do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10034 — Pizarreño/Maderas Arauco/E2E JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 24/04
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, economic concentration, merger control, wood industry








C_2021024EN.01000801.xml










22.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/8






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10034 — Pizarreño/Maderas Arauco/E2E JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 24/04)
On 18 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10034. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-33/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 18 January 2021 — Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: civil aviation, crew, jurisdiction, labour dispute, residence, social security legislation, wage earner








C_2021110EN.01002401.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/24






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 18 January 2021 — Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC
(Case C-33/21)
(2021/C 110/26)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: Istituto nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli infortuni sul lavoro (INAIL), Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)

Respondent: Ryanair DAC

Question referred

Can the concept of a person ‘employed principally in the territory of the Member State in which he resides’ contained in Article 14(2)(a)(ii) [of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, (1) as amended] be interpreted in the same way as that which (concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters, jurisdiction and individual contracts of employment (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001) (2)) Article 19(2)(a) [of the latter Regulation] defines as the ‘place where the employee habitually carries out his work’, including in the aviation and airline crew sector (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91), (3) as expressed in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union referred to in the grounds?


(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

(3)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (OJ 1991 L 373, p. 4).
Case C-26/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021242EN.01000202.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/2






Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Dermavita Co. Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-643/19, Dermavita v EUIPO — Allergan Holdings France (JUVEDERM ULTRA)
(Case C-26/21 P)
(2021/C 242/03)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Dermavita Co. Ltd (represented by: D. Todorov, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Allergan Holdings France SAS
By order of 4 May 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Dermavita Co. Ltd should bear its own costs.
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus 2021/C 18/02
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Belarus, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2021018EN.01000201.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 18/2






Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP and Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus
(2021/C 18/02)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr Yuri Khadzimuratavich KARAEU (no 5), Mr Genadz Arkadzievich KAZAKEVICH (no 6), Mr Aliaksandr Piatrovich BARSUKOU (no 7), Mr Yuri Genadzevich NAZARANKA (no 9), Mr Ivan Uladzimiravich KUBRAKOU (no 14), Mr Maxim Aliaksandravich GAMOLA (no 15), Mr Valeri Paulavich VAKULCHYK (no 27), Mr Aliaksandr Uladzimiravich KANYUK (no 32) and Mr Andrei Aliakseevich RAUKOU (no 58), persons appearing in the Annex to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1) and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 765/2006 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.
The Council is considering maintaining the restrictive measures against the abovementioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 25 January 2021, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu


(1)  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.
Case C-227/20: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 18 January 2021 — European Commission v Italian Republic
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: biodiversity, exploitation of resources, genetics, international convention, national implementing measure, plant variety right, protocol to an agreement, sanction (EU)








C_2021138EN.01002901.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/29






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 18 January 2021 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-227/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/36)
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 255, 3.8.2020.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10120—EQT/Molslinjen) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 18/13
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, Germany, Sweden, economic concentration, ferryboat, inland transport, international transport, investment company, merger control








C_2021018EN.01004401.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 18/44






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10120—EQT/Molslinjen)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 18/13)

1.   
On 11 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


EQT Fund Management S.à r.l. (‘EFMS’, Luxembourg), controlled by EQT AB (Sweden),










—


Molslinjen A/S (‘Molslinjen’, Denmark)




EFMS acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Molslinjen.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for EFMS: managing EQT Infrastructure V, an investment fund in infrastructure and infrastructure related assets and businesses primarily in Europe and North America.










—


for Molslinjen: operating ferry routes within Denmark and between Denmark and Sweden / Germany.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10120—EQT/Molslinjen
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-34/20: Order of the General Court of 18 January 2021 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Software solutions for universities — Tax advantages and public funding — Formal investigation procedure — Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid — Lack of individual concern — No regulatory act — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, control of State aid, software, tax exemption, tax relief, university








C_2021079EN.01003101.xml










8.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/31






Order of the General Court of 18 January 2021 — Datenlotsen Informationssysteme v Commission
(Case T-34/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Software solutions for universities - Tax advantages and public funding - Formal investigation procedure - Decision classifying the implemented measures as existing aid - Lack of individual concern - No regulatory act - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 79/40)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Lübbig, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2020/391 of 20 September 2019 on the measure SA.34402 — 2015/C (ex 2015/NN) implemented by Germany for Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH (OJ 2020 L 74, p. 22).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


The application by the Federal Republic of Germany for leave to intervene in support of the European Commission has become devoid of purpose.










3.


Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 77, 9.3.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 15 January 2021 2021/C 18/06
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021018EN.01000601.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 18/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

15 January 2021
(2021/C 18/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2123 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,74 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4393 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88998 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1305 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0770 




ISK


Iceland króna


156,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,3135 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,163 




HUF


Hungarian forint


359,99 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5375 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8733 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,0179 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5680 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5413 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4005 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6896 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6105 




KRW


South Korean won


1 333,60 




ZAR


South African rand


18,4627 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8499 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5535 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 032,57 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8939 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,226 




RUB


Russian rouble


89,0364 




THB


Thai baht


36,411 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3697 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,0231 




INR


Indian rupee


88,6365 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-380/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 18 January 2021 — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: crew, private international law, residence, social security legislation, social-security harmonisation








C_2021349EN.01002301.xml










30.8.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy) lodged on 18 January 2021 — Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Ryanair DAC
(Case C-380/21)
(2021/C 349/29)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte Suprema di Cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS)

Respondent: Ryanair DAC

Question referred

Can the concept of a person ‘employed principally in the territory of the Member State in which he resides’ contained in Article 14(2)(a)(ii) [of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, (1) as amended] be interpreted in the same way as that which (concerning judicial cooperation in civil matters, jurisdiction and individual contracts of employment (Regulation (EC) No 44/2001) (2)) Article 19(2)(a) [of the latter Regulation] defines as the ‘place where the employee habitually carries out his work’, including in the aviation and airline crew sector (Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91), (3) as expressed in the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union referred to in the grounds?


(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).

(3)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation (OJ 1991 L 373, p. 4).
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 18/12
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: European Economic Area, Finland, Norway, Sweden, economic concentration, intelligent transport system, investment company, merger control, provision of services








C_2021018EN.01004201.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 18/42






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 18/12)

1.   
On 7 January 2021, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Francisco Partners (USA);










—


Marlin Equity Partners (USA).




Francisco Partners and Marlin Equity Partners acquire within the meaning of Articles 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Conan Holdco AS (the ‘JV Company’, Norway). The JV Company will combine the activities of Consignor, a Norwegian company currently under sole control of Francisco Partners, and Unifaun, a Swedish company currently under sole control of Marlin Equity Partners.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Francisco Partners: global private equity firm focused on investing in technology and technology enabled businesses;










—


for Marlin Equity Partners: global investment firm with interests in a portfolio of businesses, including software and technology;










—


for the JV Company: provision of Transportation Administration Systems (‘TAS’) services in various EEA countries, including Sweden, Finland and Norway.






3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10060 — Francisco Partners/Marlin Equity Partners/Conan Holdco
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case C-29/21 P: Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-574/19, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO
Date: 2021-01-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: designs and models, toy industry, tube








C_2021252EN.01000602.xml










28.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/6






Appeal brought on 18 January 2021 by Tinnus Enterprises LLC against the judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2020 in Case T-574/19, Tinnus Enterprises v EUIPO
(Case C-29/21 P)
(2021/C 252/09)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Tinnus Enterprises LLC (represented by: A. Odle and R. Palijama, advocaten)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 5 May 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Tinnus Enterprises LLC should bear its own costs.