do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-712/20: Action brought on 3 December 2020 — Škoda Investement v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Device of arrow with wing)
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, insurance, maintenance, motor vehicle industry, organisation of transport, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2021035EN.01005701.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/57






Action brought on 3 December 2020 — Škoda Investement v EUIPO — Škoda Auto (Device of arrow with wing)
(Case T-712/20)
(2021/C 35/75)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Škoda Investement a.s. (Plzeň, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Škoda Auto a.s. (Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark (Representation of a device of arrow with wing) — Application for registration No 17 991 861

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2020 in Case R 284/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 9 December 2019 concerning Opposition No B003083007 to the full extent;










—


remit the case to the Opposition Division for further examination with respect to all goods and services applied for;










—


order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Incorrect assessment of the legal effects of a procedurally illegal first-instance decision.
Public holidays in 2021: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions 2020/C 418/07
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: EEA joint institution, EFTA countries, public holiday








C_2020418EN.01000701.xml










3.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 418/7






Public holidays in 2021: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions
(2020/C 418/07)










 


Iceland


Liechtenstein


Norway


EFTA Surveillance Authority


EFTA Court




Friday 1 January


X


X


X


X


X




Monday 4 January


 


 


 


X


 




Tuesday 5 January


 


 


 


X


 




Wednesday 6 January


 


X


 


X


 




Thursday 7 January


 


 


 


X


 




Friday 8 January


 


 


 


X


 




Tuesday 2 February


 


X


 


 


 




Monday 15 February


 


 


 


 


X




Tuesday 16 February


 


X


 


 


 




Friday 19 March


 


X


 


 


 




Thursday 1 April


X


 


X


X


X




Friday 2 April


X


X


X


X


X




Monday 5 April


X


X


X


X


X




Thursday 22 April


X


 


 


 


 




Thursday 13 May


X


X


X


X


X




Friday 14 May


 


 


 


X


X




Monday 17 May


 


 


X


 


 




Monday 24 May


X


X


X


X


X




Thursday 3 June


 


X


 


 


 




Monday 17 June


X


 


 


 


 




Wednesday 23 June


 


 


 


 


X




Monday 2 August


X


 


 


 


 




Monday 30 August


 


 


 


 


X




Wednesday 8 September


 


X


 


 


 




Monday 1 November


 


X


 


X


X




Tuesday 2 November


 


 


 


 


X




Wednesday 8 December


 


X


 


 


 




Friday 24 December


X


X


 


X


X




Monday 27 December


 


 


 


X


X




Tuesday 28 December


 


 


 


X


X




Wednesday 29 December


 


 


 


X


X




Thursday 30 December


 


 


 


X


X




Friday 31 December


X


X


 


X


X




**Public holidays falling on Saturdays and Sundays are not listed.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10056 — PSPIB/TTishman Speyer/Carré Saint Germain) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 425/02
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Ile-de-France, business lease, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, real property








C_2020425EN.01000201.xml










9.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10056 — PSPIB/TTishman Speyer/Carré Saint Germain)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 425/02)
On 3 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10056. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10031 — FSI/WTI/MEL) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 428/01
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy industry, energy production, investment company, merger control, waste incineration








C_2020428EN.01000101.xml










11.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10031 — FSI/WTI/MEL)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 428/01)
On 3 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10031. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10025 — SKN/Lother Group/NORDTEAM JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 432/03
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, lubricants, merger control, mineral oil, oil industry








C_2020432EN.01000301.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10025 — SKN/Lother Group/NORDTEAM JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 432/03)
On 3 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10025. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-44/19: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Repsol Petróleo SA v Administracíon General del Estado (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 21(3) — Absence of chargeable event giving rise to taxation — Consumption of energy products within the curtilage of an establishment in which they were produced for the production of final energy products from which non-energy products are also inevitably produced)
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: energy consumption, energy production, environmental tax, excise duty, mineral oil, tax exemption








C_2021035EN.01000502.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/5






Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Repsol Petróleo SA v Administracíon General del Estado
(Case C-44/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/96/EC - Taxation of energy products and electricity - Article 21(3) - Absence of chargeable event giving rise to taxation - Consumption of energy products within the curtilage of an establishment in which they were produced for the production of final energy products from which non-energy products are also inevitably produced)
(2021/C 35/06)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Repsol Petróleo SA

Defendant: Administracíon General del Estado

Operative part of the judgment

The first sentence of Article 21(3) of Council Directive 2003/93/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity must be interpreted as meaning that, where an establishment producing energy products intended for use as motor fuel or as heating fuel consumes energy products which it has itself produced and that, by that process, also inevitably obtains non-energy products from which economic value is derived, the portion of the consumption leading to the production of such non-energy products does not fall within the exemption concerning the chargeable event giving rise to the taxation of energy products provided for in that provision.


(1)  OJ C 155, 6.5.2019.
State aid – Decision to raise no objections 2020/C 418/06
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: EFTA Surveillance Authority
Subjects: European Economic Area, Iceland, State aid, aid to undertakings, airline, control of State aid, coronavirus disease, epidemic








C_2020418EN.01000601.xml










3.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 418/6






State aid – Decision to raise no objections
(2020/C 418/06)
The EFTA Surveillance Authority raises no objections to the following state aid measure:






Date of adoption of the decision


26 August 2020




Case No


85190




Decision No


101/20/COL




EFTA State


Iceland




Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)


Compensation to Icelandair for the damage caused by the COVID-19 outbreak




Legal basis


Supplementary budget Act.
The terms and conditions of the state guarantee will be set out in an agreement between the Treasury and Icelandair.




Type of measure


Ad hoc aid




Objective


To compensate Icelandair for damage suffered due to the cancellation or re-scheduling of its flights, as a result of the imposition of travel restrictions by Iceland and other countries, linked to the COVID-19 outbreak




Form of aid


State guarantee




Budget


USD 108 million




Intensity


100 %




Duration


September 2020 to September 2025




Economic sectors


Aviation




Name and address of the granting authority







The Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs




Arnarhvoli við Lindargötu




101 Reykjavík




ICELAND








The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found on the EFTA Surveillance Authority’s website: http://www.eftasurv.int/state-aid/state-aid-register/decisions/
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10022 — Premier Oil/Chrysaor Holdings) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 425/01
Date: 2020-12-03
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, extraction of oil, gas industry, merger control, petroleum








C_2020425EN.01000101.xml










9.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 425/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10022 — Premier Oil/Chrysaor Holdings)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 425/01)
On 3 December 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10022. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.