do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-649/20 P: Appeal brought on 1 December 2020 by the Kingdom of Spain against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 23 September 2020 in Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV, Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission
Date: 2020-12-01
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Economic Interest Grouping, State aid, control of State aid, hire purchase, reimbursement of aid, tax system, vessel








C_2021110EN.01001302.xml










29.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 110/13






Appeal brought on 1 December 2020 by the Kingdom of Spain against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 23 September 2020 in Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV, Kingdom of Spain and Others v European Commission

(Case C-649/20 P)
(2021/C 110/13)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta and S. Jiménez García, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020, Kingdom of Spain and Others v Commission, in Joined Cases T-515/13 RENV and T-719/13 RENV, EU:T:2020:434;










—


annul Commission Decision 2014/200/EU of 17 July 2013 on the aid scheme SA.21233 C/11 (ex NN/11, ex CP 137/06) implemented by Spain — Tax scheme applicable to certain finance lease agreements also known as the Spanish Tax Lease System; (1)











—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments







1.


The General Court infringed Article 47 of the Charter, read in conjunction with Article 256 TFEU, for failure to give a statement of reasons with regard to the analysis of selectivity under Article 107(1) TFEU and the principles of cost recovery.










2.


The General Court erred in law in the interpretation of Article 107(1) TFEU, concerning the selectivity of the measure.










3.


The General Court erred in law in the interpretation and application of the principles of legitimate expectations and legal certainty, in the context of the monitoring of State aid under Article 108 TFEU, by its method of analysis and by rendering meaningless the content of both principles.










4.


The General Court erred in law in the interpretation and application of the principles applicable to recovery.






(1)  OJ 2014 L 144, p. 1
Case T-486/18: Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Danske Slagtermestre v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water — Preliminary examination stage — Decision finding that there is no State aid — Trade association — Locus standi — Status as an interested party — Objective of protecting the procedural rights guaranteed by Article 108(2) TFEU — Lack of individual concern — No substantial effect on the competitive position — Regulatory act — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2020-12-01
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Denmark, State aid, admissibility, control of State aid, equal treatment, meat processing industry, right of action, size of business, wastewater, water treatment








C_2021028EN.01004802.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/48






Order of the General Court of 1 December 2020 — Danske Slagtermestre v Commission
(Case T-486/18) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Contributions scheme for the collection of waste water - Preliminary examination stage - Decision finding that there is no State aid - Trade association - Locus standi - Status as an interested party - Objective of protecting the procedural rights guaranteed by Article 108(2) TFEU - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Regulatory act - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2021/C 28/74)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Danske Slagtermestre (Odense, Denmark) (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: J. Nymann-Lindegren and M. Wolff, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 2259 final of 19 April 2018 relating to State aid SA.37433 (2017/FC) –Denmark, declaring, after the preliminary examination stage, that the contribution introduced by the lov nr. 902/2013 om ændring af lov om betalingsregler for spildevandsforsyningsselskaber m.v. (Betalingsstruktur for vandafledningsbidrag, bemyndigelse til opgørelse af særbidrag for behandling af særlig forurenet spildevand m.v.) (Law No 902/2013, amending the law establishing the rules relating to contributions owed to waste water treatment operators (structure of the contributions for the drainage of waste water, authorising special contributions for the treatment of particularly polluted waste water)) does not confer an advantage on specific undertakings and does not therefore constitute State Aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Danske Slagtermestre shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










3.


The Kingdom of Denmark shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 381, 22.10.2018.