrated in a host device and connected to an external control centre - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1760 - Validity)
(2021/C 110/09)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: JCM Europe (UK) Ltd

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Operative part of the judgment

The examination of the questions referred has disclosed no factor capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1760 of 28 September 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature.


(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10095 — Crédit Agricole Italia/Credito Valtellinese) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 48/01
Date: 2021-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Italy, banking, economic concentration, financial services, insurance, merger control








C_2021048EN.01000101.xml










11.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 48/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10095 — Crédit Agricole Italia/Credito Valtellinese)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 48/01)
On 4 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10095. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10120 — EQT/Molslinjen) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 47/05
Date: 2021-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, Germany, Sweden, economic concentration, ferryboat, inland transport, international transport, investment company, merger control








C_2021047EN.01000501.xml










10.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 47/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10120 — EQT/Molslinjen)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 47/05)
On 4 February 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10120. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice of open competition 2021/C 39/05
Date: 2021-02-04
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), job vacancy, recruitment, rural development, sustainable agriculture








C_2021039EN.01001901.xml










4.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 39/19






NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
(2021/C 39/05)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:
EPSO/AD/389/21 – ADMINISTRATORS (AD 6) IN THE FIELD OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The competition notice is published in 24 languages in 
Official Journal of the European Union C 39 A of 4 February 2021.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/
Case T-352/18: Order of the General Court of 4 February 2021 — Germann Avocats v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award criteria — Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)
Date: 2021-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: cultural pluralism, damages, dominant position, equal treatment, evaluation method, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, tendering, trade union, transparency in decision-making








C_2021098EN.01002801.xml










22.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/28






Order of the General Court of 4 February 2021 — Germann Avocats v Commission
(Case T-352/18) (1)

(Action for annulment and for damages - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Award criteria - Action in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law and in part manifestly inadmissible)
(2021/C 98/31)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Germann Avocats LLC (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Giannakopoulos and N. Skandamis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents, and by R. van Melsen, lawyer)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of the Commission’s decision to reject the applicant’s bid submitted in response to the call for tenders JUST/2017/RDIS/FW/EQUA/0042 (‘Follow-up study on trade union practices on non-discrimination and diversity’ (2017/S 215-446067)) and, secondly, application based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following the adoption of that decision.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Germann Avocats LLC shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 301, 27.8.2018.