do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-475/20 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — LE v Commission (Application for interim measures — Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) — Recovery of sums paid — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: debt, eligibility criteria, equal treatment, right to justice, transparency in decision-making








C_2021028EN.01005301.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/53






Order of the President of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — LE v Commission
(Case T-475/20 R)
(Application for interim measures - Grant agreement concluded in the framework of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Recovery of sums paid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
(2021/C 28/82)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: LE (represented by: M. Straus, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application under Article 299 TFEU for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2020) 3988 final of 9 June 2020 establishing an enforceable financial obligation against the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is rejected.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Decision 2020/C 448/03
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: European Parliament
Subjects: European official, appointment of staff, competition (EU), recruitment, staff regulations (EU)




C_2020448EN.01000501.xml










23.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 448/5






Decision
(2020/C 448/03)
THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,
– HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended, in particular, by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (2) and, in particular, Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,
– HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau Decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE),
– HAVING REGARD TO the expiry, on 31 December 2020, of the following European Parliament reserve lists:
PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/186/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), PE/200/S, AST/1/13, AST/1/16 and AST/2/16 (P),
– HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 21 October 2020,
HAS DECIDED:

Sole Article
The period of validity of the following reserve lists:
PE/168/S, PE/171/S, PE/186/S, AD/1/16, AD/2/16 (P), PE/200/S, AST/1/13, AST/1/16 and AST/2/16 (P)
shall be extended until 31 December 2021.


Luxembourg, 27 November 2020.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General





(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.
Case T-702/20: Action brought on 27 November 2020 — Beelow v EUIPO (made of wood)
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2021028EN.01006201.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/62






Action brought on 27 November 2020 — Beelow v EUIPO (made of wood)
(Case T-702/20)
(2021/C 28/92)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Timo Beelow (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark made of wood — Application for registration No 18 061 410

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2020 in Case R 108/2020-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-703/20: Action brought on 27 November 2020 — Mylan Ireland v EMA
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: drug surveillance, generic drug, market approval, marketing standard








C_2021035EN.01005401.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/54






Action brought on 27 November 2020 — Mylan Ireland v EMA
(Case T-703/20)
(2021/C 35/72)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mylan Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: J. Krens, lawyer)

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that a plea of illegality raised by the applicant against the conclusion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use that the Biogen Idec Ltd medicinal product Tecfidera® has a different active substance status resulting in a new global marketing authorisation as quoted in the decision of 30 January 2014 granting marketing authorisation for ‘Tecfidera® — Dimethyl Fumarate’ is admissible and well founded;










—


annul the decision of the EMA of 1 October 2020 not to validate the applicant’s application for a generic version of the medicinal product Tecfidera;










—


order the EMA to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that, the exception of illegality being well-founded, the challenged decision is not legally admissible because the EMA erred in fact and law and failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons and to perform a careful and thorough assessment, as provided under Article 296 TFEU.










2.


Second plea in law, contesting the legality of the challenged decision, given that the ‘different active substance’ status should have been examined again upon the filing of the applicant’s objections, which were submitted during the application phase. Thus, the EMA has failed to perform its duties appropriately, in particular its duty to perform an effective and careful assessment and to state reasons, pursuant to Article 296 TFEU, which in turn renders the challenged decision illegal.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9728 — Altice/OMERS/Allianz/Covage) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 91/03
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: France, Internet access provider, advertising, economic concentration, insurance, investment company, mass media, merger control, mobile communication, transmission network, wholesale trade








C_2021091EN.01003001.xml










18.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 91/30






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9728 — Altice/OMERS/Allianz/Covage)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 91/03)
On 27 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9728. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-728/19: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service — Partial refusal of access — Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, access to EU information, admissibility, reassignment








C_2021028EN.01005001.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/50






Order of the General Court of 27 November 2020 — PL v Commission
(Case T-728/19) (1)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a decision to reassign within the Commission in the interests of the service - Partial refusal of access - Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any legal basis)
(2021/C 28/76)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: PL (represented by: J.-N. Louis and J. Van Rossum, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Vernier, I. Melo Sampaio and C. Ehrbar, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decisions of 13 August and 26 September 2019 refusing in part the disclosure of the documents requested by the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


PL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 19, 20.1.2020.
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 26 November 2020 2020/C 408/04
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020408EN.01000401.xml










27.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 November 2020
(2020/C 408/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1900 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,04 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4420 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89129 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,1568 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0813 




ISK


Iceland króna


161,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,5705 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,138 




HUF


Hungarian forint


361,18 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4749 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8743 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,3878 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6163 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5472 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2235 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7000 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5930 




KRW


South Korean won


1 318,24 




ZAR


South African rand


18,1098 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8254 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5552 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 843,08 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8403 




PHP


Philippine peso


57,257 




RUB


Russian rouble


90,1153 




THB


Thai baht


36,057 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,3494 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,8479 




INR


Indian rupee


87,8655 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Report on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the financial year 2019 2020/C 408/05
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: Council of the European Union, EU banking union, European Commission, appeal to the Court (EU), auditing, bank, economic recession, financial control, financial year, operation of the Institutions








C_2020408EN.01000501.xml










27.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/5






Report on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the financial year 2019
(2020/C 408/05)
The European Court of Auditors will publish its report for the 2019 financial year on any contingent liabilities arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council or the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation together with their replies on 30 November 2020.
The report can be consulted directly or downloaded on 30 November 2020 at the European Court of Auditors’ website: https://www.eca.europa.eu/en/Pages/DocItem.aspx?did=55853
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10013 — Vestas/MHI Vestas JV) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 419/02
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, maintenance, merger control, turbine, wind energy








C_2020419EN.01001201.xml










4.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 419/12






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.10013 — Vestas/MHI Vestas JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 419/02)
On 27 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M10013. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Notice from the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency on the public call for tenders for selection of public service gas supplier, to be published pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 112 of the Gas Market Act (‘Official Gazette’, No 18/18) and paragraph 2 of Article 20 of Amendments to the Gas Market Act (‘Official Gazette’, No 23/20) 2020/C 408/06
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Energy, European Commission
Subjects: Croatia, energy law, gas supply, invitation to tender, public procurement, public service, tendering








C_2020408EN.01000601.xml










27.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/6






Notice from the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency on the public call for tenders for selection of public service gas supplier, to be published pursuant to paragraph 2 of Article 112 of the Gas Market Act (‘Official Gazette’, No 18/18) and paragraph 2 of Article 20 of Amendments to the Gas Market Act (‘Official Gazette’, No 23/20)
(2020/C 408/06)
Public call for tenders for selection of public service gas supplier has been published on 20 October 2020.
The accompanying documentation for the public call for tenders for selection of public service gas supplier has been published on the official website of the Croatian Energy Regulatory Agency (www.hera.hr).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9984 — CIMIC/Elliott/Thiess) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 24/02
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: building industry, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, mining industry








C_2021024EN.01000601.xml










22.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/6






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9984 — CIMIC/Elliott/Thiess)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 24/02)
On 27 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9984. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-38/20: Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 27 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía, Ceuta y Melilla — Spain) — ZP v Delegación del Gobierno en Melilla
Date: 2020-11-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU national, Spain, administrative sanction, defence policy, foreign national, national law, ownership








C_2021138EN.01002803.xml










19.4.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/28






Order of the President of the Court of Justice of 27 November 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Andalucía, Ceuta y Melilla — Spain) — ZP v Delegación del Gobierno en Melilla
(Case C-38/20) (1)

(2021/C 138/35)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 137, 27.4.2020.