Case C-922/19: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Waternet v MG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 97/7/EC — Article 9 — Directive 2011/83/EU — Article 27 — Directive 2005/29/EC — Article 5(5) — Annex I, point 29 — Unfair commercial practices — Concept of ‘inertia selling’ — Supply of drinking water)
Date: 2021-02-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: advertising malpractice, consumer protection, drinking water, provision of services, unfair terms of contract, water supply








C_2021110EN.01001201.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/12






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 February 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Stichting Waternet v MG
(Case C-922/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 97/7/EC - Article 9 - Directive 2011/83/EU - Article 27 - Directive 2005/29/EC - Article 5(5) - Annex I, point 29 - Unfair commercial practices - Concept of ‘inertia selling’ - Supply of drinking water)
(2021/C 110/11)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stichting Waternet

Defendant: MG

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 9 of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts and Article 27 of Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 5(5) of, and point 29 of Annex I to, Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council, do not regulate the formation of contracts, with the result that it is for the referring court to assess, in accordance with national legislation, whether a contract may be regarded as concluded between a water supply company and a consumer in the absence of the latter’s express consent;










2.


The concept of ‘inertia selling’, within the meaning of point 29 of Annex I to Directive 2005/29, must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to verifications by the referring court, it does not cover a commercial practice of a drinking water supply company consisting in maintaining the connection to the public water supply network when a consumer moves into a previously occupied dwelling, since that consumer does not have the choice of the supplier of that service, that supplier charges cost-covering, transparent and non-discriminatory rates that are proportionate to the water consumption, and the consumer knows that that dwelling is connected to the public water supply network and that water is supplied against payment.






(1)  OJ C 103, 30.3.2020.