do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 11 December 2020 2020/C 432/06
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020432EN.01000601.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/6






Euro exchange rates (1)

11 December 2020
(2020/C 432/06)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2127 




JPY


Japanese yen


126,28 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4429 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,92294 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2560 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0786 




ISK


Iceland króna


154,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,6968 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,328 




HUF


Hungarian forint


354,81 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4358 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8698 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,5678 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6090 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5487 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,3999 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7100 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6213 




KRW


South Korean won


1 325,32 




ZAR


South African rand


18,3435 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9386 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5375 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 074,82 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,9133 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,339 




RUB


Russian rouble


88,7373 




THB


Thai baht


36,496 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,1448 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,4157 




INR


Indian rupee


89,4705 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-393/18: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — Mellifera v Commission
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative order, biodiversity, environmental protection, herbicide, market approval








C_2021053EN.01006701.xml










15.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/67






Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — Mellifera v Commission
(Case T-393/18) (1)

(2021/C 53/84)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10014 — LGP/Centerbridge/Community Psychiatry) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 3/01
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, medical centre, merger control, psychiatry, service








C_2021003EN.01000101.xml










6.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 3/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10014 — LGP/Centerbridge/Community Psychiatry)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 3/01)
On 14 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10014. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-724/20: Action brought on 14 December 2020 — Senseon Tech v EUIPO — Accuride International (SENSEON)
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, information security, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2021044EN.01005301.xml










8.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/53






Action brought on 14 December 2020 — Senseon Tech v EUIPO — Accuride International (SENSEON)
(Case T-724/20)
(2021/C 44/76)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Senseon Tech Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Andreottola and M. Li Trenta, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Accuride International Inc. (Santa Fe Springs, California, United States)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SENSEON — Application for registration No 17 758 831

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 September 2020 in Case R 2736/2019-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


uphold the applicant’s appeal against the contested decision in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs of the applicant.





Pleas in law







—


Error in the assessment of the relevant public;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the determination of similarity of goods and services;










—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in relation to the overall assessment.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9968 — TOTAL/Ørsted UK) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 34/04
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, gas industry, gas supply, merger control, oil industry, petrochemicals, retail trade








C_2021034EN.01000401.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 34/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9968 — TOTAL/Ørsted UK)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 34/04)
On 14 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9968 — TOTAL/Ørsted UK. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2020 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the recovery and resolution of central counterparties and amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 600/2014, (EU) No 806/2014 and (EU) 2015/2365 and Directives 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2014/59/EU and (EU) 2017/1132 (09644/1/2020 — C9-0376/2020 — 2016/0365(COD))
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: company in difficulties, financial institution, financial instrument, financial intervention, financial legislation, financial services, financial solvency, financial transaction








C_2021445EN.01021301.xml










29.10.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 445/213






P9_TA(2020)0338
Framework for the recovery and resolution of central counterparties ***II
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 December 2020 on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a framework for the recovery and resolution of central counterparties and amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, (EU) No 648/2012, (EU) No 600/2014, (EU) No 806/2014 and (EU) 2015/2365 and Directives 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2014/59/EU and (EU) 2017/1132 (09644/1/2020 — C9-0376/2020 — 2016/0365(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)
(2021/C 445/26)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council position at first reading (09644/1/2020 — C9-0376/2020),










—


having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 29 March 2017 (1),










—


having regard to its position at first reading (2) on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2016)0856),










—


having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,










—


having regard to the provisional agreement approved by the committee responsible under Rule 74(4) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to Rule 67 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A9-0242/2020),












1.


Approves the Council position at first reading;












2.


Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;












3.


Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.






(1)  OJ C 209, 30.6.2017, p. 28.

(2)  Texts adopted, P8_TA(2019)0301.
Decision No 19-2020 of the court of auditors of 14 December 2020 regarding the amendment of Article 19 of its Rules of Procedure
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Court of Auditors, decision-making, rules of procedure




L_2020434EN.01006601.xml










23.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 434/66








            DECISION No 19-2020 OF THE COURT OF AUDITORS
         
of 14 December 2020
         
regarding the amendment of Article 19 of its Rules of Procedure


THE COURT OF AUDITORS,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth subparagraph of Article 287(4) thereof,


Having regard to the approval of the Council given on 23 November 2020,

Whereas:







(1)


The Rules of Procedure of the Court of Auditors (Court) do not provide for the possibility for the Court to adopt its decisions remotely, namely, by means of video or telephone conference, in exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure.












(2)


In order to enable the Court to adopt its decisions remotely in exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure, and to ensure the continuity of decision-making by the Court in such circumstances, it is necessary to amend its Rules of Procedure,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 19 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Auditors is hereby replaced by the following:


‘Article 19
Decision-making procedure

1.   The Court shall adopt its decisions in formal session, save where it applies the written procedure laid down in Article 25(5).


2.   In duly justified and exceptional circumstances which constitute force majeure, in particular, major public health crises, natural disasters or acts of terrorism, determined by the President, the Court may adopt its decisions in formal session, by means of a remote meeting, namely by video or telephone conference, in which Members may participate either at the Court or at another location. The President shall call and chair such meetings and be responsible for their proper conduct. The written procedure laid down in Article 25(5) shall apply mutatis mutandis.


