Case C-808/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020 — European Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Area of freedom, security and justice — Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration — Directives 2008/115/EC, 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU — Procedure for granting international protection — Effective access — Border procedure — Procedural safeguards — Compulsory placement in transit zones — Detention — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Appeals brought against administrative decisions rejecting the application for international protection — Right to remain in the territory)
Date: 2020-12-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, Serbia, asylum seeker, external border of the EU, foreign national, infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, return migration, right of asylum, stateless person








C_2021053EN.01000301.xml










15.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/3






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 December 2020 — European Commission v Hungary
(Case C-808/18) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Area of freedom, security and justice - Policies on border checks, asylum and immigration - Directives 2008/115/EC, 2013/32/EU and 2013/33/EU - Procedure for granting international protection - Effective access - Border procedure - Procedural safeguards - Compulsory placement in transit zones - Detention - Return of illegally staying third-country nationals - Appeals brought against administrative decisions rejecting the application for international protection - Right to remain in the territory)
(2021/C 53/03)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Condou-Durande, A. Tokár and J. Tomkin, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and by M.M. Tátrai, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5, Article 6(1), Article 12(1) and Article 13(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, under Article 6, Article 24(3), Article 43 and Article 46(5) of Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection, and under Articles 8, 9 and 11 of Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection:






—


in providing that applications for international protection from third-country nationals or stateless persons who, arriving from Serbia, wish to access, in its territory, the international protection procedure, may be made only in the transit zones of Röszke (Hungary) and Tompa (Hungary), while adopting a consistent and generalised administrative practice drastically limiting the number of applicants authorised to enter those transit zones daily;










—


in establishing a system of systematic detention of applicants for international protection in the transit zones of Röszke and Tompa, without observing the guarantees provided for in Article 24(3) and Article 43 of Directive 2013/32 and Articles 8, 9 and 11 of Directive 2013/33;










—


in allowing the removal of all third-country nationals staying illegally in its territory, with the exception of those of them who are suspected of having committed a criminal offence, without observing the procedures and safeguards laid down in Article 5, Article 6(1), Article 12(1) and Article 13(1) of Directive 2008/115;










—


in making the exercise by applicants for international protection who fall within the scope of Article 46(5) of Directive 2013/32 of their right to remain in its territory subject to conditions contrary to EU law;














2.


The action is dismissed as to the remainder;










3.


Hungary is to bear its own costs and pay four fifths of the costs of the European Commission;










4.


The European Commission is to bear one fifth of its costs.






(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.