do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-766/20: Action brought on 23 December 2020 — PrenzMarien v EUIPO — Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) (STONES)
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beer, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021062EN.01004001.xml










22.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 62/40






Action brought on 23 December 2020 — PrenzMarien v EUIPO — Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) (STONES)
(Case T-766/20)
(2021/C 62/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: PrenzMarien GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: M. Kloth, R. Briske and D. Habel, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Ltd (Burton Upon Trent, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark STONES — European Union trade mark No 8 810 707

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2020 in Case R 274/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and revoke the contested European Union trade mark in its entirety;










—


make an award of costs in favour of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Articles 19(1) and 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10034 — Pizarreño/Maderas Arauco/E2E JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 447/07
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, economic concentration, merger control, wood industry








C_2020447EN.01001701.xml










23.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 447/17






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.10034 — Pizarreño/Maderas Arauco/E2E JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 447/07)

1.   
On 15 December 2020, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Empresas Pizarreño S.A. (‘Pizarreño’, Chile), controlled by Etex N.V. (Belgium),










—


Maderas Arauco S.A. (‘Maderas Arauco’, Chile), controlled by Inversiones Angelini y Compañia Limitada (Chile),










—


E2E S.A. (‘E2E’, Chile), jointly controlled by Empresas Pizarreño and Maderas Arauco.




Pizarreño and Maderas Arauco extend the product and geographic scope of their pilot joint venture, E2E, by means of a transfer of rights. As a result, E2E becomes an autonomous economic entity within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Pizarreño: manufacture, distribution and marketing of finished construction products, using cement and plaster or colpa,










—


for Maderas Arauco: manufacture and sale of wood and forest products, namely fiberboard panels, plywood and sawn timber, as well as operation of sawmills in Chile, Argentina, Brazil, the United States, Canada and Mexico,










—


for E2E: development, manufacture, assembly, installation of 2D panelized or 3D modular units.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.10034 — Pizarreño/Maderas Arauco/E2E JV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:
Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu
Fax +32 22964301
Postal address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 22 December 2020 2020/C 447/02
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020447EN.01000401.xml










23.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 447/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

22 December 2020
(2020/C 447/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2239 




JPY


Japanese yen


126,52 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4401 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,91148 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1143 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0837 




ISK


Iceland króna


156,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5938 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,303 




HUF


Hungarian forint


362,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,5116 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8665 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,3325 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6191 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5753 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4885 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7299 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6327 




KRW


South Korean won


1 353,44 




ZAR


South African rand


17,8544 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0056 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5420 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 410,10 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9703 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,870 




RUB


Russian rouble


92,2025 




THB


Thai baht


36,901 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,2842 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,4948 




INR


Indian rupee


90,3975 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-769/20: Action brought on 23 December 2020 — Ryanair v Commission
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, aid for restructuring, air transport, borrowing, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic, freedom to provide services, right of establishment








C_2021062EN.01004201.xml










22.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 62/42






Action brought on 23 December 2020 — Ryanair v Commission
(Case T-769/20)
(2021/C 62/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating and I. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the European Commission’s decision C(2020) 5616 final of 11 August 2020 on State Aid SA.57586 (2020/N) — Estonia COVID-19: Recapitalisation and subsidised interest loan for Nordica;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the European Commission misapplied Article 107(3)(b) TFEU and its Temporary framework for State aid measures to support the economy in the current COVID-19 outbreak by finding that the aid addresses a serious disturbance in the Estonian economy, that Nordica is eligible to aid, and that the conditions regarding distortions to competition, the State’s exit and restructuring were satisfied, and by violating its obligation to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition (i.e., the ‘balancing test’).










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the European Commission violated specific provisions of the TFEU and the general principles of European law regarding the prohibition of discrimination, free provision of services and free establishment that have underpinned the liberalisation of air transport in the EU since the late 1980s.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the European Commission failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the European Commission violated its duty to state reasons.
Case C-704/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 23 December 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: asylum seeker, detention before trial, foreign national, fundamental rights, illegal migration, judicial review, return migration, right of asylum








C_2021128EN.01001002.xml










12.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 23 December 2020 — Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v C, B
(Case C-704/20)
(2021/C 128/14)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid

Respondents: C, B

Question referred

Does European Union law, more particularly Article 15(2) of the Return Directive (2008/115/EC; OJ 2008 L 348) (1) and Article 9 of the Reception Directive (2013/33/EU; OJ 2013 L 180), (2) read in conjunction with Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2007 C 303/01), require a court of its own motion (ex officio) to assess whether all the conditions pertaining to detention have been met, including those where the foreign national has not disputed that compliance occurred, despite having had the opportunity to do so?


(1)  Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98).

(2)  Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9982 — Ford/GFT) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 6/02
Date: 2020-12-23
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: commercial vehicle, economic concentration, electric vehicle, financial services, luxury products industry, merger control, motor car, motor vehicle industry, vehicle parts








C_2021006EN.01000401.xml










8.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 6/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9982 — Ford/GFT)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 6/02)
On 23 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9982. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.