3.   Paragraph 2 shall apply to meetings of the Chambers and of the Committees. The Dean or Chairperson of the respective Chamber or Committee shall call and chair such meetings and be responsible for their proper conduct.


4.   Decisions provided for in Articles 4(4), 7(2) and 13(1), which are taken by secret ballot, may be adopted by the Court in a remote meeting under paragraph 2 of this Article, provided that the secrecy of the vote is ensured.’.





Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 14 December 2020.


For the Court of Auditors

Klaus-Heiner LEHNE
            

President
Case T-728/20: Action brought on 14 December 2020 — OM v Commission
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, health expenditure, rights of the defence








C_2021053EN.01004701.xml










15.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/47






Action brought on 14 December 2020 — OM v Commission
(Case T-728/20)
(2021/C 53/63)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: OM (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should






—


annul the decision rejecting requests for reimbursement 247-251 and 252-256;










—


annul the decision of 23 March 2020 rejecting the complaint;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant invokes first of all the admissibility of her action against a decision notified through the rejection, dated 23 March 2020, of her complaint made on 5 December 2019, which the applicant considers to be a new decision, adopted on the basis of a new examination of her situation, after the administration accepted the main argument developed through her first complaint. As regards the substance, the applicant relies on four pleas in law:






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the decisions are contradictory in relation to the change in reasoning following the previous reimbursement of similar expenses.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the lack of a specific and thorough examination of the requests for reimbursement of the medical expenses at issue.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the right to be heard.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment of the file.
Case T-255/20: Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — ClientEarth v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Comitology — Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles — Agenda for the 79th meeting of the committee — Right to information applicable in the Member States of the European Union as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles — Implied refusal of access — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, decision-making, light-duty vehicle, motor car, motor vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, provision of documents, right to information, technical committee (EU)








C_2021053EN.01004201.xml










15.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/42






Order of the General Court of 14 December 2020 — ClientEarth v Commission
(Case T-255/20) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Comitology - Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles - Agenda for the 79th meeting of the committee - Right to information applicable in the Member States of the European Union as regards emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles - Implied refusal of access - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 53/56)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ClientEarth AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Logue, Solicitor, and J. Kenny, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, C. Ehrbar and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission of 26 February 2020 refusing to grant access to certain parts of the minutes of the 79th meeting of the Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles of 12 February 2019.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The European Commission shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 247, 27.7.2020.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10018 – ifm electronic/Endress+ Hauser Group Services/Automation24/Process+Lab Devices Online) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 455/01
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: automation, distributor, economic concentration, electronic commerce, information technology industry, merger control, provision of services








C_2021455EN.01000101.xml










10.11.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 455/1







Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10018 – ifm electronic/Endress+ Hauser Group Services/Automation24/Process+Lab Devices Online)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 455/01)

On 14 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10018. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Communication from the Commission concerning the entry into force of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2020/C 432/01
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Directorate-General for Climate Action, European Commission
Subjects: Kyoto Protocol, adaptation to climate change, agreement (EU), air quality, climate change, greenhouse gas, reduction of gas emissions, revision of an agreement








C_2020432EN.01000101.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/1






COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION
concerning the entry into force of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
(2020/C 432/01)
The Union approved the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change on 13 July 2015 (1).
According to Article 20, paragraph 4, and Article 21, paragraph 7 of the Kyoto Protocol, the amendment shall enter into force for those Parties having accepted it on the ninetieth day after the date of receipt by the Depositary of an instrument of acceptance by at least three fourths of the Parties to the Protocol. On 2 October 2020, the hundred forty fourth instrument of acceptance was deposited at the Secretary General of the United Nations acting as the Depositary of the Kyoto Protocol. Accordingly, the Doha Amendment will enter into force for the European Union on 31 December 2020.


(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/1339 of 13 July 2015 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the joint fulfilment of commitments thereunder (OJ L 207, 4.8.2015, p. 1).
Case C-467/20: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 14 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — BC v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, airport, carrier, civil aviation, indemnification, reservation, third country, transport regulations, traveller








C_2021079EN.01002802.xml










8.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 79/28






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 14 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — BC v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
(Case C-467/20) (1)

(2021/C 79/36)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court of Justice has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 433, 14.12.2020.
Council Decision (EU) 2020/2136 of 14 December 2020 adopting the Council’s position on the second draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021
Date: 2020-12-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU), financial year, general budget (EU)








L_2020430EN.01001401.xml










18.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 430/14








            COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2020/2136
of 14 December 2020
         
adopting the Council’s position on the second draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314(3) thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 10 December 2020, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the second draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 (1).












(2)


The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom of 26 May 2014 on the system of own resources of the European Union (2), and, on the expenditure side, with the contents of the agreement in principle reached on 10 November 2020 on the multiannual financial framework 2021-2027.












(3)


Given the need to adopt a Council position on the second draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 as soon as possible with a view to a budget being definitively adopted before the beginning of the financial year 2021, thus ensuring the continuity of the Union’s action, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, the eight-week period for the information of National Parliaments laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1,





HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:



Sole Article
The Council’s position on the second draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2021 was adopted by the Council on 14 December 2020.
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/




Done at Brussels, 14 December 2020.


For the Council


The President

M. ROTH
            





(1)  COM(2020) 839 final.

(2)  
            OJ L 168, 7.6.2014, p. 39.