do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates (Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.) 13 November 2020 2020/C 389/02
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2020389EN.01000201.xml










16.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

13 November 2020
(2020/C 389/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1815 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,88 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4468 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89683 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2537 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,0805 




ISK


Iceland króna


161,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


10,8123 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,461 




HUF


Hungarian forint


355,71 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4888 




RON


Romanian leu


4,8698 




TRY


Turkish lira


9,1303 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6300 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5528 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1608 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7304 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5934 




KRW


South Korean won


1 311,84 




ZAR


South African rand


18,4068 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8071 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5720 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 741,86 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8707 




PHP


Philippine peso


56,954 




RUB


Russian rouble


91,6113 




THB


Thai baht


35,646 




BRL


Brazilian real


6,4508 




MXN


Mexican peso


24,2239 




INR


Indian rupee


88,1860 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-686/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2021035EN.01005301.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/53






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)
(Case T-686/20)
(2021/C 35/70)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Asian Gear BV (Pijnacker, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Gravendeel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Multimox Holding BV (Rijen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 607 155-0004

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 1043/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0004 is declared invalid;










—


in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures 2020/C 389/04
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, Russia, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, plate, steel








C_2020389EN.01000401.xml










16.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/4






Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2020/C 389/04)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit G-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than 3 months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Cold-rolled flat steel products


The People’s Republic of China
The Russian Federation


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 of 29 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cold rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation
(OJ L 210, 4.8.2016, p. 1)


5.8.2021






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case C-603/20: Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division made on 16 November 2020 — SS v MCP
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: child, illegal restraint, jurisdiction, residence, third country








C_2021028EN.01003001.xml










25.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 28/30






Reference for a preliminary ruling from High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division made on 16 November 2020 — SS v MCP
(Case C-603/20)
(2021/C 28/48)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Family Division

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SS

Defendant: MCP

Question referred

Does Article 10 of Brussels 2 (1) retain jurisdiction, without limit of time, in a member state if a child habitually resident in that member state was wrongfully removed to (or retained in) a non-member state where she, following such removal (or retention), in due course became habitually resident?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003, L 338, p. 1).
Case T-683/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, footwear industry








C_2021019EN.01006601.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/66






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
(Case T-683/20)
(2021/C 19/72)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 1 457 113-0405

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 in Case R 1648/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Case T-685/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, two-wheeled vehicle








C_2021035EN.01005201.xml










1.2.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/52






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Asian Gear v EUIPO — Multimox (Scooter)
(Case T-685/20)
(2021/C 35/69)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Asian Gear BV (Pijnacker, Netherlands) (represented by: B. Gravendeel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Multimox Holding BV (Rijen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 607 155-0002

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 September 2020 in Case R 1042/2018-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul or vary the contested decision, so that Community design No 607 155-0002 is declared invalid;










—


in the alternative, confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 April 2018 and annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs to the applicant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Case T-684/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, footwear industry








C_2021019EN.01006701.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/67






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
(Case T-684/20)
(2021/C 19/73)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 1 457 113-0075

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 in Case R 1649/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Case T-688/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Freshly Cosmetics v EUIPO — Misiego Blázquez (IDENTY BEAUTY)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2021019EN.01006901.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/69






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Freshly Cosmetics v EUIPO — Misiego Blázquez (IDENTY BEAUTY)
(Case T-688/20)
(2021/C 19/75)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Freshly Cosmetics, SL (Reus, Spain) (represented by: P. Roiger Bellostes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Francisco Misiego Blázquez (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark IDENTY BEAUTY — Application for registration No 17 913 910

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 September 2020 in Case R 205/2020-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision and grant the registration of European Union trade mark No 17 913 910 IDENTY BEAUTY in respect of all the goods and services in Class 3;










—


order the proprietor of the earlier mark to pay the costs.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-682/20: Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, footwear industry








C_2021019EN.01006502.xml










18.1.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 19/65






Action brought on 16 November 2020 — Legero Schuhfabrik v EUIPO — Rieker Schuh (Schuhwaren)
(Case T-682/20)
(2021/C 19/71)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Legero Schuhfabrik GmbH (Feldkirchen bei Graz, Austria) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rieker Schuh AG (Thayngen, Switzerland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Design at issue: Community design No 1 451 421-0185

Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 September 2020 in Case R 1650/2019-3

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the second sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;










—


Infringement of the first sentence of Article 62 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9882 — SAZKA Group/ÖBAG/Casinos Austria) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 395/01
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: automatic game, economic concentration, electronic game, game of chance, gaming establishment, holding company, investment company, merger control, parent company








C_2020395EN.01000101.xml










20.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 395/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9882 — SAZKA Group/ÖBAG/Casinos Austria)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 395/01)
On 16 November 2020, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32020M9882. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation 2020/C 389/03
Date: 2020-11-16
Institutions: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Commission
Subjects: Cyprus, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency








C_2020389EN.01000301.xml










16.11.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 389/3






New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
(2020/C 389/03)




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Cyprus

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

Issuing country: Cyprus

Subject of commemoration: The 30th anniversary of the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and genetics

Description of the design: The design depicts a ‘neuron with its synapses’ in reference to the activities performed by the Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, which celebrates 30 years of existence. The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics receives international recognition and plays an active and essential role as a national, regional and international centre of excellence for the provision opf high quality services, innovative reasearch and postgraduate education. The iossuing country’s name ‘KYΠΡΟΣ - KIBRIS’ and the phrase ‘ΙΝΣΤΙTOYΤΟ ΝΕΥΡΟΛΟΓΊΑΣ & ΓΕΝΕΤΙKHΣ KYΠΡΟY 1990-2020’ (i.e. Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics 1990-2020) are inscribed in circle around the design.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 412 000

Date of issue: Fourth quarter of 2020


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).