do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Euro exchange rates – 29 December 2020 (Official Journal of the European Union C 452 of 30 December 2020) 2021/C 3/08
Date: 2021-01-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2021003EN.01000801.xml










6.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/8






Corrigendum to Euro exchange rates – 29 December 2020

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 452 of 30 December 2020
)

(2021/C 3/08)
The euro exchange rates table on page 3 should read as follows:

‘1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2259 




JPY


Japanese yen


127,23 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4382 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90863 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,0840 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0862 




ISK


Iceland króna


156,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5500 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,302 




HUF


Hungarian forint


364,53 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5308 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8757 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,0177 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6121 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5713 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,5043 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7171 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6274 




KRW


South Korean won


1 340,33 




ZAR


South African rand


17,9651 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0070 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5447 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 305,60 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9655 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,903 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,1883 




THB


Thai baht


36,826 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3717 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,4001 




INR


Indian rupee


89,9420 ’
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10041 — PAI/Addo/ComplEat) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 12/01
Date: 2021-01-06
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: bakery, economic concentration, food production, investment company, meat processing industry, merger control, processed food product, supply








C_2021012EN.01000101.xml










12.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 12/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10041 — PAI/Addo/ComplEat)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 12/01)
On 6 January 2021, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32021M10041. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-5/21 P: Appeal brought on 6 January 2021 by Deutsche Post AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 November 2020 in Case T-25/20, Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn)
Date: 2021-01-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, carriage of goods, correspondence, logistics, packaging, postal service, registered trade mark, storage, trade-mark law








C_2021242EN.01000201.xml










21.6.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 242/2






Appeal brought on 6 January 2021 by Deutsche Post AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 11 November 2020 in Case T-25/20, Deutsche Post v EUIPO — Pošta Slovenije (Representation of a stylised horn)
(Case C-5/21 P)
(2021/C 242/02)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Deutsche Post AG (represented by: M. Viefhues, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Pošta Slovenije d.o.o.
By order of 5 May 2021, the Court of Justice (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) held that the appeal was not allowed to proceed and that Deutsche Post AG should bear its own costs.