do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-393/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Plovdiv — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against OM (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to property — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Right to an effective remedy — Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA — Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property — Directive 2014/42/EU — Freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union — National legislation providing for the confiscation, for the benefit of the State, of property used to commit the offence of smuggling — Property belonging to a third party acting in good faith)
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: confiscation of property, illicit trade, offence, ownership, right to justice, seizure of goods








C_2021079EN.01000801.xml










8.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/8






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad — Plovdiv — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against OM
(Case C-393/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to property - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Right to an effective remedy - Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA - Confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property - Directive 2014/42/EU - Freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the European Union - National legislation providing for the confiscation, for the benefit of the State, of property used to commit the offence of smuggling - Property belonging to a third party acting in good faith)
(2021/C 79/09)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Apelativen sad — Plovdiv

Party in the main criminal proceedings

OM

Interveners in the main criminal proceedings: Okrazhna prokuratura — Haskovo, Apelativna prokuratura — Plovdiv

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005 on Confiscation of Crime-Related Proceeds, Instrumentalities and Property, read in the light of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as precluding a national law which permits the confiscation of an instrumentality used to commit an aggravated smuggling offence where that property belongs to a third party acting in good faith;










2.


Article 4 of Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA, read in the light of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, must be interpreted as precluding a national law which permits the confiscation, in the context of criminal proceedings, of property belonging to a person other than the person who committed the criminal offence, without the former being afforded an effective remedy.






(1)  OJ C 295, 2.9.2019.
Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2021/58 of 14 January 2021 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2021)
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: EU police mission, Mali, Sahel, peacekeeping








L_2021026EN.01000101.xml










26.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 26/1








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2021/58
of 14 January 2021
         
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/1/2021)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (1), and in particular Article 7(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 7(1) of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of EUCAP Sahel Mali, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.












(2)


On 8 December 2020, the PSC adopted Decision (CFSP) 2020/2199 (2), appointing Mr Hervé FLAHAUT as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 1 January 2021 to 14 January 2021.












(3)


On 7 January 2021, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2021/14 (3), extending the mandate of EUCAP Sahel Mali until 31 January 2023.












(4)


The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed to extend the mandate of Mr Hervé FLAHAUT as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2021 to 14 January 2022,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Hervé FLAHAUT as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Mali is hereby extended until 14 January 2022.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.
It shall apply from 15 January 2021.




Done at Brussels, 14 January 2021.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

S. FROM-EMMESBERGER
            





(1)  
            OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21.

(2)  Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2020/2199 of 8 December 2020 on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (EUCAP Sahel Mali/2/2020) (OJ L 434, 23.12.2020, p. 54).

(3)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/14 of 7 January 2021 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 5, 8.1.2021, p. 16).
Case C-280/19 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021 — European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) v Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Minatran contract concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme — Eligible costs — Debit note issued by the ERCEA — Recovery of amounts advanced — Personnel costs and indirect expenditure relating to those personnel costs — Obligation to carry out work solely on the premises of the beneficiary of the grant — Supervision by the beneficiary — Normal practices of the beneficiary)
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Framework Programme for Research and Development, debt, eligibility criteria, research and development, wage cost








C_2021072EN.01000501.xml










1.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/5






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021 — European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) v Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis
(Case C-280/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Minatran contract concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme - Eligible costs - Debit note issued by the ERCEA - Recovery of amounts advanced - Personnel costs and indirect expenditure relating to those personnel costs - Obligation to carry out work solely on the premises of the beneficiary of the grant - Supervision by the beneficiary - Normal practices of the beneficiary)
(2021/C 72/06)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) (represented by: F. Sgritta and M. Pesquera Alonso, acting as Agents, and by E.Κourakis, dikigoros)

Other party to the proceedings: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10021 — Netcompany/Copenhagen Airports/SMARTER AIRPORTS JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 21/02
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: airport, economic concentration, information technology, merger control, provision of services








C_2021021EN.01000201.xml










20.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 21/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10021 — Netcompany/Copenhagen Airports/SMARTER AIRPORTS JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 21/02)
On 14 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10021. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 15/03
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission
Subjects: Eastern Finland, Finland, Lapland, Oulu, Southern Finland, Western Finland, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2021015EN.01000301.xml










14.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 15/3






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Establishment of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 15/03)






Member State


Finland




Routes concerned


Helsinki – Joensuu
Helsinki – Jyväskylä
Helsinki – Kajaani
Helsinki – Kemi
Helsinki – Kokkola




Date of entry into force of public service obligations


1 April 2021




Address from which the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge







Further information: Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom)




Address:




PO Box 320




FI-00059 Traficom




FINLAND




Email: kirjaamo@traficom.fi
Internet: http://www.traficom.fi/en/transport/aviation/air-public-service-obligations
Case C-892/19 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021 — Camelia Manéa v CdT (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Civil service — Member of the temporary staff — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew the contract — Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision — Action for annulment and for damages — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, servant (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment








C_2021138EN.01001501.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/15






Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 January 2021 — Camelia Manéa v CdT
(Case C-892/19 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Civil service - Member of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew the contract - Withdrawal of the decision and adoption of a new decision refusing renewal with effect from the date of the first decision - Action for annulment and for damages - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2021/C 138/19)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Camelia Manéa (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) (represented by: M. Garnier and J. Rikkert, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, avocat)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.










2.


Ms Camelia Manéa shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 11.5.2020.
Case C-108/19: Order of the Court (Tenth chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucaresti — Romania) — Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 33 — Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out — Supply of goods with transport — Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier — Sale through a website — Contract for the carriage of goods concluded by the buyer with a company suggested by the supplier)
Date: 2021-01-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, carriage of goods, contract of carriage, electronic commerce, retail outlet, supply








C_2021138EN.01001301.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/13






Order of the Court (Tenth chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucaresti — Romania) — Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k. v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi
(Case C-108/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 33 - Determination of the place where taxable transactions are carried out - Supply of goods with transport - Supply of goods dispatched or transported by or on behalf of the supplier - Sale through a website - Contract for the carriage of goods concluded by the buyer with a company suggested by the supplier)
(2021/C 138/16)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Krakvet sp. z o.o. sp.k.

Defendants: Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti, Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Nerezidenţi

Operative part of the order

Article 33 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, as regards goods sold through a website by a supplier established in a Member State to buyers located in another Member State, when, for the purposes of delivering those goods, those buyers, in accordance with the dispatching options offered by the supplier, choose a company suggested by that website with which they conclude a contract separate from the one which bounds them to that supplier for the purchase of those goods, the latter must be regarded as transported ‘by or on behalf of the supplier’, within the meaning of Article 33, where the role of that supplier is predominant in terms of initiating and organising the essential stages of the transport of those goods, which it is for the referring court to ascertain, taking account of all the relevant circumstances of the dispute in the main proceedings.


(1)  OJ C 172, 20.5.2019.